The URL can be used to link to this page

020325 Council Mtg Mins Adopted Page 1 of 7 MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 3, 2025 Briton S. Williams, Mayor Jenafer F. McCauley, Councilmember – Mayor Pro Tem David B. Buck, Councilmember Pat C. Carpenter, Councilmember David W. McGhee, Councilmember Kevin W. Toole, Councilmember ORDER OF BUSINESS The Public Power Hour was streamed for public viewing online at: “City of North Augusta – Public Information” on www.Facebook.com and “City of North Augusta Public Information” on www.YouTube.com. PUBLIC POWER HOUR The February 3, 2025 Public Power Hour began at 5:30pm. Members present were Mayor Williams, Councilmembers Buck, Carpenter, McCauley, McGhee (arrived at 5:39pm), and Toole. Also, in attendance were Ricky Jones, Manager of Information Technology and Jamie Paul, City Clerk. 1. April Jordan Director of Cumbee Center to Assist Abused Persons, Inc. spoke on teal ribbons to be placed downtown for Sexual Assault Awareness Month for March and highlighted on Teen Dating Violence Awareness Month - February. The Public Power Hour concluded at 5:45pm. Page 2 of 7 REGULAR MEETING The Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of North Augusta of February 3, 2025 having been duly publicized was called to order by Mayor Williams at 6:00pm and also streamed online for public viewing at “City of North Augusta – Public Information” on www.Facebook.com and on the “City of North Augusta Public Information” on www.YouTube.com. Per Section 30-4-80, (e) notice of the meeting by email was sent out to the current maintained “Agenda Mailout” list consisting of news media outlets and individuals or companies requesting notification. Notice of the meeting was also posted on the outside doors of the Municipal Center, the main bulletin board of the Municipal Center located on the first floor, and the City of North Augusta website. Members present were Mayor Williams, Councilmembers Buck, Carpenter, McCauley, McGhee, and Toole. Also in attendance were J.D. McCauley, Assistant Administrator; Thomas C. Zeaser, Director of Engineering and Public Works; Chief Junior Johnson, Director of Public Safety; Jason Sikes, Superintendent of Sanitation; Roy Kibler, Superintendent of Property Maintenance; Rick Meyer, Director of Parks and Recreation; Tommy Paradise, Director of Planning and Development; Ricky Jones, Manager of Information Technology; and Jamie Paul, City Clerk. ITEM 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of the City Council Meeting of January 6, 2025 and Study Session of January 27, 2025, were approved as submitted by general consent. ITEM 5. PERSONNEL: • Public Safety Lifesaver Award Mayor Williams read the Memo regarding the Public Safety Lifesaver Award (See Attachment 5) and recognized all of the Public Safety officers involved and the city employee. • Sgt. David Bunch, Public Safety, Retirement – Recognition of Service to the City of North Augusta Mayor Williams recognized Sgt. David Bunch and stated that with deep gratitude and appreciation, we recognize Station Sergeant David Bunch for his 27 years of dedicated service to the Citizens of North Augusta and the Men and Women of North Augusta Public Safety. David began his career with Public Safety on February 18, 1998, as a Station 2 Firefighter and steadily worked his way through the ranks, always striving for excellence and the betterment of the department. In February 2015, he was instrumental in launching operations at Station 3, demonstrating his leadership, expertise, and commitment to public service. A level-headed officer and a mentor to many, David was always willing to share his knowledge and guide others in their careers. His dedication extended beyond the field, as he pursued higher education while working—earning an Associate’s Degree from Aiken Technical College and a Bachelor’s Degree from Columbia Southern University. David’s unwavering commitment, professionalism, and mentorship have left a lasting impact on Public Safety. You serve as a model for others to follow, and your presence will be greatly missed. Thank you, David, for your outstanding service and dedication. Mayor Williams presented him with a plaque. Mayor Williams and Council congratulated Sgt. David Bunch on his retirement. Page 3 of 7 OLD BUSINESS ITEM 6. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT: Ordinance No. 2025-01 To Change the Corporate Limits of the City of North Augusta by Accepting the Petition Requesting Annexation by the Landowners and Annexing ± 0.70 Acres of Property Located at Edgefield Road/Saint James Street Tax Parcel Number 012- 05-14-004 Owned by Adams Brothers Properties, LLC – Second Reading Mayor Williams recused himself from Item 6. He requested that Mayor Pro Tem McCauley cover the item. No public comment. It was moved by Councilmember Carpenter, seconded by Councilmember Buck, to approve Ordinance No. 2025-01 To Change the Corporate Limits of the City of North Augusta by Accepting the Petition Requesting Annexation by the Landowners and Annexing ± 0.70 Acres of Property Located at Edgefield Road/Saint James Street Tax Parcel Number 012-05-14-004 Owned by Adams Brothers Properties, LLC – Second Reading. Vote: 5 – 0 Approved. Mayor Williams was recused. (See Attachment #6) NEW BUSINESS ITEM 7. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT: Ordinance No. 2025-02 To Change the Corporate Limits of the City of North Augusta by Accepting the Petition Requesting Annexation by the Landowners and Annexing ± 381.29 Acres of Property Located East of Edgefield Road and North of Belvedere Clearwater Road, Tax Parcel Numbers 011-14-04-045 and 011-19-01-001 Owned by Walton South Carolina, LLC– First Reading Mayor Williams asked for a motion for discussion on item 7. It was moved by Councilmember McCauley, seconded by Councilmember Toole, to Approve Ordinance No. 2025-02 To Change the Corporate Limits of the City of North Augusta by Accepting the Petition Requesting Annexation by the Landowners and Annexing ± 381.29 Acres of Property Located East of Edgefield Road and North of Belvedere Clearwater Road, Tax Parcel Numbers 011-14-04-045 and 011-19- 01-001 Owned by Walton South Carolina, LLC– First Reading. Unanimously Approved. (See Attachment #7) No discussion on item 7, Mayor Williams requested this item to be tabled. It was moved by Councilmember Buck, seconded by Councilmember Toole, to Table Ordinance No. 2025- 02 To Change the Corporate Limits of the City of North Augusta by Accepting the Petition Requesting Annexation by the Landowners and Annexing ± 381.29 Acres of Property Located East of Edgefield Road and North of Belvedere Clearwater Road, Tax Parcel Numbers 011-14-04-045 and 011-19-01-001 Owned by Walton South Carolina, LLC– First Reading. Unanimously Approved. ITEM 8. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT: Ordinance No. 2025-03 To Amend the Zoning Map of the City of North Augusta, South Carolina by Rezoning ± 86.12 Acres of Land Owned by the Kellogg Corporation, ET AL, Tax Parcel No. 012-08-01-001 from CR, Critical Areas to PD, Planned Development – First Reading Mayor Williams asked for a motion for discussion on item 8. It was moved by Councilmember McCauley, seconded by Councilmember Toole, to Approve Ordinance No. 2025-03 To Amend the Zoning Map of the City of North Augusta, South Carolina by Rezoning ± 86.12 Page 4 of 7 Acres of Land Owned by the Kellogg Corporation, ET AL, Tax Parcel No. 012-08-01-001 from CR, Critical Areas to PD, Planned Development – First Reading. Unanimously Approved. (See Attachment #8) No discussion on item 8, Mayor Williams requested this item to be tabled. It was moved by Councilmember McCauley, seconded by Councilmember Carpenter, to Table Ordinance No. 2025-03 To Amend the Zoning Map of the City of North Augusta, South Carolina by Rezoning ± 86.12 Acres of Land Owned by the Kellogg Corporation, ET AL, Tax Parcel No. 012-08-01-001 from CR, Critical Areas to PD, Planned Development – First Reading. Unanimously Approved. ITEM 9. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT: Ordinance No. 2025-04 To Approve the General Development Plan for the 467± Acre Kellogg Planned Development Generally Located East of US 25 and North of SC 126 – First Reading Mayor Williams asked for a motion for discussion on item 9. It was moved by Councilmember McCauley, seconded by Councilmember Toole, to Approve Ordinance No. 2025-04 To Approve the General Development Plan for the 467± Acre Kellogg Planned Development Generally Located East of US 25 and North of SC 126 – First Reading. Unanimously Approved. (See Attachment #9) No discussion on item 9, Mayor Williams requested this item to be tabled. It was moved by Councilmember Buck, seconded by Councilmember McCauley, to Table Ordinance No. 2025-04 To Approve the General Development Plan for the 467± Acre Kellogg Planned Development Generally Located East of US 25 and North of SC 126 – First Reading. Unanimously Approved. ITEM 10. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT: Ordinance No. 2025-05 Imposing a Moratorium on the Issuance of Certificates of Zoning Compliance, Building Permits, Design Review Approvals, Site Development Plan Approvals, Subdivision Approvals, or Other Similar Land Use or Construction Approvals for any Multi- Family Developments – First Reading Administrator Clifford highlighted on the moratorium ordinance and clarified the most up to date ordinance was provided to Council this evening. Public Comment: Jason Whinghter, Aiken County resident, requested for the updated version of the ordinance. Mayor Williams clarified that the ordinance is only for apartments (multi-family). He asked for the council to look at the actual standalone apartment complexes have been built in the city over the last 10-years and stated that there has not been many. He added that he felt the city was not getting that over run as the city may think. He asked to consider that not all projects would be built this year or next year and that there is a long lead time on it. He noted that for the standalone apartment projects, most developers are looking for the 250-300 unit deal which takes 15-25 acres to accomplish which leads to how many parcels that actually work. Mayor Williams stated that his comments are exactly why the council is looking at the moratorium as the code is fragmented where we incentivize everywhere and once they come back at the end of the moratorium all areas such as the council, planning commission, plan director, etc. will be on the same page. Page 5 of 7 It was moved by Councilmember McCauley, seconded by Councilmember Buck, to approve Ordinance No. 2025-05 Imposing a Moratorium on the Issuance of Certificates of Zoning Compliance, Building Permits, Design Review Approvals, Site Development Plan Approvals, Subdivision Approvals, or Other Similar Land Use or Construction Approvals for any Multi-Family Developments – First Reading. Unanimously Approved. Attorney Zier requested for a change to the Ordinance after “NOW, THEREFORE,…” Roman numeral I. to add the words “for Multi-Family Developments” and to read as follows: I. City Council hereby imposes a moratorium on the issuance of certificates of compliance, building permits, design review approvals, site development plan approvals, or other similar land use or construction approvals under the Development Code or other City ordinances for Multi-Family Developments until August 7, 2027. However, Council reserves the right to reduce or extend such moratorium by a proper action of Council. Discussion ensued relating to what Multi-Family Development projects can be built during the moratorium. It was moved by Councilmember McCauley, seconded by Councilmember Toole, to approve the amendment as noted above of Ordinance No. 2025-05 Imposing a Moratorium on the Issuance of Certificates of Zoning Compliance, Building Permits, Design Review Approvals, Site Development Plan Approvals, Subdivision Approvals, or Other Similar Land Use or Construction Approvals for any Multi- Family Developments – First Reading. Unanimously Approved. (See Attachment #10 Amendment) ITEM 11. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT: Resolution No. 2025-02 Accepting a Deed of Dedication for the Water and Sanitary Sewer, Along with a Maintenance Guarantee and Cash Deposit, for Parker’s Kitchen No public comment. Administrator Clifford routine action, he noted that there are two Parkers Kitchen; this is the one open on Jefferson Davis Hwy. It was moved by Councilmember Carpenter, seconded by Councilmember McGhee, to approve Resolution No. 2025-02 Accepting a Deed of Dedication for the Water and Sanitary Sewer, Along with a Maintenance Guarantee and Cash Deposit, for Parker’s Kitchen. Unanimously Approved. (See Attachment #11) ITEM 12. ENGINEERING: Resolution No. 2025-03 Authorizing the City of North Augusta to Enter into Professional Engineering Services Contracts with Multiple Firms to Perform Design Services for Various Storm Drainage Capital Improvement Projects No public comment. Administrator Clifford reviewed the RFQ and stated that the firms are for on-call engineering services for stormwater. It was moved by Councilmember Buck, seconded by Councilmember McCauley, to approve Resolution No. 2025-03 Authorizing the City of North Augusta to Enter into Professional Engineering Services Contracts with Multiple Firms to Perform Design Services for Various Storm Drainage Capital Improvement Projects. Unanimously Approved. (See Attachment #12) Page 6 of 7 ITEM 13. FINANCE: Resolution No. 2025-04 Approving the Annual Assessment Report and Amendment of the Assessment Roll for the Ballpark Village Municipal Improvement District and Confirming the Collection of Annual Assessments Therein for the 2024-2025 Assessment Year No public comment. Administrator Clifford stated that this is an annual report and reviewed at the prior study session. It was moved by Councilmember Toole, seconded by Councilmember McCauley, to approve Resolution No. 2025-04 Approving the Annual Assessment Report and Amendment of the Assessment Roll for the Ballpark Village Municipal Improvement District and Confirming the Collection of Annual Assessments Therein for the 2024-2025 Assessment Year. Unanimously Approved. (See Attachment #13) ITEM 14. ADMINISTRATION: Resolution No. 2025-05 Authorizing Extensions of Awarded Allocation of the Accommodations Tax Advisory Committee for the Disbursement of Revenues from the Accommodations Tax Year 2022-2023 No public comment. Administrator Clifford noted each of the applications requesting for an extension and was approved for recommendation by the Accommodations Tax Advisory Committee. It was moved by Councilmember McCauley, seconded by Councilmember McGhee, to approve Resolution No. 2025-05 Authorizing Extensions of Awarded Allocation of the Accommodations Tax Advisory Committee for the Disbursement of Revenues from the Accommodations Tax Year 2022-2023. Unanimously Approved. (See Attachment #14) ITEM 15. PARKS & RECREATION: Resolution No. 2025-06 Relating to the Department of Parks & Recreation Department; Authorizing a Grant Application to the State of South Carolina Parks, Recreation & Tourism Department for Federal Funding Assistance to Support a Project Submitted Under the Recreation Trails Program (RTP) Under the Approval of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) No public comment. Assistant Administrator McCauley highlighted that the request is for the Palmetto Parkway Trail and noted the funding request. It was moved by Councilmember McCauley, seconded by Councilmember Carpenter, to approve Resolution No. 2025-06 Relating to the Department of Parks & Recreation Department; Authorizing a Grant Application to the State of South Carolina Parks, Recreation & Tourism Department for Federal Funding Assistance to Support a Project Submitted Under the Recreation Trails Program (RTP) Under the Approval of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Unanimously Approved. (See Attachment #15) ITEM 16. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS a. Update on Hurricane Helene Recovery Efforts Administrator Clifford presented an update on the Hurricane Helene Recovery Efforts. (See Attachment #16) NADPS-150 Rev. 4/4/94 NORTH AUGUSTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY North Augusta, South Carolina Intra-Office Memo Date: 01/03/2025 To: Chief Johnson From: Sgt. Rauton Subject: Life Saving Award On 01/03/2025 Cpl. Patten, PSO Ouzts and FF Dandy were at Station 3, when a citizen came knocking on the door stating that one of the city employees was outside laying on the ground. Cpl Patten then advised dispatch to contact EMS and went outside to the patient. PSO Ouzts and FF Dandy grabbed medical bags and went to the patient. Cpl Waldrop then arrived at Station 3 and started a rapid assessment on the patient and found the patient to be unresponsive and not breathing. Cpl Patten then began doing CPR on the patient while PSO Ouzts and FF Dandy started to prep the BVM and O2. Cpl Waldrop then grabbed the AED and attached it to the patient. After approximately 30 compressions the AED provided an audible direction of “Shock Advised”. A shock was then delivered and CPR was resumed. Cpl Waldrop then noticed the victim to start showing signs of life. CPR was then stopped and assisted rescue breathing was continued, until the patient showed signs of full responsiveness. The patient then became verbally alert and was breathing normally on his own with 99% O2 reading. EMS arrived shortly after to transport the patient to Augusta MCG. Later on, a Doctor from MCG called stating that the patient was in the ICU awake and talking and the patient wanted to thank Cpl Patten, Cpl Waldrop, PSO Ouzts, and FF Dandy for saving his life. ATTACHMENT #5 Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-01 TO CHANGE THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA BY ACCEPTING THE PETITION REQUESTING ANNEXATION BY THE LANDOWNERS AND ANNEXING ± 0.70 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT EDGEFIELD ROAD/SAINT JAMES STREET TAX PARCEL NUMBER 012-05-14-004 OWNED BY ADAMS BROTHERS PROPERTIES, LLC WHEREAS, Section 5-3-150(3) of the Code of Laws of the State of South Carolina provides that: "Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (1) and (2) of this section, any area or property which is contiguous to a municipality may be annexed to the municipality by filing with the municipal governing body a petition signed by all persons owning real estate in the area requesting annexation. Upon the agreement of the governing body to accept the petition and annex the area, and the enactment of an ordinance declaring the area annexed to the municipality, the annexation is complete"; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council of the City of North Augusta, have reviewed the petition of the landowners requesting that their property be annexed into the City and determined that such Petition should be accepted and the property annexed into the City; and WHEREAS, the property is situated within the area of the North Augusta 2021 Comprehensive Plan and recommended for Residential Single Family by that plan as specified in the Land Use Element; and WHEREAS, the annexation request and zoning classification has been reviewed by the Planning Commission which has recommended annexation of the property with + 0.70 acres to be zoned R-7, Small Lot Single Family Residential. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of North Augusta, South Carolina, in meeting duly assembled and by the authority thereof that: I. The Petition of the landowners is accepted and the following described property shall be annexed into the City of North Augusta: ALL that certain piece, parcel or tract of land, with all improvements thereon, situate, lying and being in the County of Aiken, State of South Carolina, consisting of Seventy Hundredths (0.70) of an acre, more or less, appearing on that plat prepared for Anthony P. and Carol D. Riley by William H. McKie, III P.L.S. dated October 29, 2021 and recorded in the RMC Office of Aiken County in Plat Book 63 at Page 566. Said plat is incorporated herein by reference thereto. ATTACHMENT #6 Page 1 of 3 This parcel is identified as being on St. James Street by Tax Parcel Number 012- 05-14-004. The ±0.70 acres is requested to be zoned R-7 Small Lot Single-Family Residential. The property to be annexed is also shown on a map identified as “Exhibit A” titled “Map of Property Sought to be Annexed to the City of North Augusta” and prepared by the City of North Augusta. II. The zoning classification shall be +0.70 acres as R-7, Small Lot Single-Family Residential. III. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed. IV. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption on second and final reading. DONE, RATIFIED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, ON THIS ______ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025. First Reading Briton Williams, Mayor Second Reading ATTEST: Jamie Paul, City Clerk ATTACHMENT #6 Page 2 of 3 05010015020025 Feet 12/4/2024 Path: H:\kbaker\ArcGIS\Annexations\ANX24-007 St James St Townhouses\ANX24-007 St James St Townhouses.aprx PROJECT NUMBER ANX24-007 MAP OF PROPERTY SOUGHT TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA ± EDG E F I E L D C A R M E L BELV EDERE CLEA R W A T E R BELV E D E R E C L E ARWATER EVEL Y N ST JAM E S LA R R Y D E E PINEV I EW KERREDG E F I E L D JEF F HASKELL WI L D E S A N D M ELIZ A B E T H DO RR ROS E M A R Y FRA N C E S JESSE D E E EXHIBIT A Outside CityInside City TPN 012-05-14-004 Approximately 0.70 acres ATTACHMENT #6 Page 3 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-02 TO CHANGE THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA BY ACCEPTING THE PETITION REQUESTING ANNEXATION BY THE LANDOWNERS AND ANNEXING ± 381.29 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF EDGEFIELD ROAD AND NORTH OF BELVEDERE CLEARWATER ROAD, TAX PARCEL NUMBERS 011-14-04-045 AND 011-19-01-001 OWNED BY WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA, LLC WHEREAS, Section 5-3-150(3) of the Code of Laws of the State of South Carolina provides that: "Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (1) and (2) of this section, any area or property which is contiguous to a municipality may be annexed to the municipality by filing with the municipal governing body a petition signed by all persons owning real estate in the area requesting annexation. Upon the agreement of the governing body to accept the petition and annex the area, and the enactment of an ordinance declaring the area annexed to the municipality, the annexation is complete"; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council of the City of North Augusta, have reviewed the petition of the landowners requesting that their property be annexed into the City and determined that such Petition should be accepted and the property annexed into the City; and WHEREAS, the property is situated within the area of the North Augusta 2021 Comprehensive Plan and recommended for Mixed Use by that plan as specified in the Land Use Element; and WHEREAS, the annexation request and zoning classification has been reviewed by the Planning Commission which has recommended annexation of the property with + 381.29 acres to be zoned PD, Planned Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of North Augusta, South Carolina, in meeting duly assembled and by the authority thereof that: I. The Petition of the landowners is accepted and the following described property shall be annexed into the City of North Augusta: PARCEL 1: A portion of Tract E identified as TMS #011-14-04-045 approximately 1.08 acres in Aiken County on an ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey of Tracts A, B, C, D & E of “The Kellogg Tract” prepared for Walton Global Holdings, LLC and prepared by Thomas & Hutton dated August 8, 2022. Commencing at the intersection of the centerline of Holley Hill Drive and the eastern margin of Edgefield Road (US Highway No. 25), thence south-southwesterly along the ATTACHMENT #7 Page 1 of 8 eastern margin of Edgefield Road a distance of 660' feet, more or less, to a 2" open top pipe found at the common corner of Cornelia Kennedy and Anthony Riley; thence continuing along the eastern margin of Edgefield Road S 16°40'58" W a distance of 50.17 feet to a 4/8" rebar found at the common corner of Cornelia Kennedy and PARCEL 1; said point being the Point Of Beginning; Thence along the eastern margin of Edgefield Road the following one (1) call: (1) S 16°14'24" W a distance of 60.79 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; Thence with PARCEL 2, other lands of The Kellogg Corporation the following two (2) calls: (1) S 75°06'55" Ea distance of 503.96 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; (2) thence N 19°00'46" Ea distance of 111.57 feet to a 1/2" open top pipe found; Thence with the lands of Anthony Riley the following one (1) call: (1) N 75°09'22" W a distance of 328.97 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; Thence with the lands of Cornelia Kennedy the following two (2) calls: (1) S 16°42'21" W a distance of 50.00 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; (2) thence N 75°12'45" W a distance of 180.00 feet to a point; Said point being the Point Of Beginning. Said parcel containing 1.08 acres more or less. PARCEL 2: A portion of Tract C identified as TMS #011-19-01-001 approximately 374.77 acres in Aiken County on an ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey of Tracts A, B, C, D & E of “The Kellogg Tract” prepared for Walton Global Holdings, LLC and prepared by Thomas & Hutton dated August 8, 2022. Commencing at the intersection of the centerline of Holley Hill Drive and the eastern margin of Edgefield Road (US Highway No. 25), thence south-southwesterly along the eastern margin of Edgefield Road a distance of 660' feet, more or less, to a 2" open top pipe found at the common corner of Cornelia Kennedy and Anthony Riley; thence continuing along the eastern margin of Edgefield Road S 16°40'58" W a distance of 50.17 feet to a 4/8" rebar found at the common corner of Cornelia Kennedy and Parcel 1, other lands of The Kellogg Corporation; thence continuing along the eastern margin of Edgefield Road S 16°14'24" W a distance of 60.79 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set at the common corner of PARCEL 2, other lands of the Kellogg Corporation, and PARCEL 1; said point being the Point Of Beginning; Thence with PARCEL 1, other lands of The Kellogg Corporation the following two (2) calls: (1) S 75°06155" Ea distance of 503.96 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; ATTACHMENT #7 Page 2 of 8 (2) thence N 19°00146" Ea distance of 111.57 feet to a 1/2" open top pipe found; Thence with the lands of Anthony Riley the following one (1) call: (1) S 74°56122" Ea distance of 482.59 feet to a 1-1/2" open top pipe found; Thence with the various lands of Anthony Riley, Betty Ann Sherlock, and Brenda Sue & Ronald W. Fulmer the following one (1) call: (1) N 17°35102" Ea distance of 866.59 feet to a 1/2" open top pipe found; Thence with the lands of Brighter Side Properties, LLC the following two (2) calls: (1) N 17°44156" Ea distance of 569.09 feet to a 5/8" rebar found; (2) thence N 15°48151" Ea distance of 47.65 feet to a 5/8" rebar found; Thence with the various lands of Bodie, Parker, Etheridge, & Aspinall the following one (1) call: (1) N 18°23154" Ea distance of 395.35 feet to a point; Thence with the lands of Hunter 34, LLC the following eight (8) calls: (1) S 69°45146" Ea distance of 302.09 feet to a 1/2" rod found; (2) thence S 73°3411311 Ea distance of 614.09 feet to a 3/4" open top pipe found; (3) thence N 74°43129" Ea distance of 804.19 feet to al" crimp top pipe found; ( 4) thence S 80° l 8140" E a distance of 280.17 feet to a 1" crimp top pipe found; (5) thence S 69°44'36" Ea distance of 394.88 feet to a 3/4" open top pipe found; (6) thence S 49°47136" Ea distance of 324.03 feet to a 1" crimp top pipe found; (7) thence S 44°28148" Ea distance of 104.74 feet to a 5/8" rebar found; (8) thence S 29°41 129" Ea distance of 29.86 feet to a right-of-way monument found; Thence with the western margin of Interstate 520 (Palmetto Parkway) the following twenty (20) calls: (1) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the left, having an arc length of 353.98 feet, a radius of 10,697.41 feet, a chord length of 353.97 feet, and a chord bearing S 21 °49148" E to a right-of-way monument found; (2) thence S 22°3611511 Ea distance of 159.43 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (3) thence S 34°03157" Ea distance of 195.47 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (4) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 1,073.64 feet, a radius of9,822.38 feet, a chord length of 1,073.10 feet, and a chord bearing S 18°26134" E to a right-of-way monument found; (5) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 634.55 feet, a radius of 9,822.38 feet, a chord length of 634.44 feet, and a chord bearing S 13°27139" E to a right-of-way monument found; (6) thence S 78°30150" W a distance of 30.22 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (7) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 535.13 feet, a radius of 9,730.00 feet, a chord length of 535.06 feet, and a chord bearing S 09°57'36" E to a right-of-way monument found; (8) thence S 00°21 139" W a distance of98.76 feet to a right-of-way monument found; ATTACHMENT #7 Page 3 of 8 (9) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 96.97 feet, a radius of 9,715.00 feet, a chord length of 96.97 feet, and a chord bearing S 07°3213911 E to a right-of-way monument found; (10) thence S 26°55'00" Ea distance of 103.64 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (11) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 194.52 feet, a radius of 9,750.00 feet, a chord length of 194.52 feet, and a chord bearing S 05°5812911 E to a right-of-way monument found; (12) thence S 09°1315611 W a distance of 201.22 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (13) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 291.06 feet, a radius of 7,339.44 feet, a chord length of 291.04 feet, and a chord bearing S 03°3713711 E to a right-of-way monument found; (14) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 96.85 feet, a radius of7,339.44 feet, a chord length of 96.85 feet, and a chord bearing S 02°0614711 E to a right-of-way monument found; (15) thence S 18°2312611 Ea distance of 306.23 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (16) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 244.50 feet, a radius of 7,429.44 feet, a chord length of 244.49 feet, and a chord bearing S 00°2013011 W to a right-of-way monument found; (17) thence S l 7°3515911 W a distance of 264.75 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (18) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 347.98 feet, a radius of 1,696.59 feet, a chord length of347.37 feet, and a chord bearing S 09°1711411 W to a right-of-way monument found; (19) thence S 00°0015411 E a distance of 321.28 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (20) thence S 24°1912911 W a distance of 42.93 feet to a right-of-way monument found; Thence along the northern margin of Vigilance Way the following two (2) calls: (1) N 34 °2915611 W a distance of 425 .83 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; (2)thence with the arc of a curve turning to the left, having an arc length of 823.07 feet, a radius of 610.46 feet, a chord length of 762.13 feet, and a chord bearing N 73°07'2711 W to a right-of-way disk found; Thence along the northern margin of Belvedere Clearwater Road (SC-126) the following twelve (12) calls: (1) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the left, having an arc length of 36.85 feet, a radius of 1,004.93 feet, a chord length of 36.85 feet, and a chord bearing N 68°0414711 W to a right-of-way disk found; (2) thence N 21 °3011011 Ea distance of 163.42 feet to a right-of-way disk found; (3) thence N 34°3713311 W a distance of 62.69 feet to a right-of-way disk found; (4) thence S 56°5611311 W a distance of 104.06 feet to a right-of-way disk found; (5) thence S 86°31 14711 W a distance of 353.48 feet to a right-of-way disk found; ( 6) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the left, having an arc length of 402.04 feet, a radius of 1,064.93 feet, a chord length of399.66 feet, and a chord bearing S 76°11 10611 W to a right-of-way disk found; (7) thence S 65°2613711 W a distance of 269.91 feet to a right-of-way disk found; ATTACHMENT #7 Page 4 of 8 (8) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 163 .94 feet, a radius of 3,164.04 feet, a chord length of 163.92 feet, and a chord bearing S 66°5413511 W to a right-of-way disk found; (9) thence S 71 °46'5211 W a distance of 97.04 feet to a right-of-way disk found; (10) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 289 .30 feet, a radius of 3,159.04 feet, a chord length of 289.20 feet, and a chord bearing S 72°54'0911 W to a right-of-way disk found; (11) thence S 52°43'5911 W a distance of 160.00 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; (12) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 321.97 feet, a radius of 3,224.04 feet, a chord length of 321.84 feet, and a chord bearing S 80°52'11 11 W to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; Thence along the lands of Carol Ann S. Long and the lands of various owners within the Heritage Subdivision the following three (3) calls: (1) N 11 °57'23 11 Ea distance of 1,207.66 feet to a 1/211 open top pipe found; (2) thence N 12°22'1211 Ea distance of 680.21 feet to a 3/411 open top pipe found; (3) thence S 82°41'5211 W a distance of 1,357.78 feet to a 3/411 crimp top pipe found in the eastern margin of Wildwood Drive; Thence along the eastern margin of Wildwood Drive and along the lands of Howard Weddle the following one (1) call: (1) N 06°09'0211 Ea distance of 273.17 feet to a 3/411 open top pipe found; Thence along the various lands of Howard Weddle, Sara & Stephen Mundy, and Brandi & Kristian English the following one (1) call: (1) N 56°21'58 11 W a distance of218.75 feet to a l/211 open top pipe found; Thence along the various lands of Brandi & Kristian English the following one (1) call: (1) S 78°31 '22" W a distance of 219.42 feet to a 3/411 open top pipe found; Thence along lands of an unknown owner the following two (2) calls: (1) N 59°41'4711 W a distance of 68.36 feet to a 3/411 crimp top pipe found; (2) thence N 45°36' 1311 W a distance of 56.20 feet to a 1" crimp top pipe found; Thence along various lands of TRC Acres 517, LLC the following six (6) calls: (1) N 17°28'3611 Ea distance of259.78 feet to a 3/411 crimp top pipe found; (2) thence S 87°05'1711 W a distance of 209.96 feet to a 2" open top pipe found; (3) thence N 16°41'5311 Ea distance of 30.62 feet to a 1" open top pipe found; (4) thence N 17°02'2711 Ea distance of256.94 feet to a l/211 open top pipe found; (5) thence N 17°06'4911 Ea distance of 14.93 feet to a 4/8" rebar found; (6) thence N 17°02'3511 Ea distance of 169.90 feet to a 1" open top pipe found; Thence along the lands of the County of Aiken Courthouse Complex the following three (3) calls: (1) N 16°58'1411 Ea distance of92.12 feet to a 2" open top pipe found; (2) thence N 16°59'0211 Ea distance of 106.89 feet to a 3/411 crimp top pipe found; ATTACHMENT #7 Page 5 of 8 (3) thence N 72°11 '38 11 W a distance of 321.29 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; Thence along the lands of Belvedere Jaycees, Inc. the following one (1) call: (1) N l 7°0014511 Ea distance of 173.21 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; Thence along the lands of the County of Aiken, known as Thomas Park the following three (3) calls: (1) S 70°1515411 Ea distance of 78.47 feet to a 4/8" rebar found; (2) thence N l 7°2310611 Ea distance of 389.39 feet to a 4/8" rebar found; (3) thence N 70°1515411 W a distance of 243.81 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; Thence along the various lands of William Johnson, Jr. and Mary S. & William Johnson, Jr. the following two (2) calls: (1) N 16°3710211 Ea distance of 221.22 feet to an axle found; (2) thence N 75°4311911 W a distance of 501.55 feet to a 1" open top pipe found in the eastern margin of Edgefield Road (U.S. Highway No. 25); Thence proceeding along said eastern margin of Edgefield Road the following two (2) calls: (1) N 18°22'4911 E a distance of 66.89 feet to a 2" open top pipe found; (2) thence N 16°14'2411 Ea distance of 42.94 feet to a point; Said point being the Point of Beginning. Said portion of PARCEL 2 containing 432.97 acres more or less. TOGETHER WITH Commencing at a 5/8" rebar & cap set in the eastern margin of lnterstate 520 at the common corner between PARC EL 2 and the lands of NAHH, LLC; said corner being the same as shown designated as "IPS 5/8"RB" marking the north corner of the adjacent lands shown as "THE KELLOGG CORP., N/F 16-00-0l-040(PT.) D.B. 524,167-169" on a plat prepared by Site Design, Inc., dated June 6, 2005, last revised October 22, 2009, recorded in Plat Book 54, pages 975 through 983; said point being the Point Of Beginning; Thence with the lands of NAHH, LLC the following three (3) calls: (1) S 39°3111011 E a distance of 896.27 feet to a 1" crimp top pipe found; (2) thence S 11 °2013211 Ea distance of 874.45 feet to a 1/211 open top pipe found; (3) thence S 35°17'1911 W a distance of 1,098.39 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set in the eastern margin of Interstate 520 (Palmetto Parkway); Thence with the eastern margin of Interstate 520 (Palmetto Parkway) the following eight (8) calls: (1) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 65.00 feet, a radius of 754.08 feet, a chord length of 64.98 feet, and a chord bearing N 30°0210811 W to a right-of-way monument found; ATTACHMENT #7 Page 6 of 8 (2) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 323 .09 feet, a radius of 2,201.12 feet, a chord length of 322.80 feet, and a chord bearing N 24°5311711 W to a right-of-way monument found; (3) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 480.02 feet, a radius of2,201.12 feet, a chord length of 479.07 feet, and a chord bearing N 14°26107" W to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; (4) thence N 00°31135" E a distance of 189.89 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (5) thence N 01 °25136" W a distance of 395.02 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (6) thence N 00°0 l 120" E a distance of 496.80 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (7) thence N 20°07110" Ea distance of 550.71 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (8) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the left, having an arc length of 33.66 feet, a radius of 8,029.44 feet, a chord length of 33.66 feet, and a chord bearing N 02°33134" W to a point; Said point being the Point of Beginning. Said portion of PARCEL 2 containing 33.12 acres more or less. Total Parcel 2 acreage is approximately 466.09 acres The +381.29 acres is requested to be zoned PD, Planned Development. The property to be annexed is also shown on a map identified as “Exhibit A” titled “Map of Property Sought to be Annexed to the City of North Augusta” and prepared by the City of North Augusta. II. The zoning classification shall be +381.29 acres as PD, Planned Development III. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed. IV. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption on second and final reading. DONE, RATIFIED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, ON THIS ______ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025. First Reading Briton S. Williams, Mayor Second Reading ATTEST: Jamie Paul, City Clerk ATTACHMENT #7 Page 7 of 8 05010015020025 Feet 4/18/2024 Path: H:\kbaker\ArcGIS\Annexations\ANX24-002 Kellogg Tract\ANX24-002 Kellogg Tract.aprx ANX24-002 MAP OF PROPERTY SOUGHT TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA ± ED G E F I E L D C A R M E L US25 CONNECTOR FA I R V I E W CL EARMONT JOHNSON COMMERC I A L LANTANA GREENLA N D CIRCLE VIEW STERLING PINECRE S T WHATL E Y HOLLEYHILL DUNDEE TERESA SANDER S SYCAMORE ELDER CELESTE DORR RITA E D N A P A L M E T T O WIL D W O O D MONTE R EY VE R D E R Y BE LAI R SP R I N G L E H IGH VIGILA N C E PI N E V I E W R IDGEFI E L D KERR BELVEDERE C L E A RWATE R JEF F SIN C L A I R ST JAM E S WI L D E GERBE R DAISY HERITAGE S AN D M GLE N M O R E SH A S TA D A I S YHAMP T O N NO R T H VIE W WARE JA C OB AUDUBON C O L O NIAL ELIZABETH RHOMB O I D LOP E R SA N J O S E LANDON NE W C AST L E NAPPIER ALEXA N D E R ADAMS AS H L E Y ED IST O HA ZEL HOR S ESHOE AYR OA K D A L E VIC T O R I A RIVER S PA L M E T T O P K W Y JANUARY EXHIBIT A Outside City Inside City TPNs 011-14-04-045 and 011-19-01-001 Approximately 381.29 acres ATTACHMENT #7 Page 8 of 8 Department of Planning and Development Project Staff Report ANX24-002 Kellogg Tract Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 1 of 3 SECTION 1: ANNEXATION REQUEST SUMMARY Address/Location Roughly bound by Edgefield Rd, I-520, and Belvedere Clearwater Road Parcel Numbers 011-19-01-001 and 011-14-04-045 Total Development Size ± 381.29 Zoning Requested PD, Planned Development Future Land Use Mixed Use SECTION 2: PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION Walton South Carolina, LLC the designated agent for the Kellogg Corporation, has requested to annex parcel numbers 011-19-01-001 and 011-14-04-045, approximately 381.29 acres, roughly bound by Edgefield Road, I-520, and Belvedere Clearwater Road. The request is for the parcels to be zoned PD, Planned Development at the time of annexation. NADC Additional Reviews 4.7 Annexation – All territory which may hereafter be granted or annexed to the City of North Augusta shall be classified automatically in the R-14 District, except that at the time the application for annexation is filed the applicant my request a zoning classification that is similar to surrounding zoning and in accord with the city’s Comprehensive Plan. Proposed annexations where the requested zoning is inconsistent with the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan or differs from zoning on adjacent properties shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission in accordance with Article 18, Administration and Enforcement. The Planning Commission shall recommend to the City Council the appropriate zoning for the property to be annexed, modification to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, or both. The Planning Commission is being asked to make a recommendation regarding the zoning classification of this property prior to annexation. The subject parcel Future Land Use is Mixed Use. ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 1 of 17 Project Staff Report ANX24-002 Kellogg Tract Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 2 of 3 SECTION 3: EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Subject Parcel Vacant Mixed Use RD/UD (Aiken County) North Vacant Mixed Use PD, Planned Development South Single-Family Residential Residential Single Family GC, General Commercial and R- 10, Medium Lot Single-Family Residential East I-520 Mixed Use N/A West Residential and Commercial Residential Single Family Aiken County SECTION 4: STAFF EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS The parcel proposed for annexation currently is heavily wooded with road access from Edgefield Road, Belvedere Clearwater Road, and Vigilance Way. There are several small office and storage buildings located at 607-613 Edgefield Road proposed to be demolished for use as an entrance to the proposed development. The applicant has requested the PD, Planned Development zoning district at the time of annexation. The Planning Commission is being asked to make a recommendation regarding the compatibility of the zoning classification of this property prior to annexation. The applicant has submitted a concurrent rezoning request for a portion of the property and a Planned Development General Development Plan. The Planned Development zoning district is described as the following: NADC Section 4.12.13 Planned Development District The purpose of the PD District is to encourage flexibility in the development of land to promote its appropriate use; to improve the design, character and quality of new development; to facilitate the provision of streets and utilities; and to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space. This district is intended for use in the undeveloped areas of the city where planned development offers a superior response to less coordinated single-lot development as permitted elsewhere in this Chapter. A PD district is specifically intended for development projects including housing of different types and densities and of compatible commercial uses, ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 17 Project Staff Report ANX24-002 Kellogg Tract Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 3 of 3 shopping centers, office parks, and mixed-use developments characterized by a unified site design for a mixed use development. Section 6.2 of the Comprehensive Plan promotes providing a more varied housing stock to attract and retain a more diverse population, especially in downtown and near employment centers. Section 6.2.2 of the Comprehensive Plan encourages revising the zoning ordinance and map to incentivize a variety of housing types at higher densities. This is further supported by Section 4.2.4 to support the priorities and principles of the Aiken, Edgefield, and Saluda Counties Economic Development Partnership by providing housing in an area that is expanding with new industries. Based on these descriptions and similarly zoned properties within the city limits, staff believes allowing PD, Planned Development zoning is appropriate for the property. SECTION 5: ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A Map Exhibit B Map Application Documents cc Cranston Engineering Group, via email DR Horton, Inc., via email ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 3 of 17 05010015020025 Feet 4/18/2024 Path: H:\kbaker\ArcGIS\Annexations\ANX24-002 Kellogg Tract\ANX24-002 Kellogg Tract.aprx ANX24-002 MAP OF PROPERTY SOUGHT TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA ± ED G E F I E L D C A R M E L US25 CONNECTOR FA I R V I E W CL EARMONT JOHNSON COMMERC I A L LANTANA GREENLA N D CIRCLE VIEW STERLING PINECRE S T WHATL E Y HOLLEYHILL DUNDEE TERESA SANDER S SYCAMORE ELDER CELESTE DORR RITA E D N A P A L M E T T O WIL D W O O D MONTE R EY VE R D E R Y BE LAI R SP R I N G L E H IGH VIGILA N C E PI N E V I E W R IDGEFI E L D KERR BELVEDERE C L E A RWATE R JEF F SIN C L A I R ST JAM E S WI L D E GERBE R DAISY HERITAGE S AN D M GLE N M O R E SH A S TA D A I S YHAMP T O N NO R T H VIE W WARE JA C OB AUDUBON C O L O NIAL ELIZABETH RHOMB O I D LOP E R SA N J O S E LANDON NE W C AST L E NAPPIER ALEXA N D E R ADAMS AS H L E Y ED IST O HA ZEL HOR S ESHOE AYR OA K D A L E VIC T O R I A RIVER S PA L M E T T O P K W Y JANUARY EXHIBIT A Outside City Inside City TPNs 011-14-04-045 and 011-19-01-001 Approximately 381.29 acres ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 4 of 17 ED G E F I E L D ED I S T O US 25 CON NEC TOR C A R M E L JOHNSON FA I R V I E W CLEARMO N T COMMERCI A L LANTANA GREENLA N D CIRCLE VIEW STERLING PINECRE S T WHATLE Y HOLLEYHILL DUNDEE TERESA SANDERS SYCAMORE ELDER CELESTE DORR RITA E D N A P A L M E T T O WIL D W O O D MONT E R EY VE R D E R Y BE LAIR SP R I N G L E HIG H VIGILA N C E PI N E V I E W R I D GEFI EL D KERR BELVEDER ECL E A RWAT E R ST JAM E S JEF F SIN C L A I R WI L D E GERBER DAISY HERITAGE S A N D M GL E N M O R E SH A ST A D AI S YHAMPT O N NO R T H VIE W WARE JA C OB AUDUBO N ELIZABE T H C OL O NIAL RHOMB O I D LOP E R LANDON CHARI O T NE W C AST L E AS H L E Y NAPPIER ALEXA N D E R ADAMS HA ZEL HORS E SHOE AYR OA K D A L E VIC T O R I A RIVER S PA L M E T T O P K W Y JANUARY ANX24-002 ZONING OF PROPERTY SOUGHT TO BY ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA 05251,0501,5752,100262.5 Feet 4/18/2024 ± Path: H:\kbaker\ArcGIS\Annexations\ANX24-002 Kellogg Tract\ANX24-002 Kellogg Tract.aprx EXHIBIT B Outside City Limits TPNs 011-14-04-045 and 011-19-01-001 PD, Planned Development ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 5 of 17 04/15/2024 Jared Poe ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 6 of 17 Designation of Agent Please type or print all information Sotith Carolincls Riuedront This form is required if the property owner is not the applicant. Application Number Staff Use Only Date Received 1. Project Name Kellogg Trac' Project Address/Location 607 Edgef!eld ROad Project Parcel Number(s) 011-19-01-001 and 012-08-01-001 2. Property @Wner Name Walton South Carolina, LLC OwnerPhone 813-951-0003 Mailing Address ssoo N Gainey Center Dr., Suite 345 City Scottsdale ST 42 2jp 85258 Email MikeDoherty@walton.com 3. Designated Agent Jared POe Relationship to Owner BuYer/Pur(tlaser Firm Name D.R. Horton, Inc.Phone 470-991-0177 Agent's Mailing Address 4234 Wheeler Road City Martinez 53 7 GA Zip 30907 E mail JMPoe@drhorton.com Agent's Signature Date 01/15/24 4. I hereby designate the above-named person (Line 3) to serve as my agent and represent me in the referenced application. SEE ATT ACHED SIGNATURE PAGE Owner Signature 01/16/2024 Date 5. Sworn and subscribed to before me on this day of , 20 SEE ATT ACHED SIGNATURE PAGE Notary Public Commission Expiration Date 1/2013 ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 7 of 17 4. I hereby designate the above-named person (Line 3) to serve as my agent and represent me in the referenced application. Owner: Walton South Carolina, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company, in its capacity as agent for and on behalf of the Owners By: Walton International Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation Name: Todd Woodhead Title: Vice President Date: 01/16/2024 5. Sworn and subscribed to before me on this 16th day of January Cx!J Notary Public 08/05/2026 Commission Expiration Date MARICOPA COLINn" I Commission#63544'l I , 20 i ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 8 of 17 ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 9 of 17 ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 10 of 17 STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) PETITION FOR ANNEXATION ) TAX PARCEL NUMBER 011-14-04-045 & 011-19-01-001 COUNTY OF AIKEN ) LOCATED EAST OF EDGEFIELD ROAD ) AND NORTH OF BELVEDERE CLEARWATER ROAD ) OWNED BY WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA, LLC I, the undersigned, as freeholders and owners of property located East of Edgefield Road and North of Belvedere Clearwater Road, Tax Parcel Numbers 011-14-04-045 and 011-19-01-001 do respectfully petition the City Council for the City of North Augusta, South Carolina, for annexation of the hereinafter described property into the municipal corporate limits of the City of North Augusta, South Carolina. This petition is submitted in accordance with Title 5-3-150(3) of the Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, as amended. The property sought to be annexed, inclusive of all adjacent right-of-way, is described as follows: PARCEL 1: A portion of Tract E identified as TMS #011-14-04-045 approximately 1.08 acres in Aiken County on an ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey of Tracts A, B, C, D & E of “The Kellogg Tract” prepared for Walton Global Holdings, LLC and prepared by Thomas & Hutton dated August 8, 2022. Commencing at the intersection of the centerline of Holley Hill Drive and the eastern margin of Edgefield Road (US Highway No. 25), thence south-southwesterly along the eastern margin of Edgefield Road a distance of 660' feet, more or less, to a 2" open top pipe found at the common corner of Cornelia Kennedy and Anthony Riley; thence continuing along the eastern margin of Edgefield Road S 16°40'58" W a distance of 50.17 feet to a 4/8" rebar found at the common corner of Cornelia Kennedy and PARCEL 1; said point being the Point Of Beginning; Thence along the eastern margin of Edgefield Road the following one (1) call: (1) S 16°14'24" W a distance of 60.79 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; Thence with PARCEL 2, other lands of The Kellogg Corporation the following two (2) calls: (1) S 75°06'55" Ea distance of 503.96 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; (2) thence N 19°00'46" Ea distance of 111.57 feet to a 1/2" open top pipe found; Thence with the lands of Anthony Riley the following one (1) call: (1) N 75°09'22" W a distance of 328.97 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; Thence with the lands of Cornelia Kennedy the following two (2) calls: (1) S 16°42'21" W a distance of 50.00 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 11 of 17 (2) thence N 75°12'45" W a distance of 180.00 feet to a point; Said point being the Point Of Beginning. Said parcel containing 1.08 acres more or less. PARCEL 2: A portion of Tract C identified as TMS #011-19-01-001 approximately 374.77 acres in Aiken County on an ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey of Tracts A, B, C, D & E of “The Kellogg Tract” prepared for Walton Global Holdings, LLC and prepared by Thomas & Hutton dated August 8, 2022. Commencing at the intersection of the centerline of Holley Hill Drive and the eastern margin of Edgefield Road (US Highway No. 25), thence south-southwesterly along the eastern margin of Edgefield Road a distance of 660' feet, more or less, to a 2" open top pipe found at the common corner of Cornelia Kennedy and Anthony Riley; thence continuing along the eastern margin of Edgefield Road S 16°40'58" W a distance of 50.17 feet to a 4/8" rebar found at the common corner of Cornelia Kennedy and Parcel 1, other lands of The Kellogg Corporation; thence continuing along the eastern margin of Edgefield Road S 16°14'24" W a distance of 60.79 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set at the common corner of PARCEL 2, other lands of the Kellogg Corporation, and PARCEL 1; said point being the Point Of Beginning; Thence with PARCEL 1, other lands of The Kellogg Corporation the following two (2) calls: (1) S 75°06155" Ea distance of 503.96 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; (2) thence N 19°00146" Ea distance of 111.57 feet to a 1/2" open top pipe found; Thence with the lands of Anthony Riley the following one (1) call: (1) S 74°56122" Ea distance of 482.59 feet to a 1-1/2" open top pipe found; Thence with the various lands of Anthony Riley, Betty Ann Sherlock, and Brenda Sue & Ronald W. Fulmer the following one (1) call: (1) N 17°35102" Ea distance of 866.59 feet to a 1/2" open top pipe found; Thence with the lands of Brighter Side Properties, LLC the following two (2) calls: (1) N 17°44156" Ea distance of 569.09 feet to a 5/8" rebar found; (2) thence N 15°48151" Ea distance of 47.65 feet to a 5/8" rebar found; Thence with the various lands of Bodie, Parker, Etheridge, & Aspinall the following one (1) call: (1) N 18°23154" Ea distance of 395.35 feet to a point; Thence with the lands of Hunter 34, LLC the following eight (8) calls: (1) S 69°45146" Ea distance of 302.09 feet to a 1/2" rod found; (2) thence S 73°3411311 Ea distance of 614.09 feet to a 3/4" open top pipe found; ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 12 of 17 (3) thence N 74°43129" Ea distance of 804.19 feet to al" crimp top pipe found; ( 4) thence S 80° l 8140" E a distance of 280.17 feet to a 1" crimp top pipe found; (5) thence S 69°44'36" Ea distance of 394.88 feet to a 3/4" open top pipe found; (6) thence S 49°47136" Ea distance of 324.03 feet to a 1" crimp top pipe found; (7) thence S 44°28148" Ea distance of 104.74 feet to a 5/8" rebar found; (8) thence S 29°41 129" Ea distance of 29.86 feet to a right-of-way monument found; Thence with the western margin of Interstate 520 (Palmetto Parkway) the following twenty (20) calls: (1) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the left, having an arc length of 353.98 feet, a radius of 10,697.41 feet, a chord length of 353.97 feet, and a chord bearing S 21 °49148" E to a right-of-way monument found; (2) thence S 22°3611511 Ea distance of 159.43 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (3) thence S 34°03157" Ea distance of 195.47 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (4) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 1,073.64 feet, a radius of9,822.38 feet, a chord length of 1,073.10 feet, and a chord bearing S 18°26134" E to a right-of-way monument found; (5) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 634.55 feet, a radius of 9,822.38 feet, a chord length of 634.44 feet, and a chord bearing S 13°27139" E to a right-of-way monument found; (6) thence S 78°30150" W a distance of 30.22 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (7) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 535.13 feet, a radius of 9,730.00 feet, a chord length of 535.06 feet, and a chord bearing S 09°57'36" E to a right-of-way monument found; (8) thence S 00°21 139" W a distance of98.76 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (9) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 96.97 feet, a radius of 9,715.00 feet, a chord length of 96.97 feet, and a chord bearing S 07°3213911 E to a right-of-way monument found; (10) thence S 26°55'00" Ea distance of 103.64 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (11) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 194.52 feet, a radius of 9,750.00 feet, a chord length of 194.52 feet, and a chord bearing S 05°5812911 E to a right-of-way monument found; (12) thence S 09°1315611 W a distance of 201.22 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (13) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 291.06 feet, a radius of 7,339.44 feet, a chord length of 291.04 feet, and a chord bearing S 03°3713711 E to a right-of-way monument found; (14) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 96.85 feet, a radius of7,339.44 feet, a chord length of 96.85 feet, and a chord bearing S 02°0614711 E to a right-of-way monument found; (15) thence S 18°2312611 Ea distance of 306.23 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (16) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 244.50 feet, a radius of 7,429.44 feet, a chord length of 244.49 feet, and a chord bearing S 00°2013011 W to a right-of-way monument found; (17) thence S l 7°3515911 W a distance of 264.75 feet to a right-of-way monument found; ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 13 of 17 (18) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 347.98 feet, a radius of 1,696.59 feet, a chord length of347.37 feet, and a chord bearing S 09°1711411 W to a right-of-way monument found; (19) thence S 00°0015411 E a distance of 321.28 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (20) thence S 24°1912911 W a distance of 42.93 feet to a right-of-way monument found; Thence along the northern margin of Vigilance Way the following two (2) calls: (1) N 34 °2915611 W a distance of 425 .83 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; (2)thence with the arc of a curve turning to the left, having an arc length of 823.07 feet, a radius of 610.46 feet, a chord length of 762.13 feet, and a chord bearing N 73°07'2711 W to a right-of-way disk found; Thence along the northern margin of Belvedere Clearwater Road (SC-126) the following twelve (12) calls: (1) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the left, having an arc length of 36.85 feet, a radius of 1,004.93 feet, a chord length of 36.85 feet, and a chord bearing N 68°0414711 W to a right-of-way disk found; (2) thence N 21 °3011011 Ea distance of 163.42 feet to a right-of-way disk found; (3) thence N 34°3713311 W a distance of 62.69 feet to a right-of-way disk found; (4) thence S 56°5611311 W a distance of 104.06 feet to a right-of-way disk found; (5) thence S 86°31 14711 W a distance of 353.48 feet to a right-of-way disk found; ( 6) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the left, having an arc length of 402.04 feet, a radius of 1,064.93 feet, a chord length of399.66 feet, and a chord bearing S 76°11 10611 W to a right-of-way disk found; (7) thence S 65°2613711 W a distance of 269.91 feet to a right-of-way disk found; (8) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 163 .94 feet, a radius of 3,164.04 feet, a chord length of 163.92 feet, and a chord bearing S 66°5413511 W to a right-of-way disk found; (9) thence S 71 °46'5211 W a distance of 97.04 feet to a right-of-way disk found; (10) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 289 .30 feet, a radius of 3,159.04 feet, a chord length of 289.20 feet, and a chord bearing S 72°54'0911 W to a right-of-way disk found; (11) thence S 52°43'5911 W a distance of 160.00 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; (12) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 321.97 feet, a radius of 3,224.04 feet, a chord length of 321.84 feet, and a chord bearing S 80°52'11 11 W to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; Thence along the lands of Carol Ann S. Long and the lands of various owners within the Heritage Subdivision the following three (3) calls: (1) N 11 °57'23 11 Ea distance of 1,207.66 feet to a 1/211 open top pipe found; (2) thence N 12°22'1211 Ea distance of 680.21 feet to a 3/411 open top pipe found; (3) thence S 82°41'5211 W a distance of 1,357.78 feet to a 3/411 crimp top pipe found in the eastern margin of Wildwood Drive; Thence along the eastern margin of Wildwood Drive and along the lands of Howard Weddle the following one (1) call: ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 14 of 17 (1) N 06°09'0211 Ea distance of 273.17 feet to a 3/411 open top pipe found; Thence along the various lands of Howard Weddle, Sara & Stephen Mundy, and Brandi & Kristian English the following one (1) call: (1) N 56°21'58 11 W a distance of218.75 feet to a l/211 open top pipe found; Thence along the various lands of Brandi & Kristian English the following one (1) call: (1) S 78°31 '22" W a distance of 219.42 feet to a 3/411 open top pipe found; Thence along lands of an unknown owner the following two (2) calls: (1) N 59°41'4711 W a distance of 68.36 feet to a 3/411 crimp top pipe found; (2) thence N 45°36' 1311 W a distance of 56.20 feet to a 1" crimp top pipe found; Thence along various lands of TRC Acres 517, LLC the following six (6) calls: (1) N 17°28'3611 Ea distance of259.78 feet to a 3/411 crimp top pipe found; (2) thence S 87°05'1711 W a distance of 209.96 feet to a 2" open top pipe found; (3) thence N 16°41'5311 Ea distance of 30.62 feet to a 1" open top pipe found; (4) thence N 17°02'2711 Ea distance of256.94 feet to a l/211 open top pipe found; (5) thence N 17°06'4911 Ea distance of 14.93 feet to a 4/8" rebar found; (6) thence N 17°02'3511 Ea distance of 169.90 feet to a 1" open top pipe found; Thence along the lands of the County of Aiken Courthouse Complex the following three (3) calls: (1) N 16°58'1411 Ea distance of92.12 feet to a 2" open top pipe found; (2) thence N 16°59'0211 Ea distance of 106.89 feet to a 3/411 crimp top pipe found; (3) thence N 72°11 '38 11 W a distance of 321.29 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; Thence along the lands of Belvedere Jaycees, Inc. the following one (1) call: (1) N l 7°0014511 Ea distance of 173.21 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; Thence along the lands of the County of Aiken, known as Thomas Park the following three (3) calls: (1) S 70°1515411 Ea distance of 78.47 feet to a 4/8" rebar found; (2) thence N l 7°2310611 Ea distance of 389.39 feet to a 4/8" rebar found; (3) thence N 70°1515411 W a distance of 243.81 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; Thence along the various lands of William Johnson, Jr. and Mary S. & William Johnson, Jr. the following two (2) calls: (1) N 16°3710211 Ea distance of 221.22 feet to an axle found; (2) thence N 75°4311911 W a distance of 501.55 feet to a 1" open top pipe found in the eastern margin of Edgefield Road (U.S. Highway No. 25); Thence proceeding along said eastern margin of Edgefield Road the following two (2) calls: (1) N 18°22'4911 E a distance of 66.89 feet to a 2" open top pipe found; ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 15 of 17 (2) thence N 16°14'2411 Ea distance of 42.94 feet to a point; Said point being the Point Of Beginning. Said portion of PARCEL 2 containing 432.97 acres more or less. TOGETHER WITH Commencing at a 5/8" rebar & cap set in the eastern margin oflnterstate 520 at the common corner between PARC EL 2 and the lands of NAHH, LLC; said corner being the same as shown designated as "IPS 5/8"RB" marking the north corner of the adjacent lands shown as "THE KELLOGG CORP., N/F 16-00-0l-040(PT.) D.B. 524,167-169" on a plat prepared by Site Design, Inc., dated June 6, 2005, last revised October 22, 2009, recorded in Plat Book 54, pages 975 through 983; said point being the Point Of Beginning; Thence with the lands ofNAHH, LLC the following three (3) calls: ( 1) S 39°3111011 E a distance of 896.27 feet to a 1" crimp top pipe found; (2) thence S 11 °2013211 Ea distance of 874.45 feet to a 1/211 open top pipe found; (3) thence S 35°17'1911 W a distance of 1,098.39 feet to a 5/8" rebar & cap set in the eastern margin of Interstate 520 (Palmetto Parkway); Thence with the eastern margin of Interstate 520 (Palmetto Parkway) the following eight (8) calls: (1) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 65.00 feet, a radius of 754.08 feet, a chord length of 64.98 feet, and a chord bearing N 30°0210811 W to a right-of-way monument found; (2) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 323 .09 feet, a radius of 2,201.12 feet, a chord length of 322.80 feet, and a chord bearing N 24°5311711 W to a right-of-way monument found; (3) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the right, having an arc length of 480.02 feet, a radius of2,201.12 feet, a chord length of 479.07 feet, and a chord bearing N 14°26107" W to a 5/8" rebar & cap set; ( 4) thence N 00°31135" E a distance of 189.89 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (5) thence N 01 °25136" W a distance of 395.02 feet to a right-of-way monument found; ( 6) thence N 00°0 l 120" E a distance of 496.80 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (7) thence N 20°07110" Ea distance of 550.71 feet to a right-of-way monument found; (8) thence with the arc of a curve turning to the left, having an arc length of 33.66 feet, a radius of 8,029.44 feet, a chord length of 33.66 feet, and a chord bearing N 02°33134" W to a point; Said point being the Point Of Beginning. Said portion of PARCEL 2 containing 33.12 acres more or less. Total Parcel 2 acreage is approximately 466.09 acres The +381.29 acres is requested to be zoned PD, Planned Development. ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 16 of 17 ATTACHMENT #7 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 17 of 17 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-03 TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA BY REZONING ± 86.12 ACRES OF LAND OWNED BY THE KELLOGG CORPORATION, ET AL, TAX PARCEL NO. 012-08-01-001 FROM CR, CRITICAL AREAS TO PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, on December 18, 2023, by Ordinance 2023-32, the North Augusta City Council adopted the North Augusta Development Code and a citywide Zoning Map which is consistent with the City’s North Augusta 2017 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the property owner, The Kellogg Corporation et al, has requested the property be rezoned from CR, Critical Areas to PD, Planned Development; and WHEREAS, the North Augusta Planning Commission, following a December 18, 2024 public hearing, reviewed and considered a request by Walton South Carolina, LLC to amend the Official Zoning Map of North Augusta from CR, Critical Areas to PD, Planned Development for an approximately ±86.12 acres consisting of tax parcel 012-08-01-001 and has issued their recommendation. The staff reports and the recommendation of the Planning Commission have been provided to City Council. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, IN MEETING DULY ASSEMBLED AND BY THE AUTHORITY THEREOF, THAT: I. A parcel consisting of +86.12 acres owned by the Kellogg Corporation et al, is hereby rezoned from CR, Critical Areas to PD, Planned Development. Said property is Aiken County tax map parcel 012-08-01-001 and specifically identified as Exhibit “B” attached hereto. II The Official Zoning Map for the City of North Augusta is hereby amended to reflect this rezoning. III. All ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed. IV. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption on second and final reading. DONE, RATIFIED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, ON THIS ______ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025. First Reading Briton S. Williams, Mayor Second Reading ATTEST: Jamie Paul, City Clerk ATTACHMENT #8 Page 1 of 2 BE L V E D E R E C L E A R W A T E R M O N T E R E Y VI G ILANCE RIDGEF I E L D CHER O KE E B E L V E D E R E CLE A R W AT E R PA L MET T O PK WY PA L METT O PKW Y E D I S T O PA L M E T T O PAL ME T T O AUDUBO N G E R BE R D AISY P O W E RH OUSE SH ASTA D AISY JA COB SHEFFI E L D N E W C A S T L E BORDE A U X HA M P T O N H A W T H O R N E KARNES BUC H A N A N 03256509751,300162.5 Feet± EXHIBIT B Subject Parcel approx 86.22 ac to be rezoned PD, Planned Development Exhibit B Application Number RZM24-002 Tax Parcel Number 012-08-01-001 A request to rezone approximately 86.22 ac from CR, Critical Areas to PD, Planned Development Map Key Zoning CR GC P PD R-10 Outside City Limits TPN 012-08-01-001 TPN 012-08-01-001 City Limits Path: H:\kbaker\ArcGIS\Rezonings\RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract\RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract.aprx 12/10/2024 ATTACHMENT #8 Page 2 of 2 Department of Planning and Development Project Staff Report RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 SECTION 1: PROJECT SUMMARY Project Name Kellogg Tract Applicant DR Horton, Inc. Address/Location Roughly bound by Edgefield Road, Belvedere Clearwater Road and I-520 Parcel Number 012-08-01-001 Existing Zoning CR, Critical Areas Traffic Impact Tier 2 Proposed Use Planned Development Proposed Zoning PD, Planned Development Future Land Use Mixed Use SECTION 2: PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION Section 18.11 of the North Augusta Development Code (NADC) provides uniform procedures for processing changes to the Official Zoning Map. The Planning Commission must use the criteria established in NADC Section 18.11.5 to evaluate each application. These criteria are further analyzed in Section 6 of this report, but are as follows per NADC Section 18.11.5.1-10: 1. The size of the tract(s) in question. 2. Whether the proposal conforms with and furthers the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, other adopted plans, and the goals, objectives, and policies of this Chapter. Specifically, the Planning Commission shall consider the goals stated in §1.3. 3. The relationship of the uses envisioned under the proposed zoning and the uses currently present in adjacent tracts. Specifically, the Planning Commission shall consider the following questions: ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 1 of 16 Project Staff Report RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 2 of 8 a. Is the proposed rezoning compatible with the surrounding area? b. Will there be any adverse effects on the capacity or safety of the portion of street network influenced by the proposed rezoning? c. Will there be any adverse effects on existing or planned public utility services in the area? d. Will the proposed rezoning cause parking problems? e. Will the proposed rezoning generate environmental impacts such as excessive storm water runoff; water, air, or noise pollution; excessive nighttime lighting; or other nuisances? 4. Any recent change of character in the area due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, deterioration and development. 5. The zoning districts and existing land uses of the surrounding properties. 6. If the subject property is suitable for the uses to which it has been restricted under the existing zoning classification. 7. If the rezoning is compatible with the adjacent neighborhood, especially residential neighborhood stability and character. 8. The length of time the subject property has remained vacant as zoned, if applicable. 9. If there is an adequate supply of land available in the subject area and the surrounding community to accommodate the zoning and community needs including, but not limited to, affordable housing and economic development. 10. If the existing zoning was in error at the time of adoption. As referenced in item (2) above, NADC Section 1.3 states the following: 1.3. Comprehensive Development Code The Development Code as established in this Chapter has been made in accordance with a comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting health, safety, and the general welfare of the community. It is intended to consolidate in one place and in logical order, without unnecessary duplication, the city’s regulations pertaining to land use and development. It is designed to make it possible for all of those concerned with land use and development to have access to all relevant city legislation in one convenient Chapter that is capable of being published and distributed as a separate and comprehensive segment of the Code of Ordinances, City of North Augusta, South Carolina, hereinafter referred to as the City Code, as a whole. The specific objectives of this Chapter are: 1.3.1 To protect the health, safety and general welfare; and 1.3.2 To promote new development forms that complete neighborhoods that: a. Are designed at a human scale by controlling massing and design that respects the architectural vernacular of North Augusta; ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 16 Project Staff Report RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 3 of 8 b. Foster communication among neighbors and connectivity to the larger community by allowing compact development patterns, interconnected street systems, short blocks; c. Include or reinforce central places, such as North Augusta’s traditional downtown and neighborhood commercial centers, civic gathering places, and open space; d. Encourage walking and biking by the layout of blocks and streets; e. Accommodate vehicular travel without allowing parking lots and streets to dominate the built environment; f. Provide a mix of housing types, including housing affordable to all households and housing arrangements that foster neighborliness; g. Provide a variety of spaces, including outdoor and passive outdoor uses, which become part of the public realm; h. Design streets as outdoor rooms, with attention to pedestrian and bicyclist safety as well as to the safety of motorists; i. Includes neighborhood design that responds to the natural, cultural and historic context; j. Protect and preserve places and areas of historical, cultural, or architectural importance and significance; and k. Are the result of a planning process that is inclusive and involves opportunities for negotiation between the designer and the City. Planning Commission Action Requested: The Planning Commission may recommend approval or denial of this request according to NADC § 18.11.4. The Planning Commission’s recommendation is then forwarded to the City Council for their consideration per NADC § 18.11.4.1. SECTION 3: PUBLIC NOTICE Per NADC Article 18, a notice of the rezoning request and scheduled date of the Planning Commission public hearing was originally mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property on November 22, 2024. The property was posted with the required public notice on November 27, 2024. A public notice of the rezoning request and scheduled date of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in The Augusta Chronicle and on the City’s website at www.northaugustasc.gov on November 27, 2024. ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 3 of 16 Project Staff Report RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 4 of 8 SECTION 4: SITE HISTORY The subject property is owned by The Kellogg Corporation and has never been developed. In 2014, the Planning Commission rezoned the Kellogg Tract “Daisy Parcels” North of Gerber Daisy Lane and Shasta Daisy Path from CR, Critical Area to GC, General Commercial. The parcels were previously part of the larger Kellogg property but were split from the larger parent tract with the construction of Palmetto Parkway and the realignment of Belvedere-Clearwater Road. The Planning Commission reviewed a concept plan at the regular meeting of February 21, 2024. The applicant has submitted a concurrent application for a Planned Development General Development Plan and Annexation associated with the project. SECTION 5: EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Subject Parcel Vacant Mixed Use CR, Critical Area/ RD, Residential Multi-Family Development (Aiken County) North Vacant Mixed Use PD, Planned Development South Single-Family Residential Residential Single-Family GC, General Commercial R-10, Medium Lot Single-Family Residential UD, Urban Development (Aiken County) RC, Residential Single-Family Conservation (Aiken County) East I-520/Vacant Mixed Use PD, Planned Development West Single-Family Residential/Commercial Mixed Use UD, Urban Development (Aiken County) RC, Residential Single-Family Conservation (Aiken County) Access – The subject parcel currently has access from Belvedere Clearwater Road and Vigilance Way. Topography – The subject parcel has variable topography. The site drains towards wetlands located near the South East portion of the site. ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 4 of 16 Project Staff Report RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 5 of 8 Utilities – Water and sanitary sewer services must be extended to serve the site. Final capacity analysis will be provided by Engineering and Utilities prior to final permitting. Floodplain – The site is located in an area of minimal flood hazard. Drainage Basin – Upper portions of the site are located in the Mims Branch basin. Due to the almost pristine condition of this basin water quality and stream integrity, it is considered a “representative basin” for comparison with other basins within the city. It is in a primarily undeveloped area and is not impacted by industrial, commercial or residential use. This site is also located partially within the Willow Springs Basin. The Willow Springs Basin has little to no impact on the City of North Augusta. The stream channel bypasses all stormwater systems in the city portions of its reach. SECTION 6: STAFF EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS Staff provides the following information for context related to the Commission’s deliberation. Descriptions and commentary added by staff will be italicized. 1. The size of the tract in question (§18.11.5). The total acreage of the requested rezoning is approximately 86.22 acres. 2. Whether the proposal conforms with and furthers the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, other adopted plans, and the goals, objectives, and policies of the Development Code, §1.2 (§18.11.5.2). The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map shows this parcel as Mixed Use. The proposed development is relatively close to the proposed Alidade Planned Development and will likely service residences in the area. Infill development supports Goal 5.2, Ensure the Financial Sustainability of North Augusta by encouraging compact growth to ensure North Augusta’s tax base can support City services. Developing the City in areas not already served by the City will increase service costs. 3. The relationship of the uses envisioned under the new zoning and the uses currently present in adjacent tracts. In particular, the Planning Commission shall consider whether as stated in NADC §18.11.5.3. a. The proposed rezoning is compatible with the surrounding area; ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 5 of 16 Project Staff Report RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 6 of 8 The surrounding area is an area of transition between the Edgefield Road commercial corridor and the existing residential areas along Belvedere Clearwater Road. b. There will be any adverse effects on the capacity or safety of the portion of street network influenced by the rezoning; Staff recognizes that the development of the Kellogg Tract poses significant traffic impacts to the region. The applicant has submitted a TIA that recommends new traffic signals at the entrance to the development at full build out. Coordination with the Alidade PD is necessary to avoid any negative impact to the Belvedere Clearwater Road corridor. c. There will be any adverse effects on existing or planned public utility services in the area; Any infrastructure improvements must be provided by the developer. A master utility plan has been submitted with the PD application for review by the City Engineer and Public Works department. Full calculations will be required at the time of individual major subdivision preliminary plat or site plan submittals. d. Parking problems; or Parking will be required to meet City standards at the time of site plan or preliminary plat approval. Any waivers or variances must be addressed by the Board of Zoning Appeals, as applicable. Staff does not foresee any parking problems associated with the rezoning request. e. Environmental impacts that the new use will generate such as excessive storm water runoff, water, air, or noise pollution, excessive nighttime lighting or other nuisances. Noise and lighting will be subject to the standards of the Development Code and Municipal Code, as applicable. The developer should take care to preserve the tree canopy in areas slated as open space. The development is within the Willow Wick Basin, which is a SCDHEC designated TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) watershed requiring additional protection. A 50 ft buffer is required by the NADC to protect all wetland areas. 4. Any recent change of character in the area due to the installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, deterioration, and development (§18.11.5.4). ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 6 of 16 Project Staff Report RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 7 of 8 There have not been any recent changes to the character of the surrounding area. The area is prime for development as a major travel corridor between Aiken and Augusta along Belvedere Clearwater Road and towards Hwy 1; however, with the approval of the adjacent Alidade PD, there will be significant growth and development in the area that will impact traffic and public facilities. 5. The zoning districts and existing land uses of the surrounding properties (§18.11.5.5). Surrounding properties are zoned GC, General Commercial, R-10, Medium Lot Single- Family Residential, UD, Urban Development (Aiken County), and RC, Residential Single- Family Conservation (Aiken County). A large portion of the land in the immediate surrounding area to the North is wooded and undeveloped. The South and West are bordered by a mix of single-family detached residences and commercial services and businesses. 6. Whether the subject property is suitable for the uses to which it has been restricted under the existing zoning classification (§18.11.5.6). Should the property be rezoned, it requires a Planned Development General Development Plan to be adopted by City Council. This application is being presented concurrently for review by the Planning Commission. 7. Whether the rezoning is compatible with the adjacent neighborhood, especially residential neighborhood stability and character (§18.11.5.7). The rezoning request is generally compatible with the mix of commercial and residential uses in the adjacent neighborhood. 8. The length of time the subject property has remained vacant as zoned, if applicable (§18.11.5.8). The current site has never been developed. 9. Whether there is an adequate supply of land available in the subject area and the surrounding community to accommodate the zoning and community needs including, but not limited to, affordable housing and economic development (§18.11.5.9). A significant amount of land is available along Belvedere Clearwater Road to develop affordable housing for the community. ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 7 of 16 Project Staff Report RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 8 of 8 10. Whether the existing zoning was in error at the time of adoption (§18.11.5.10). The current zoning of CR, Critical Areas is meant to control development within known areas of the City that are wetlands, water courses, and lands maintained for stormwater management. These environmentally sensitive lands serve as natural wildlife refuge areas and open spaces. Because wetlands are located on the parcel, it does not appear to have been an error at the time of adoption. SECTION 7: RECOMMENDATION The Department has determined the application is complete. Staff recommends that 012-08- 01-001 be rezoned from CR, Critical Area to PD, Planned Development. The Planning Commission may recommend approval or denial of this request according to NADC § 17.4. SECTION 8: ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial 2. Topography 3. Current Zoning 4. Proposed Zoning 5. Public Hearing Notice 6. Application Documents cc Cranston Engineering Group, via email DR Horton, Inc., via email ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 8 of 16 B E L V E D ER E CLE A R W A T E R DUNDEE WI L D WO OD M O N T E R E Y BEL A I R OLDSUDLOWLAKE V I GILANCER I D G E FIE L D CH E R O K E E RHOMB O I D PA L METT O P KWY SW A T H M O R E BUC H A N A N BUC H A N A N PA L METTO PKWY E D I S T O P A L ME T T O CIRCLEVIEW PAL METTO BE L V E D E R E C L E A R W A T E R GERBER DAISY S H AS TA DAI SY HIL L S I D E HA M P T O N AUDUB O N HAMPTON SHEFFI E L D N E W C A S T L E BORDE A U X SP R I N G HOLLEY HILL SPRING GARDE N KARNE S AYR P A L M E T T O P K W Y P A L M E T T O P K W Y 05001,0001,5002,000250 Feet Map Key Zoning CR GC P PD R-10 Outside City Limits TPN 012-08-01-001 TPN 012-08-01-001 City Limits 12/10/2024 Path: H:\kbaker\ArcGIS\Rezonings\RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract\RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract.aprx Exhibit A Application Number RZM24-002 Tax Parcel Number 012-08-01-001 A request to rezone approximately 86.22 ac from CR, Critical Areas to PD, Planned Development ± Subject Parcel approx 86.22 ac to be rezoned PD, Planned Development EXHIBIT AATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 9 of 16 BE L V E D E R E C L E A R W A T E R M O N T E R E Y VI G ILANCE RIDGEF I E L D CHER O KE E B E L V E D E R E CLE A R W AT E R PA L MET T O PK WY PA L METT O PKW Y E D I S T O PA L M E T T O PAL ME T T O AUDUBO N G E R BE R D AISY P O W E RH OUSE SH ASTA D AISY JA COB SHEFFI E L D N E W C A S T L E BORDE A U X HA M P T O N H A W T H O R N E KARNES BUC H A N A N 03256509751,300162.5 Feet± EXHIBIT B Subject Parcel approx 86.22 ac to be rezoned PD, Planned Development Exhibit B Application Number RZM24-002 Tax Parcel Number 012-08-01-001 A request to rezone approximately 86.22 ac from CR, Critical Areas to PD, Planned Development Map Key Zoning CR GC P PD R-10 Outside City Limits TPN 012-08-01-001 TPN 012-08-01-001 City Limits Path: H:\kbaker\ArcGIS\Rezonings\RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract\RZM24-002 Kellogg Tract.aprx 12/10/2024 ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 10 of 16 City of North Augusta, South Carolina Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice The North Augusta Planning Commission will hold its regular monthly meeting at 6:00 PM on Wednesday, December 18, 2024, in the Council Chambers located on the 3rd floor of the North Augusta Municipal Center, 100 Georgia Avenue, to receive public input on the following applications: RZM24-002 – A request by DR Horton, Inc. to rezone ±86.22 acres located along Belvedere Clearwater Road and Vigilance Way, TPN 012-08-01-001, from CR, Critical Areas to PD, Planned Development. PD24-001 – A request by DR Horton, Inc. for approval of a Planned Development General Development Plan affecting ±467 acres roughly bound by I-520, Belvedere Clearwater Road, and Edgefield Road. The property includes TPN 012-08-01-001 currently zoned CR, Critical Areas and proposed to be rezoned PD, Planned Development. The property also includes TPNs 011-19-01-001 and 011-11-14-045 to be annexed into the City of North Augusta and zoned PD, Planned Development. The proposed project is a mixed-use development consisting of a mix of residential and commercial uses. Documents related to the application will be available for public inspection after December 11, 2024 in the office of the Department of Planning and Development on the 2nd floor of the Municipal Center, 100 Georgia Avenue, North Augusta, South Carolina and online at www.northaugustasc.gov. All members of the public interested in expressing a view on these cases are encouraged to attend or provide written comments to planning@northaugustasc.gov by Noon on December 18th. CITIZEN ASSISTANCE: Individuals needing special assistance or a sign interpreter to participate in the meeting are asked to please notify the Department of Planning and Development at 803-441-4221 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 11 of 16 04/15/2024 Jared Poe ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 12 of 16 Designation of Agent Please type or print all information Sotith Carolincls Riuedront This form is required if the property owner is not the applicant. Application Number Staff Use Only Date Received 1. Project Name Kellogg Trac' Project Address/Location 607 Edgef!eld ROad Project Parcel Number(s) 011-19-01-001 and 012-08-01-001 2. Property @Wner Name Walton South Carolina, LLC OwnerPhone 813-951-0003 Mailing Address ssoo N Gainey Center Dr., Suite 345 City Scottsdale ST 42 2jp 85258 Email MikeDoherty@walton.com 3. Designated Agent Jared POe Relationship to Owner BuYer/Pur(tlaser Firm Name D.R. Horton, Inc.Phone 470-991-0177 Agent's Mailing Address 4234 Wheeler Road City Martinez 53 7 GA Zip 30907 E mail JMPoe@drhorton.com Agent's Signature Date 01/15/24 4. I hereby designate the above-named person (Line 3) to serve as my agent and represent me in the referenced application. SEE ATT ACHED SIGNATURE PAGE Owner Signature 01/16/2024 Date 5. Sworn and subscribed to before me on this day of , 20 SEE ATT ACHED SIGNATURE PAGE Notary Public Commission Expiration Date 1/2013 ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 13 of 16 4. I hereby designate the above-named person (Line 3) to serve as my agent and represent me in the referenced application. Owner: Walton South Carolina, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company, in its capacity as agent for and on behalf of the Owners By: Walton International Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation Name: Todd Woodhead Title: Vice President Date: 01/16/2024 5. Sworn and subscribed to before me on this 16th day of January Cx!J Notary Public 08/05/2026 Commission Expiration Date MARICOPA COLINn" I Commission#63544'l I , 20 i ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 14 of 16 ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 15 of 16 ATTACHMENT #8 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 16 of 16 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-04 TO APPROVE THE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE 467 ACRE KELLOGG PLANNED DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF US 25 AND NORTH OF SC 126 WHEREAS, within the guidelines of the North Augusta Zoning and Development Standards Ordinance, a General Development Plan for property within a designated Planned Development zone (PD) requires Planning Commission review and subsequent recommendation to City Council for review and approval; and WHEREAS, an application has been received from DR Horton, INC requesting approval for a General Development Plan for a tract of land zoned Critical Area (CR) containing 86 acres located immediately north of SC 126, east of US 25 and bisected by I-520; and WHEREAS, an application has been received from DR Horton, INC requesting approval for a General Development Plan and annexation of a tract of land in unincorporated Aiken County containing 381 acres located immediately north of SC 126, east of US 25 and bisected by I-520; and WHEREAS, the developer, DR Horton, INC, of Delaware proposes a mixed-use development on three tracts containing a combined acreage of 467 acres. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, IN MEETING DULY ASSEMBLED AND BY THE AUTHORITY THEREOF, THAT: I. The General Development Plan for the 467 acre Kellogg Planned Development is hereby approved as outlined below and as shown on the attached plat and identified as ‘Exhibit A’ as prepared by Cranston LLC, dated November 19, 2024. The General Development Plan Narrative for Kellogg Tract as prepared by Cranston LLC, dated November 19, 2024 attached hereto as ‘Exhibit B’, represents the intent of DR Horton, INC, and addresses the requirements of the Zoning and Development Standards Ordinance for a Planned Development. A. Scope of Development: The scope of development described in the General Development Plan for the Kellogg Planned Development and described herein shall be the maximum level of development allowed. The land uses permitted in the Kellogg Planned Development shall be limited to those described in this ordinance. 1. Minor Modifications: Minor modifications to the development plan and program for valid land use planning reasons, i.e. mix of uses, number and location of buildings, development schedule, setbacks, parking, and ATTACHMENT #9 Page 1 of 29 landscaping, etc., may be approved by the Planning Commission at the time of preliminary plat approval for a tract, subdivision approval for any portion of a tract or site plan approval for an individual parcel. 2. Flex Units: Up to five (5%) percent of the total residential density allocated to a tract may be deducted from the total permitted for that tract and redistributed to one or more other tracts provided the total density of a flex unit recipient tract is not increased by more than ten (10%) percent. Tracts B, Mixed Residential, and C, General Commercial, may be the recipients of flex units. B. Development Program: Plan Designation Description Area in Acres Maximum Density / Intensity Average Density Maximum Units A Single-Family Residential 276 8 dua 3.6 dua 993 units* B Mixed Residential 135 16 dua 6 dua 810 units* C General Commercial 27** 21,780 sf per acre (50%) N/A N/A D Greenspace 29 N/A N/A N/A * The maximum density across the 411 acres allocated to Pods A and B shall not exceed 4.3 dua. This allows for 1763 units max for the development. ** The area allocated to Pod C for commercial use shall not be reduced from 27 acres with any modification to this ordinance. This requirement has been implemented to waive the residential to commercial floor area ratio defined in section 4.12.13.9 – Lot Standards and Buidlable Area (item d) of the North Augusta Development Code. Development Program Definitions: Dua – dwelling units per acre Maximum density – The maximum number of units that may be constructed per acre on a parcel or in a single subdivision excluding open space. Average Density – The total number of units that may be constructed per gross acre. Total Density – The total number of units that may be constructed on a tract. Intensity – The total number of gross square feet of non-residential building that may be constructed per acre. ATTACHMENT #9 Page 2 of 29 C. Permitted Uses: Plan Designation Description Uses A Single-Family Residential Permitted – Single-family residential including detached residential homes (large, medium and small lot); and accessory uses to any permitted use. and accessory uses to any permitted use. B Mixed Residential Permitted – Multi-family residential, duplexes, townhouses, apartments (under 300 units), condominiums, single-family detached homes, patio homes, build-to-rent housing, daycare, education professional, medical and finance office; general business as permitted in General Commercial District of the NADC (Commercial use shall not exceed 30,000 SF of building coverage). Accessory uses to any permitted use. C Commercial Permitted – Professional, medical and financial office; Educational Institutions (primary through graduate, public and private); Churches, places of worship, religious institutions; Primary and secondary and convenience retail; child day care facility; laundry; Drive-through retail; multi- family residential flex units above the first floor if allocated; gasoline service stations; Accessory uses to any permitted use and any use permitted in the General Commercial District of the NADC. Prohibited – Heavy manufacturing; hazardous material storage; salvage operations; adult entertainment; outdoor sales and service of any construction material or heavy equipment. For all uses noise, odor, vibration, glare, vapor, fumes, dust, etc. shall meet or exceed the performance standards prescribed in Section 3.g.4 of the Zoning and Development Standards Ordinance. D Green Space Permitted – To be reserved as undeveloped open space, low impact amenities or utility infrastructure. ATTACHMENT #9 Page 3 of 29 D. Development Standards: Applicable to individual parcel site plans. Minimum Setbacks Use Front (Feet) Rear (Feet) Side (Feet) Height (Feet) (Max.) Impervious Area (Max.) Open Space* (Min.) General Commercial 25 20 10 45 70% 20% Commercial Recreation 50 25 25 35 40% 60% Residential - Single Family Large Lot 5/20 20 8 35 35% N/A - Single Family Medium Lot 5/20*** 15 5 35 40% 10% - Single Family Small Lot/Cottages 5/20*** 15 5 35 50% 10% - Duplexes 20 15 0/8 35 50% 10% - Townhouses** 20 15 0/8 35 70% 20% - Condominiums 25 20 0/20 45 70% 20% - Apartments 25 35 30 45 70% 20% * The minimum open space required in this table relates to the individual development within each pod. At full build out, the property will have a minimum 25% of the total property acreage dedicated to open space. ** Townhouses to have a minimum width of 24’ *** For patio homes, single family homes, townhomes or cottages that have frontage on both subdivision streets and alleys, one front setback may be 5’ to work with grades as needed. One font setback must be 20’ to allow for driveway parking. Definitions and Additional Requirements: • Single-Family Large Lot: Defined as detached lots greater than or equal to 70’ in width to accommodate a product size greater than 54’ in width • Single-Family Medium Lot: Defined as detached lots greater than or equal to 50’ in width to accommodate a product type between 40’ and 53’ in width • Single-Family Small Lot: Defined as lots greater than or equal to 40’ in width to accommodate a product type between 30’ and 39’ in width • Cottage: Defined at detached lots greater than or equal to 30’ in width to accommodate a product type less than 30’ in width. • Garages: Detached products 28’ and larger in width may have 16’ garage widths. Detached products less than 28’ in width may have 8’ garage widths. Attached housing 24’ and larger in width may have 16’ garage widths. Attached housing less than 24’ in width may have 8’ garage widths. This has been implemented to waive the façade coverage requirement defined in section 4.12.13.9 – Architectural Elements (item C) of the NADC. ATTACHMENT #9 Page 4 of 29 E. Plan Approval Process: subsequent to the adoption of this ordinance the following plan approval steps shall be required in the order listed prior to the issuance of any building permits. 1. Master Utility Plan – Master plans for water distribution, sewage collection and stormwater drainage and detention shall be developed in conjunction with the City Utilities Department and City Engineer and approved prior to or coincidental with the initial tract concept plan. The level of detail provided in the master utility plans shall be determined by the Project Engineer, City Engineer and Utilities Director. 2. Wetlands Delineation and Mitigation – A wetlands delineation, permit and any mitigation plans approved by SCDHEC and the US Army Corps of Engineers shall be submitted prior to or coincidental with a Concept Plan for any Tract that contains jurisdictional wetlands. 3. Tract Concept Plan – A concept plan for each tract identified in the General Development Plan shall be prepared for Planning Commission review and approval prior to or coincidental with the first preliminary plat application for each tract. The tract concept plan shall include an overall circulation system design, utility systems designs, anticipated mix and intensity/density of uses, proposed or draft master covenants and restrictions for the tract, and buffer delineation. The tract concept plan must indicate how the development of the tract will interrelate with the other tracts in the Kellogg Tract development. 4. Preliminary Plat – Preliminary plats for sections or phases of each tract will be processed and reviewed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of submittal, this ordinance and the General Development Plan Narrative for Kellogg Tract 5. Final Plat – Final plats for sections or phases of each tract will be processed and reviewed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of submittal and the approved preliminary plat. 6. Site Plan – Site Plans for individual parcels approved in a final plat for any portion of a tract will be processed and reviewed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of submittal, this ordinance and the General Development Plan Narrative for Kellogg Tract. F. Land Dedication: Land dedicated to the City in conjunction with the development will include road rights-of-way, utility lift stations and utility easements with the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect and the time of dedication. The City will also consider accepting the designated ATTACHMENT #9 Page 5 of 29 open space and/or greenspace that the applicant is willing to dedicate in addition to the required dedications. G. Vehicular Access and Circulation: Primary access to the Kellogg Development west of I-520 shall be from US 25 and SC 126 by way of a collector roads. Access to the tract east of I-520 is available from SC 126 although other alternatives may be available with the development of the Highland Springs tract at a later date. Interconnectivity between the various tracts of the development and neighboring tracts and subdivisions shall be provided wherever feasible and practicable. Truck traffic from the commercial tracts through the residential tracts or through adjacent residential areas will be discouraged through roadway, access and circulation system design. 1. Collector Roads - The primary access roads within the project will be the collector roads shown on the General Development Plan. These roads will provide direct access through the development from US 25 to SC 126. A 90-foot right-of-way width will be provided with sidewalk on one side and multi-use path on the other. The General Development Plan shows a typical cross section for this road which is expected to have a 12 feet median, 2 travel lanes with 13 feet of pavement, concrete curb and gutters and no on-street parking. Curb cuts will be limited along these roads and no residential lot frontage or residential driveway cuts will be permitted. 12-foot turn lanes will be provided at the required intersections. Block length requirements shall not apply to these roads as sufficient circulation has been proposed on the GDP. 2. Subcollector Roads - The General Development plan also proposes subcollector roads. These roads will have a 60’ R/W, 26’ of pavement width, concrete curb and gutter, and sidewalk on one side and multi- use path on the other. The purpose of these roads is to traverse the steeper terrain of the site, from the collector road, to provide access to the various residential pods. These will not be lot fronting roads and are intended to be utilized primarily by residents of the community. 3. Local Roads: Access to the individual residential pods from the collector and major subdivision road will be provided by local roads. Local Roads will have a section based on a 50-foot right-of-way with 24 feet of pavement and concrete curb and gutters. This base section would not support on-street parking. Where it is determined that on- street parking is desired, the street section will be widened to accommodate. Cul-de-sac radii for the minor roads will be 40 feet to back of curb. Individual subdivision roads may be designed and constructed to narrower standards provided that such design is in accordance with City guidelines during the approval process. All other design requirements shall follow the CONA development code based on ADT. ATTACHMENT #9 Page 6 of 29 4. Alley Streets: Ally streets will also be incorporated into Pods A and B to allow for rear or side access to cottages, patio homes, and townhomes. These roads will follow the design criteria of the North Augusta Development Code. H. Pedestrian Circulation: All roads in the development shall include pedestrian paths on each side except for alley streets. For the majority of the site this will be concrete sidewalks, however, a multi-use trail will be provided on one side of the collector roads in lieu of the concrete sidewalk. This will provide interconnectivity between the various residential tracts, the General Commercial Tract, parks, commercial recreation uses and any other pedestrian trails in the vicinity. A connection to the I-520 multi use path will also be made. I. Buffers and Landscaping: Landscaped buffers, site landscaping and parking lot landscaping shall be provided in the development as described herein. Landscaping and buffer requirements and standards applicable to each use and tract of the development and not otherwise prescribed in the General Development Plan or this ordinance shall be as prescribed in the applicable Development Code in effect at the time of plan submittal. All buffers shall be landscaped with existing natural vegetation or new plant material or both to create a visual screen. Title to the required buffers shall be retained by a property owners’ association or deed-restricted to prevent a change of use. Minimum buffer requirements between tracts and uses are: 1. Commercial / Residential – A 40’wide type D buffer shall be provided on all commercial tracts as separation from all residential tracts and uses, both internal and external to Kellogg Tract. If tracts are separated by collector road, section I.3 shall govern. 2. Residential / Residential – A 40’ wide buffer planted to type C buffer planting requirements per NADC shall be provided as separation between residential tracts and any other proposed use internal and external to the development. This buffer shall also be provided between single-family detached and any other proposed use and where owner occupied housing meets rental housing. 3. Collector Road – The primary collector roadway in the development shall be bordered by a 40’ wide buffer planted to type D buffer requirements within the Mixed-Residential tracts. In all other tracts the landscaped setback/buffer from the collector road shall be not less than twenty-five (25) feet. Buffers for all roads abutting lots for development shall make use of buffer on property line per NADC 7.4.3.3 4. Subcollector Road – The primary roads from the collector through Pod A shall be bordered by a 30’ wide buffer planted to type C buffer ATTACHMENT #9 Page 7 of 29 requirements. Buffers for all roads abutting lots for development shall make use of buffer on property line per NADC 7.4.3.3 5. SC 126 – The landscaped setback/buffer from SC 126 shall meet the Type C buffer requirement per NADC. 6. Undisturbed natural buffers in equivalent in width to the above shall not require additional planting, if after site clearing they are deemed by North Augusta Planning Director to meet the intent of the buffer requirement. 7. Total street trees requirements will be calculated at the required spacing in the NADC by using centerline length of roadway and subtracting other unplantable area from the total. Street trees may be used interchangeably with lot landscaping trees on local and subcollector roads K. Parking Requirements: All uses shall provide on-site parking as required by the Development Code in effect when submitted for approval The Planning Commission may approve or require less than the minimum specified by the applicable code when an adequate shared parking supply is available and when desirable to minimize or reduce impervious surfaces. L. Applicable Standards for Review: The information contained in the General Development Plan and the General Development Plan Narrative for Kellogg Tract shall supplement the provisions of this ordinance and shall be used in the review of tract concept, subdivision and site plans for projects within Kellogg Tract. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this ordinance and the content of the General Development Plan or the General Development Plan Narrative for Kellogg Tract, the provisions of this ordinance shall prevail. General design criteria and development standards (parking, landscaping, etc.) applicable to each phase of the development and not otherwise prescribed in the General Development Plan, the General Development Plan Narrative or this ordinance shall be as prescribed in the Development Code in effect on the date of submittal. M. The Traffic Impact Analysis titled “Kellogg Tract Traffic Impact Study” for Cranston Engineering dated October, 2024 is included in this ordinance by reference. II. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed. III. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption on second reading. ATTACHMENT #9 Page 8 of 29 DONE, RATIFIED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, ON THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 First Reading Briton S. Williams, Mayor Second Reading ATTEST: Jamie Paul, City Clerk ATTACHMENT #9 Page 9 of 29 EXHIBIT A ATTACHMENT #9 Page 10 of 29 EXHIBIT A ATTACHMENT #9 Page 11 of 29 GENGERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN NARRATIVE FOR KELLOGG TRACT NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared for D.R. Horton, INC 4234 Wheeler Road Martinez, GA 30907 Prepared by November 19, 2024 CEG Job No.: 2023-0382 EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 12 of 29 i Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 General ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of Narrative ............................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 Site Analysis 2.1 Site Characteristics ............................................................................... 2 2.1.1 Location ........................................................................................ 2 2.1.2 Tract Description ............................................................................ 2 2.1.3 Topography and Soils ...................................................................... 2 2.1.4 Wetlands and Sensitive Areas .......................................................... 2 2.1.5 Hydrology ..................................................................................... 3 2.1.6 Flood Plain ..................................................................................... 3 2.2 Existing and Planned Infrastructure ......................................................... 3 2.2.1 Water Service ................................................................................ 3 2.2.2 Sanitary Sewer Service ................................................................... 3 2.2.3 Utility Easements ........................................................................... 4 Chapter 3 Land Use Plan 3.1 General ............................................................................................... 5 3.2 Land Uses ........................................................................................... 5 3.2.1 Commercial ................................................................................... 5 3.2.2 Mixed Residential ........................................................................... 5 3.2.3 Open Space, Parks, Recreational Amenities and Critical areas. .............. 6 3.2.4 Buffers .......................................................................................... 7 3.2.5 Setbacks ....................................................................................... 7 3.3 Marketing Strategy ............................................................................... 8 3.4 Phasing ............................................................................................... 9 Chapter 4 Design Principles 4.1 Interconnectivity ................................................................................ 10 4.1.1 Road System ............................................................................... 10 4.1.2 Pedestrian ................................................................................... 10 4.2 Green Space ...................................................................................... 10 4.3 Riparian Buffer ................................................................................... 11 EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 13 of 29 ii Chapter 5 Required Infrastructure 5.1 Roads ............................................................................................... 12 5.2 Water Service .................................................................................... 13 5.3 Sanitary Sewer Service ....................................................................... 13 5.4 Stormwater Detention ......................................................................... 13 Chapter 6 Development Impacts 6.1 General ............................................................................................. 14 6.2 Surrounding Properties ........................................................................ 14 6.3 Traffic ............................................................................................... 14 6.4 Major Roads ...................................................................................... 15 6.5 Recreational Facilities .......................................................................... 15 6.6 Drainage ........................................................................................... 15 EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 14 of 29 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL The Kellogg Tract Development is a 467-acre tract located partially within the limits of the City of North Augusta and is currently owned by the Kellogg Corporation. The overall property consists of 3 separate tracts identified as County TMPs 011-19- 01-001, 012-08-01-001, and 011-14-04-045. Majority of the property is located directly between Interstate 520 (Palmetto Parkway) and Edgefield Road with two smaller tracts located east of I-520 and north of Belvedere Clearwater Road. Approximately 86 acres of property (TMP 012-08-01-001) are located within city limits and are currently zoned CR. The remaining property is located in unincorporated Aiken County and will be annexed into city limits concurrently with the rezoning. 1.2 PURPOSE OF NARRATIVE The purpose of this Narrative is to describe in writing the factors and characteristics which affect site planning, the existing and proposed infrastructure, the principals utilized in the design of the development, and the specific elements of the proposed plan. It is the intent that this narrative with the General Development Plan drawing will fully suffice to meet the requirements for submittal in the re-zoning of the property to a PD district. EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 15 of 29 2 CHAPTER 2 SITE ANALYSIS 2.1 SITE CHARACTERISTICS 2.1.1 LOCATION The southern portion of the Kellogg Tract is located within the city limits of North Augusta and consists of approximately 86 acres of land. The remaining property to the north is located in unincorporated Aiken County. Properties adjacent to and surrounding the site are located both in the North Augusta city limits and in unincorporated Aiken County. The Kellogg Tract adjoins the new Highland Springs/Alidade development directly to the north and east of the property. The property is bisected by Interstate 520 and located to the east of Highway 25, and north of SC Highway 126 (Belvedere-Clearwater Road). 2.1.2 TRACT DESCRIPTION Kellogg Tract primarily adjoins either residential or undeveloped land that is planned to be the Highland Springs/Alidade development. Portions of the property have gentle to moderate slopes while some of the terrain becomes substantial around the natural wetlands and low-lying draws on the property. The site drains to the tributary running along the east side of Belvedere-Clearwater Road and lies within the Horse Creek drainage basin. The natural ground cover is composed of medium pine and oak trees, together with various other kinds of understory. 2.1.3 TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS The property lies slightly below the intersection of the Piedmont Region and the Coastal Plain, commonly called the Fall Line. A strip of rolling land along this line, known as the Sand Hill encompasses this tract. Due to this circumstance, the soil can vary considerably across the site, but none are expected to provide insurmountable problems to the development of the land. The topography on site varies from essentially flat terrain along the hilltops to steeper terrain falling to the stream, wetlands and natural draws. Elevations on the site range from 490 on the highest hill to 270 at the southern side of the site where the stream leaves the property. 2.1.4 WETLANDS AND SENSITIVE AREAS A wetlands delineation was completed in January 2024 by Nelson Environmental, INC. Approximately 15 acres of wetlands are located on the property and are fed by approximately 266 LF of perennial stream and 280 LF of intermittent stream. There is also an existing pond located near the center of the wetlands that covers approximately 4 acres of property. EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 16 of 29 3 As development work is proposed which would potentially impact wetlands, Federal law requires that the wetlands be field delineated, mapped and submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for concurrence. Then, any impacts such as the filling or piping of wetlands can only be done after a permitting process through the Corps of Engineers. The City of North Augusta also has local regulations in place to protect these sensitive areas. 2.1.5 HYDROLOGY The City of North Augusta has adopted regulations which require that water flows during storm events from a given site not be increased onto downstream properties as a result of the development. Thus, nearly all developments have stormwater detention facilities where the excess runoff is stored for slower release downstream. 2.1.6 FLOOD PLAIN The presence of a recognized 100-year floodplain can have substantial impact to the planning for development of tract of land. Most local ordinances prohibit development in the floodway and limit development in the floodplain fringe. According to Flood Insurance Map Panel Nos. 45003-C0312E, 45003-C0316E, and 45003 C318E, this property does not have an established 100-year floodplain. 2.2 EXISTING AND PLANNED INFRASTRUCTURE 2.2.1 WATER SERVICE Water service to Kellogg Tract will be provided by the City of North Augusta. There is currently a 24-inch main that runs parallel to the Colonial Pipeline easement on the neighboring Highland Springs property. This line will serve the tract east of Interstate 520. There is a 6” main that runs along Edgefield Road that will be looped through the property west of 520 to the existing 8” main on Belvedere Clearwater Road. If additional pressure is required to serve the development, new lines could be brought from the 92-acre tract to the north which has a planned loop from the 12” main north of the 25 connector to the 6” main on Edgefield Road. Another alternative would be to extend a new line from the 24” main where it crosses Belvedere-Clearwater Road to the east of the property. The exact routing of a new water service will be determined with the first section of development and sufficient service is readily available for the development. 2.2.2 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE A sanitary sewer trunk main was extended by the City of North Augusta on the neighboring Highland Springs property along Mims Branch from the Horse Creek Treatment Facility to Old Sudlow Lake Road in the mid-2000s. This line was designed to provide service to Highland Springs development and surrounding areas which includes the Kellogg Tract. The trunk will be accessed by new on-site pump stations and off-site force main which will be routed down Belvedere- Clearwater Road and Old Sudlow Lake Road. EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 17 of 29 4 2.2.3 UTILITY EASEMENTS The only known easements on this property is a Dominion Energy over head power easement boarding the tract east of Interstate 520. Should any work be required within their easement, an encroachment permit will be obtained from the utility provider. EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 18 of 29 5 CHAPTER 3 LAND USE PLAN 3.1 GENERAL The General Development Plan pictorially shows the elements of the proposed planned development. The plan has been developed around two main roads, one which follows a north south orientation and one that follows an east west orientation through what will traverse the main residential area. The development plan also shows a commercial area along Belvedere Clearwater Road. The rest of the development is made up of single family and mixed residential. 3.2 LAND USES 3.2.1 COMMERCIAL The area shown as C on the plan will be for commercial use. The 27 acres are intended to be developed with uses allowed for general commercial, such as shopping centers, grocery stores, retail, uses permitted in CONA General Commercial district, etc. 3.2.2 MIXED RESIDENTIAL The areas shown as A and B are planned as mixed residential uses and comprised of some 411 acres. Designation A consist of 276 acres and is expected to have single-family detached lots. This pod is planned for a maximum density of 8 units/acre with an average density of 3.6 units/acre. This allows for a maximum of 993 detached units in Pod A. Designation B consist of 135 acres and is expected to include more densely developed uses including single-family, patio homes/cottages, duplexes, town homes, apartments, and condominiums. These areas are expected to have a maximum density of 16 units/acre with an average density of 6 units/acre. This allows for a maximum of 810 residential units in Pod B. The maximum number of apartment units permitted in Pod B is 300 units. Pod B also permits some minor commercial use. This will be limited to uses permitted under the General Commercial district and the maximum building coverage shall not exceed 30,000 SF in all of Pod B if incorporated. The average density across the 411 acres of mixed residential shall not exceed 4.3 units/acre. This allows for a maximum of 1763 units in pods A and B collectively. The GDP proposes multiple pods to be developed in areas A and B. These pods have been delineated based on early planning exercises considering terrain and anticipated utilities, stormwater and roadway infrastructure. Table 1 also references various design standards for each residential use. The current master plan proposes the following residential uses in each pod: EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 19 of 29 6 · Pod A-1: Single-Family Medium Lot; Single-Family Small Lot; Patio Homes · Pod A-2: Single-Family Medium Lot; Single-Family Small Lot; Patio Homes · Pod A-3: Single-Family Large Lot; Single-Family Medium Lot · Pod A-4: Single-Family Small Lot · Pod B-1: Single-Family Small Lot; Cottages; Townhomes · Pod B-2: Single-Family Small Lot; Cottages · Pod B-3: Single-Family Small Lot; Cottages Other uses, such as multi-family residential, condominiums and general commercial are permitted in Pod B with limitations. If these uses are proposed during development, it would be expected they be developed with Pod B-1. Architectural elements include slab construction, masonry, fiber cement siding, and vinyl siding or a combination thereof. Some of the larger single-family detached housing will have garages. Size, placement, and access to garages for the single- family, detached dwellings will be determined and regulated by the developer and/or the builder. Townhome and multi-family units will have front facing garages as follows: for units with widths less than 24 feet an 8-foot garage is allowed, for units with widths equal to or greater than 24 feet a 16-foot garage is allowed. Townhome garages are expected to be provided on the exterior units, but this could change depending on the demand of the market. All mixed residential areas could include some neighborhood commercial such as professional, educational, church, childcare, grocery, laundry, convenience store, etc. 3.2.3 OPEN SPACE, PARKS, RECREATIONAL AMENITIES AND CRITICAL AREAS. As seen on the Plan, approximately 29 acres of property are designated to area designation D which encompasses the wetlands, 50-foot wetland buffer, and other surrounding areas. The 86-acres of property within City limits currently zoned Critical Area (CR) only covers approximately 7 of the 18-acres of environmentally sensitive areas on-site. The property located within pod D will be primarily reserved for passive greenspace. This area may include some low impact development such as walking trails, gazebos, picnic areas, etc. Per section 3.2.6 below, the impervious surfaces in this area shall not exceed 2 acres in total. There may also be a need to install some necessary, but minimal, sewer infrastructure in this area such as, a pump station, underground piping and a potential aerial crossing, due to the nature of the terrain on-site. The purpose of this area designation is to maintain the original intent of the Critical Area zoning by protecting the sensitive areas on-site and maintaining the natural ecosystem to the best extent possible. Allowing for some minor development of amenities will allow this area to be utilized and enjoyed by the community. In addition to designation D, recreational amenities and/or parks will be incorporated into the residential areas. The actual planning and development of these parks or amenities will be undertaken as various sections of the development progress. It is anticipated that portions of the parks will include more formalized features such as swings and other playground type of equipment, whereas other EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 20 of 29 7 portions will consist of more passive areas including trails and natural vegetation. A centralized amenity site in the mixed residential area is also anticipated for the development. This amenity site is expected to encompass approximately 5 to 6 acres of property in Pod B-2 and will include features such as a pool, clubhouse, tennis, pickleball, volleyball, picnic areas, etc. This site is expected to be constructed after the first 400 lots are developed. 3.2.4 BUFFERS The plan indicates certain buffers which are intended to help ease the transition from areas of differing uses. In general, the commercial area to the south will have 50-foot buffers where it abuts a residential use or neighboring properties. 40-foot buffers are called for where single family areas abut neighboring residential properties. 40-foot buffers will also be provided along the main spine roads while 30’ buffers will be provided along the subcollector roads. Riparian buffers will also be provided around environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams and drainage ways. Refer to section 4.3 for additional information. 3.2.5 SETBACKS Setbacks for the various areas within the tract are shown in Table 2. In addition to the setbacks as prescribed in Table 2 the side setback from adjoining residential districts will be 30 feet and from all other districts 10 feet. Front setbacks on single family detached and attached lots shall allow for a driveway of 18’ in length to provide room for parking. 3.2.6 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES Limitations on impervious surface ratios will be enforced based on proposed use as outlined in table 1 below. The percentages in the table provide the maximum impervious area allowed for each use as the property is subdivided and developed as separate tracts. If a mix of lot types is proposed in a tract, calculations shall be provided to determine the average impervious area allowed based on unit distribution across each pod. Impervious area will also be limited based on land use allocation. The maximum impervious area across each pod shall be as follows: · Pods A & B (residential): 35% · Pod C (Commercial): 50% · Pod D (Greenspace): 6% EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 21 of 29 8 TABLE 1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Use Setbacks Impervious Area (Max) Open Space (Min)(1) Permitted Plan Designation Front Rear Side Commercial 25 20 10 70% 20% C, B(8) Residential - Single-Family Large Lot(4) 25 20 8 35% 10% A, B - Single-Family Medium Lot(5) 5/20(3) 20 5 40% 10% A, B - Single-Family Small Lot(6) 5/20(3) 15 5 50% 10% A, B - Cottage(7) 5/20(3) 15 5 50% 10% B - Single-Family Attached(2) 20 20 0/8 70% 20% B - Apartments/Multi-Family 20 35 30 70% 20% B, C(8) (1) The minimum open space required in this table relates to the individual development within each pod. At full build out, the property will have a minimum 25% of the total property acreage (117 acres) dedicated to open space. (2) The minimum width of townhomes shall be 24’. (3) For detached lots that have frontage on both subdivision streets and alleys, one front setback may be 5’ to work with grades as needed. (4) Single-Family Large Lot: Defined as detached lots greater than or equal to 70’ in width to accommodate a product size greater than 54’ in width (5) Single-Family Medium Lot: Defined as detached lots greater than or equal to 50’ in width to accommodate a product type between 40’ and 53’ in width (6) Single-Family Small Lot: Defined as lots greater than or equal to 40’ in width to accommodate a product type between 30’ and 39’ in width (7) Cottage: Defined at detached lots greater than or equal to 30’ in width to accommodate a product type less than 30’ in width. (8) Refer to section 3.2.2 for commercial and multi-family restrictions in pods B and C. 3.3 MARKETING STRATEGY It is anticipated that the owner of this tract will develop the portions of the primary collector roads initially to establish some necessary road and utility infrastructure. From there the marketing strategy will be dictated by the economy and market conditions. The mixed residential pods will likely be developed in 40-or 50-acre tracts, or larger, to establish lots and residents within the community. These individual tracts will likely then be developed in stages as the market dictates by EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 22 of 29 9 the developer. It is understood that at the time of development of the 40-to 50- acre tracts, issues concerning circulation, density, conformance to pod maximum and average densities, etc., will be addressed during the North Augusta approval process. The developer will likely sell the commercial area to other developers that specialize in this type of development. The developer may also wish to sell tracts in designation A and B to other developers, it is anticipated that each of these areas will have its own Property Owners Association (POA) when sold. Each developer of individual tracts will be responsible for property management of that individual parcel as well as development of design plans, permitting of individual sections of the land according to North Augusta ordinances and the overall development of that tract within the framework of this planned development. 3.4 PHASING The phasing of such a large tract of land is primarily dependent upon market forces as they affect the type of product which the buyers desire and the rate at which buyers acquire the various products. Nonetheless, a phasing program has been included on the General Development Plan. In general, it is anticipated that the initial phase of the development will be directed toward the installing portions of the collector road from SC 126 and required utility infrastructure. The timing of completing the collector roads from Edgefield Road to Belvedere Clearwater Road should be dictated by the traffic study depending on projected traffic patterns. The second phase is anticipated to be residential and developed around the construction of the sewer trunks that will run from the end of the low-lying wetlands. The commercial areas are expected to be developed shortly after the initial phase or the first phases of residential depending on the market. Due to the volatility of the economy, the description of the future phases of development is difficult to define. EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 23 of 29 10 CHAPTER 4 DESIGN PRINCIPLES 4.1 INTERCONNECTIVITY 4.1.1 ROAD SYSTEM It is the intent of this Plan that portions of the collector road be installed first with the residential areas planned to provide access to the individual pods. This will also allow the developer to run the necessary utility infrastructure down the proposed right-of-way to serve the development. A master traffic impact analysis has been completed and is based on unit counts and uses proposed on the current master plan. This study analyzes the impacts of traffic generated from the development to existing roadways and outlines the required recommendations for off-site and access improvements. As the development progresses and variations to the master plan occur, amendments to the TIA shall be completed. Internal traffic patterns will also be analyzed with sections of development to determine required improvements on-site, as well as the necessary timing of required roadway infrastructure within the development. 4.1.2 PEDESTRIAN All roads will have pedestrian paths on both sides of the road which will provide interconnectivity of the various development pods. For the majority of the site, these paths will be concrete sidewalks. However, the collector and subcollector roads will have 8’ multi-use path on one side and concrete sidewalk on the other. Connectivity to the I-520 multi-use path is also desired by the developer from the site. This is expected to occur with the development of Pods A-2 and A-3. The General Development Plan schematically shows the nature of the pedestrian routes, but the actual design and location will depend on the layout of individual pods. 4.2 GREEN SPACE As mentioned in Section 3.2.6, the Plan reserves approximately 29 acres of property in pod D to designated greenspace surrounding the wetlands. Common open space areas will also be incorporated into pods A, B and C as defined in table 1. At full build out, the development shall have a minimum of 25% open space (117 acres) across the entire property. Green space will include buffers and other green areas which will be associated with the internal development of various pods. It is the intent of the Plan that green spaces be provided to enhance the quality of life for all residents in the development. At least 20% of residences should be within 1000’ of open, parks or the greenway. At the time of individual pod development, issues of green space will be further defined and calculated so as to conform to City standards. EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 24 of 29 11 4.3 RIPARIAN BUFFER It is acknowledged that the City of North Augusta requires a riparian buffer of 50 feet on each side of drainage ways, streams and wetlands. It is evident that several natural draws run through the property, to the wetlands, which drain surrounding properties as well as the I-520 corridor. Due to the nature of the site, several ponds and sanitary sewer utilities are expected to be located in these depressions where jurisdictional streams or wetlands have not been identified. Several strategic road crossings will also be required to allow for access to various portions of the property and interconnectivity through the development. Aside from these improvements, these drainage ways will be left natural to the best extent possible to allow water to flow naturally through the development to the proposed ponds and ultimately to the wetlands. In some cases, improvements to these depressions will need to be implemented. This may involve defining and stabilizing channels appropriately to control stormwater through areas of development. At the time of preliminary plat approval, the City will consider accepting the designated open space that the applicant is willing to dedicate in addition to the required dedication. The site lies in both the Willow Wick Basin and Horse Creek drainage basins. Both basins are studied and monitored for TMDL of specified pollutants. Additional protection measures in accordance with section 13.2 of the NADC will be considered during design and development around the wetlands. If encroachments to the 50’ undisturbed buffer are proposed within reason, the appropriate design measures will be taken to achieve buffer encroachment approval. The City also requires a mandatory 25’ undisturbed buffer around the wetlands which shall be maintained aside from work associated with required sanitary sewer infrastructure. EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 25 of 29 12 CHAPTER 5 REQUIRED INFRASTRUCTURE 5.1 ROADS The primary roads within the project will be the collector and subcollector roads shown on the General Development Plan. The collector roads will have a 90-foot right-of-way with sidewalk on one side and multi-use path on the other. The General Development Plan shows a typical cross section for this road which is expected to have a 12’ center cut median, two travel lanes with 13 feet of pavement and concrete curb and gutters and no on-street parking. Curb cuts will be limited along these roads and no residential driveway connections will be permitted. 12-foot turn lanes will also be provided at the required intersections. The General Development plan also proposes subcollector roads. These roads will have a 60-foot right-of-way with sidewalk on one side and multi-use path on the other. The purpose of these roads is to traverse the steeper terrain of the site from the collector road and to provide access to the various residential pods. These will not be lot fronting roads and no residential driveway cuts will be permitted. These roads are intended to be utilized primarily by residents of the community. Some rear ally streets will also be incorporated into Pods A and B to allow for rear access to cottages, patio homes, and townhomes. These roads will follow the design criteria of the North Augusta Development Code. The remaining roads shown on the Plan will be subdivision roads depending upon final design and traffic counts. The individual subdivision roads will have a section based on a 50-foot right-of-way with 24 feet of pavement and concrete curb and gutters. This base section would not support on-street parking. Where it is determined that on-street parking is desired, the street section will be widened to accommodate. Cul-de-sac radii for the minor roads will be 40 feet to back of curb. Individual subdivision roads may be designed and constructed to narrower standards provided that such design is in accordance with City guidelines during the approval process. As required by NADC 4.12.13.9, two additional elements shall be implemented to qualify for zoning to the PD district. The multi-use path will be provided on collector and major subdivision roads in lieu of a bike lane. This will also provide a connection to the 520 greenway to promote its use. Also, customized entries will be provided at the proposed connection to SC126 and US25. If this cannot be provided at these entries due to signalize intersection restraints, the alternative will be to provide customized entries at all connections of the local and subcollector roads to the connector road. These approximate locations have been shown on the GDP for reference but may change slightly in design once the exact location of driveways are determined. EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 26 of 29 13 5.2 WATER SERVICE Water service will be obtained from the City of North Augusta. Individual areas to be developed will be designed such that water lines are looped and cross connected to the various areas to provide a reinforced system throughout the tract. Water systems will be designed according to South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control requirements as well as those of the City of North Augusta. Simultaneously with the first phase of development a master overall water plan will be submitted to the City for approval. The plan will show the general concept for main lines but will not have details of individual lots since these will be developed in phases. 5.3 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE Sanitary sewer service for the majority of the development will be by gravity flow to a new pump station to be located on-site. The pump station will feed a force main that will be routed to the existing sanitary trunk main located at Old Sudlow Lake Road and Mimms Branch. All sanitary sewer extensions will be designed in accordance with the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control and City of North Augusta guidelines. Simultaneously with the first phase of development a master overall sewer plan will be submitted to the City for approval. The plan will show the general concept for the main sewer but will not have details of individual pods since these will be developed at the time that 40-to-50-acre tracts are developed. 5.4 STORMWATER DETENTION While the final stormwater detention for the entire tract may ultimately be provided by some regional ponds, early development in both the residential and commercial sections may require individual/temporary detention ponds. Such facilities will be designed as needed and will be done according to the City of North Augusta standards. Most of the detention on-site will be positioned in the natural draws near the end of the wetlands. These ponds will be designed to handle off-site flows and address stormwater quality and quantity. EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 27 of 29 14 CHAPTER 6 DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS 6.1 GENERAL The development of a large tract of land, by its nature, can impact the surrounding areas and property owners. The influx of a large number of new homeowners can affect traffic, utilities, recreational facilities, schools and other factors. 6.2 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES The development of Kellogg Tract is not anticipated to directly affect the majority of surrounding properties. Approximately 27 acres is intended to be general commercial. This will provide an asset to surrounding residential property. This development is planned at Belvedere Clearwater Road and will be developed on the east side of the Ridgefield Drive connection to provide separation from existing residences. The bulk of the remaining surrounding lands is already residential and should be compatible with the residential uses proposed. Where higher density residential, such as mixed residential is developed, buffers will be provided. Finally, in areas where commercial is developed on the tract, these facilities will be compatible with single family residential uses and will provide an asset for the use of residents located near Highland Springs/Alidade. It is anticipated that the proposed development will enhance rather than detract from property values of surrounding lands. 6.3 TRAFFIC The influx of some 1,763 (maximum expected) residential units, some 1,000 (maximum expected) employees and outside customers of neighborhood business obviously increases traffic. Fortunately, the collector roads will facilitate the movement of the traffic to the major and minor arterial roads of U.S. 25 and Belvedere Clearwater Road. Nonetheless, the presence of these roads should help the internal traffic generated by the development to have less impact on surrounding roads. There undoubtedly will be increases to the traffic counts. A master traffic impact study has been prepared by Kimley-Horn titled “Kellogg Tract Traffic Impact Analysis” and dated October, 2024. This traffic study will be submitted for review, and approved by local and state regulators prior to beginning the first section of development. This study analyzes the impact of traffic generated onto adjacent roadways for the development in its entirety based on the current master plan. The current master plan accounts for 1268 residential units and 74,000 SF of commercial use as defined in the TIA. There is some opportunity for additional units to be incorporated with changes in the demand of the market. If this occurs, amendments to the TIA will be required. Based on previous experience, it is more beneficial to analyze the timing of recommended mitigation and internal traffic once EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 28 of 29 15 some initial design has occurred and master plan has been modified. This will provide better clarity on required phasing and density of the development. This will also allow for some of the internal traffic patterns to be analyzed to determine requirements for on-site infrastructure. 6.4 MAJOR ROADS The major roads impacted by the development are U.S. 25 and Belvedere- Clearwater Road. U.S. 25 has fairly heavy traffic during parts of the day and the proposed development will add to that number. Traffic along Belvedere clearwater road is expected to increase rapidly based on the anticipated development coming to this area. However, the proposed entrance has close proximity to the 520 interchange and will allow traffic to access the interstate quickly from the site. Both roads are 4-lane roadways with center left turn lane, and it is not likely that the volume of traffic to be generated from the Kellogg Tract development will cause the number of lanes to increase. 6.5 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES There are no known North Augusta Recreational Facilities in close proximity to the project tract. However, the inclusion of a number of parks, amenities and green areas associated with the Kellogg Tract Development provides for such facilities to be in close proximity to the future residents. Thus, the development should not adversely affect the existing recreational facilities. 6.6 DRAINAGE The property general drains towards the wetlands on-site which flow to a pipe under Interstate 520 ultimately reaching Horse Creek by way of an unnamed tributary. It is intended that the development will have several detention ponds to control stormwater runoff quantity and quality from the developed site. Some of the ponds may be considered regional based on design and drainage area. The design of each section of the development will need to analyze runoff to meet the City of North Augusta Standards. While this property has potential for substantial development due to its size, there are several natural drainage ways through the property that convey stormwater from the surrounding properties bounded by Edgefield Road, Belvedere Clearwater Road and Interstate 520 to the wetlands. Although these draws were reported to be mostly dry in the recent wetland delineation, it is intended to leave these areas natural to the best extent possible as mentioned in Section 4.3. This will allow water to follow its natural course through the site to the wetlands. EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT #9 Page 29 of 29 Department of Planning and Development Project Staff Report PD24-001 Kellogg Tract Planned Development Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 1 SECTION 1: PROJECT SUMMARY Project Name Kellogg Tract Planned Development Applicant Walton South Carolina, LLC Engineer Burt Fine, Cranston Engineering Address/Location Roughly bound by Edgefield Road, Belvedere Clearwater Road, and I-520s Parcel Numbers 011-14-04-045, 011-19-01-001, and 012-08-01-001 SECTION 2: PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION The plans have been submitted for review by the Planning Commission based on the following portions of the Development Code: Article 4, Zoning District, Section 4.12.43 Planned Development District and Article 17, Administrative Roles and Responsibilities, Section 17.4, Planning Commission. SECTION 3: PUBLIC NOTICE The notification requirements for each type of application for development approval are provided in rules of procedure adopted by the decision-making authority, in South Carolina statutes, or in the Administrative Manual. Notice of the Planned Development General Development Plan request and scheduled date of the Planning Commission public hearing was originally mailed to property owners within 200 feet of the subject property on November 22, 2024. The property was posted with the required public notice on November 27, 2024. A public notice of the rezoning request and scheduled date of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in The Augusta Chronicle and on the City’s website at www.northaugustasc.gov on November 27, 2024. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 1 of 198 Project Staff Report PD24-001 Kellogg Tract Planned Development Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 2 of 10 SECTION 4: SITE HISTORY The subject property is owned by The Kellogg Corporation and has never been developed. In 2014, the Planning Commission rezoned the Kellogg Tract “Daisy Parcels” North of Gerber Daisy Lane and Shasta Daisy Path from CR, Critical Area to GC, General Commercial. The parcels were previously part of the larger Kellogg property but were split from the larger parent tract with the construction of Palmetto Parkway and the realignment of Belvedere-Clearwater Road. The Planning Commission reviewed a concept plan at the regular meeting of February 21, 2024. The applicant has submitted a concurrent application for a rezoning and annexation associated with the project. SECTION 5: EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Subject Parcel Vacant Mixed Use CR, Critical Area/ RD, Residential Multi-Family Development (Aiken County) North Vacant Mixed Use PD, Planned Development South Single-Family Residential Residential Single-Family GC, General Commercial R-10, Medium Lot Single-Family Residential UD, Urban Development (Aiken County) RC, Residential Single-Family Conservation (Aiken County) East I-520/Vacant Mixed Use PD, Planned Development West Single-Family Residential/Commercial Mixed Use UD, Urban Development (Aiken County) RC, Residential Single-Family Conservation (Aiken County) Access – The subject parcel currently has access from Belvedere Clearwater Road and Byrnes Road off Edgefield Road. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 2 of 198 Project Staff Report PD24-001 Kellogg Tract Planned Development Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 3 of 10 Topography – The subject parcel has variable topography. The site drains towards wetlands located near the South East portion of the site. Utilities – Water and sanitary sewer services must be extended to serve the site. Final capacity analysis will be provided by Engineering and Utilities prior to final permitting. Floodplain – The site is located in an area of minimal flood hazard. Drainage Basin – Upper portions of the site are located in the Mims Branch basin. Due to the almost pristine condition of this basin water quality and stream integrity, it is considered a “representative basin” for comparison with other basins within the city. It is in a primarily undeveloped area and is not impacted by industrial, commercial or residential use. This site is also located partially within the Willow Springs Basin. The Willow Springs Basin has little to no impact on the City of North Augusta. The stream channel bypasses all stormwater systems in the city portions of its reach. SECTION 6: STAFF EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS The Kellogg Tract Development is a 467-acre tract owned by the Kellogg Corporation and partially within the City Limits of North Augusta. The portion of the project currently within the City Limits is approximately 86 acres, with the remaining property being located in unincorporated Aiken County. The applicant has submitted a concurrent application for a rezoning and annexation associated with the project. The property is generally located between I-520, Edgefield Road, and Belvedere Clearwater Road. The applicant proposes 27 acres to be allocated for commercial uses such as shopping centers, grocery stores and retail uses allowed in the General Commercial zoning district. Approximately 276 acres will be designated as mixed residential to include a maximum of 993 single-family detached units in Pod A and 810 residences including single-family, patio homes, duplexes, townhomes, apartments, and condos in Pod B. The maximum number of apartment units allowed in Pod B is 300. In addition to mixed residential uses, Pod B also allows for up to 30,000 sf of commercial uses. The project narrative allows for a maximum of 1763 residential uses. The average density shall not exceed 4.3 units per acre. A minimum of 25% of open space (approximately 117 acres) will be maintained across the property at full buildout to protect wetland areas. A multi-use path and divided median on collector roads will be provided. The multi-use path will connect to the I-520 Greeneway to promote its use as an amenity. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 3 of 198 Project Staff Report PD24-001 Kellogg Tract Planned Development Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 4 of 10 Staff has outlined definitions and processes from the North Augusta Development Code that apply to this project for review and consideration below. Staff commentary is provided in italics. NADC Planned Development Definition Planned Development (PD). A development of land within a planned development district as defined by S.C. Title 6. S.C. State Code Definitions SECTION 6-29-720. Zoning districts; matters regulated; uniformity; zoning techniques. (4) "planned development district" or a development project comprised of housing of different types and densities and of compatible commercial uses, or shopping centers, office parks, and mixed-use developments. A planned development district is established by rezoning prior to development and is characterized by a unified site design for a mixed-use development; The concept plan submitted by the developer generally complies with the definition of a PD provided in the State Code. SECTION 6-29-740. Planned development districts. In order to achieve the objectives of the comprehensive plan of the locality and to allow flexibility in development that will result in improved design, character, and quality of new mixed use developments and preserve natural and scenic features of open spaces, the local governing authority may provide for the establishment of planned development districts as amendments to a locally adopted zoning ordinance and official zoning map. The adopted planned development map is the zoning district map for the property. The planned development provisions must encourage innovative site planning for residential, commercial, institutional, and industrial developments within planned development districts. Planned development districts may provide for variations from other ordinances and the regulations of other established zoning districts concerning use, setbacks, lot size, density, bulk, and other requirements to accommodate flexibility in the arrangement of uses for the general purpose of promoting and protecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. Amendments to a planned development district may be authorized by ordinance of the governing authority after recommendation from the planning commission. These amendments constitute zoning ordinance amendments and must follow prescribed procedures for the amendments. The adopted plan may include a method for minor modifications to the site plan or development provisions. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 4 of 198 Project Staff Report PD24-001 Kellogg Tract Planned Development Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 5 of 10 Planned Development District Purpose The purpose of the PD District is to encourage flexibility in the development of land to promote its appropriate use; to improve the design, character and quality of new development; to facilitate the provision of streets and utilities; and to preserve the natural and scenic features of open space. This district is intended for use in the undeveloped areas of the city where planned development offers a superior response to less coordinated single-lot development as permitted elsewhere in this Chapter. A PD district is specifically intended for development projects including housing of different types and densities and of compatible commercial uses, shopping centers, office parks, and mixed-use developments characterized by a unified site design for a mixed use development. Planned Development District Eligibility Criteria In order to qualify as a PD District a project request shall meet the following requirements: a. The site shall be in single ownership or control, or if in several ownerships, the application for amendment to this Chapter shall be filed jointly by all of the owners. b. The site shall contain not less than ten acres. c. The proposed development shall be consistent with the North Augusta Comprehensive Plan. d. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed development accomplishes the objectives of §1.2 of this Chapter to a greater extent than land developed under any other zoning district, including a base zoning district or a TND District. The North Augusta Development Code requires Planned Development sites to be a minimum ten (10) acres in area. The subject property is ±467 acres in size. The proposed development a mix of housing types, commercial uses, community amenities, and a Greeneway connection. Based on the proposed uses, general layout proposed, the implementation of infill development and the interconnectivity of multiple developments with the existing infrastructure, the proposed project generally complements the existing and anticipated future mixed-use development in the area. Planned Development District Establishment Processes a. The creation of a PD District designation involving both a rezoning and General Development Plan approval. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 5 of 198 Project Staff Report PD24-001 Kellogg Tract Planned Development Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 6 of 10 The Kellogg Tract project includes an annexation, rezoning, and Planned Development General Development Plan application that are being presented concurrently to the Planning Commission. b. A PD District may be established on the Official Zoning Map in the manner prescribed in §3.2 only after a General Development Plan that complies with section 5.7 has been reviewed and recommended by the Planning Commission to the City Council for approval. Parcels of land that were zoned PD prior to the effective date of this section and for which a General Development Plan has been approved may continue to be developed in accordance with the approved plan. c. A major modification to a previously approved PD General Development Plan will require compliance with the mixed-use provisions of this code. d. Parcels of land that were zoned PD prior to the effective date of this Code and for which a General Development Plan has not been approved will retain the PD district zoning designation. Such PD zoned property may not be developed until a General Development Plan for such PD zoned property has been submitted in compliance with §3.6.1.4 and approved pursuant to §5.7. Alternatively, such PD zoned property may be rezoned to a different zoning district in accordance with the provisions of §5.3 and developed pursuant to the applicable procedures and approvals for that district. e. The General Development Plan and administrative review requirements of this section are required after a map amendment is approved. Such requirements and all additional requirements of this section shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building or development permit. A properly approved detailed site plan or subdivision (preliminary and final) or both shall be required prior to a request for a building or development permit. The requirements are specified in Article 18, Approval Procedures. Planned Development District Design Standards Design Generally a. PD District zoning is intended to permit flexibility in the design, construction, and processing of mixed use developments of a quality that could not be achieved by complying with the design and development standards of another zoning district. Therefore, the design elements as set forth in Table 3-6 shall be adhered to in the design of a Planned Development and shall be used in the city’s review of proposed PD District ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 6 of 198 Project Staff Report PD24-001 Kellogg Tract Planned Development Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 7 of 10 projects b. Overall site design shall be harmonious in terms of landscaping, enclosure of principal and accessory uses, sizes of structures, street patterns, and use relationships. A variety in building types, heights, facades, setbacks, and size of open spaces shall be encouraged. Lot Standards and Buildable Area a. A PD District is not subject to any prescribed dimensional or density provisions but shall conform to the following, unless a different standard approved b. Maximum height is forty-five (45) feet, except where otherwise permitted by the Comprehensive Plan. c. Maximum gross density is twenty-four (24) residential units per gross acre. The maximum gross density proposed by the developer is 16 dwelling units per acre, with an average density of 6 dwelling units per acre in the mixed residential portions of the Planned Development. d. The maximum floor area ratio for non-residential uses is 2.4. A minimum of ten percent and a maximum of 70 percent of the total project floor area shall be reserved for non-residential uses. For purposes of this Chapter, semi-detached and two-family dwelling units are presumed to have 2000 square feet of floor area unless the specific dimensions are known at the time that the PD District rezoning is approved. e. The maximum Impervious Surface Ratio is sixty percent (60%) of the total site area. The maximum impervious surface ratio for Pod A & B is 35%, 50% for Pod C, and 6% for Pod D as outlined in the GDP Narrative. Open Space, Parks, and Recreation Area a. Minimum of 25 percent of the total site area. Portions of street rights-of-way that include street trees, sidewalks, and landscaped areas may be counted toward meeting open space requirements The Kellogg Planned Development includes 29 acres of reserved greenspace. At full build- out, the property is expected to have 117 acres designated as Open Space. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 7 of 198 Project Staff Report PD24-001 Kellogg Tract Planned Development Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 8 of 10 Architectural Elements a. Building height, rhythm, articulation, massing, and bulk shall be compatible with the individual site attributes and with the surrounding neighborhoods. b. Distinctive architectural details such as covered front entryways, covered front porches, door and window details, roof overhangs, and/or parapet walls with cap features shall be provided on each dwelling or principal structure. c. Garage fronts shall be deemphasized and shall not be the most prominent architectural feature of a house. This can be accomplished by providing side access garages, detached garages, and/or L- shaped floor plans. Front access garages shall be recessed from the front elevation of the structure at least 10 feet in order to provide interest and relief from the street. The garage area may not exceed 40% of the front facade of the structure. The front elevation shall include a porch or similar entrance designed for people rather than automobiles. The developer has limited front-facing garages to 16 ft on townhome garages and plans to use an alley system in some areas to reduce garage fronts. Recreational Elements a. At least 20% of the residential units shall be located within 1,000 feet of open space, park, or Greeneway. b. Recreation and open space facilities shall be aligned with the community parks and open space network, as provided in any adopted land use plans or parks and recreation master plans. c. When provided, neighborhood scale recreation facilities and amenities should be functional. If detention or retention areas are used for recreational amenities, they shall be designed to have the appearance of natural ponds or hillsides rather than stormwater management facilities. Such areas shall include natural vegetation, turf, or landscaping within all areas not permanently covered with standing water. At least 2 additional elements The developer has chosen to implement items a. and c. from the elements listed below. a. Bicycle lanes should be included along at least 70 percent of the linear frontage of all planned collector or arterial streets within or adjacent to the development. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 8 of 198 Project Staff Report PD24-001 Kellogg Tract Planned Development Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 9 of 10 The developer is including an 8 ft wide multi-use path on collector and sub-collector roads. b. Bicycle parking facilities should be provided for all uses except single-family detached and duplex residences. c. A customized entrance may be provided at the entry street intersecting an arterial or collector street that features a waterfall, sculpture, monument signage, special landscaping, specialty pavement, enhanced fence wall details, boulevard median, or other similar treatment. Customized entrances will be provided at subdivision entrances as well as the I-520 Greeneway connection. Parking a. Parking, areas designated for parking shall be physically separated from public streets and shall be designed in a manner conducive to safe ingress and egress. Access points to internal public streets or internal circulation drives should be no more than three hundred (300) feet apart. Landscaping b. Buffer yards or landscaping may be required by the Planning Commission between uses within any PD District or along the perimeter of a PD District. Buffers are required between single-family detached houses and any other surrounding use. Urban Design c. Urban design standards applicable to all proposed structures are required and shall be submitted in conjunction with a planned development application. The design elements specified in this section shall be incorporated into the required urban design standard. Based on these findings, Staff recommends approval of the PD general development plan as proposed. These changes will be presented as a draft ordinance for City Council to adopt if recommended by the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 9 of 198 Project Staff Report PD24-001 Kellogg Tract Planned Development Prepared by: Kuleigh Baker Meeting Date: December 18, 2024 Page 10 of 10 SECTION 7: ATTACHMENTS 1. Maps (Exhibit A) 2. Application Materials (Exhibit B) 3. Public Hearing Notice (Exhibit C) 4. Proposed PD Ordinance (Exhibit D) 5. General Development Plan (Exhibit E) 6. Master Utility Plan (Exhibit F) 7. ALTA Survey (Exhibit G) 8. Project Narrative (Exhibit H) 9. Traffic Improvement Analysis* (Exhibit I) *tabular data available upon request) cc Burt Fine, Cranston Engineering Group, via email Jared Poe, D. R. Horton, via email Mike Doherty, Walton South Carolina, LLC, via email ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 10 of 198 BELVEDE R ECL E ARWAT E R JOHNS O N ED G EFIE L D CLEARMO N T COMMERCIAL LANTANA GREENLA N D CIRCLE VIEW HOLLEY HILL DUNDEE SANDERS WI L D W O O D MO N T E R E Y VE R DER Y BE L A I R SP R I N G VIGILAN C E R I D GE F IELD PALM E T TOP K WY PA L M E T T O HASKELL L E HIGH GERBE R DAIS Y BUC H A N A N HERITAGE GL E N M O R E SHASTA DAISY AUDUB O N HA M P T O N NO R T H VIE W DORR JA C OB COLO NIAL RHOMB O I D LOP E R ED I S T O LANDON BORDE A U X SYCAMORE ELDER HAW T H O R N E HOR S ESHOE N E W C A S T L E AYR AS H L E Y Aiken County, SC, Maxar ± 04709401,4101,880235 Feet Path: H:\kbaker\ArcGIS\Planned Developments\PD24-001 Kellogg Tract\PD24-001 Kellogg Tract.aprx Aerial Map Application Number PD24-001 Tax Parcel Numbers 012-08-01-001, 011-19-01-001 and 011-14-04-045 7/25/2024 8:24 AM Subject Parcels EXHIBIT AATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 11 of 198 EDGEFIELD ED G E F I E L D AUDUB O N FA I R V I E W CL EAR M ONT JOHNSON LANTANA GREENLA N D STERLING PINECRE S T WHATLE Y DUNDEE P A L M E T T O TERESA SANDER S SYCAMORE ST JAM E S ELDER LA R R Y DE E CELESTE DORR RITA E D N A P A L M E T T O WIL D W O O D M O N T E R E Y BE L A I R O L D SUDLO WLAKE SP R I N G LEH I G H VIGILA N C E BE L A I R PI N E V I E W PA L M E T T O R I D G E FIELD HAMPTON CHER OKE E KERR BLANCHARD BUC H A N A N BUC H A N A N PA LME TTOPKWY EDISTO US 2 5 C O N N E C T O R US25CO NNECTOR BELVE D ERE CLEA R WATER PA L M E TTO P K W Y B E L V E DERE C L E A R W A T E R HASKELL CIRCLEVIEW CHE R R Y WI L D E GERBE R DAIS Y WIN D Y MILL WI N D Y MILL HERITAGE M I L L T H A X MORRIS MILL WOO D E N PO W E R HO U SE GL E N M O R E S O U T H E R N P I N E S RIT A SHASTA DAISYROS E M A R Y WHI T EHALL H AMPT O N S W ATH M O R E DO R R WARE BO R D E R PIEDM O N T BRIARC L I F F SHEFFI E L D N E W C A S T L E BORDE A U X COLO NIAL NORTH PINES ELIZABE T H RHOMB O I D LO P E R SA N JO S E LANDON CHARI O T M E X ICO R I C H L A N D ALEXA N D E R SERPE N T I N E ADAM S AS H L E Y JESS E DEE SA N D HIL L SPRING GARDE N HAZE L KARNES L A M B ACK AYR OA K D A L E FRANC E S VIC T O R I A NATHA N IE RIVER S C O N C O R D PALMETTO PK W Y FO U N T AI NHE A D PA L M E T T O P K W Y JANUARY PALM ETT O PKW Y 07001,4002,1002,800350 Feet Map Key Zoning ZONING Outside of City Zoning R-14 - Large, Lot Single-Family Residential R-10 - Medium, LotSingle-FamilyResidential R-7 - Small Lot, Single- Family Residential R-5 - Mixed Residential GC - General Commercial PD - PlannedDevelopment CR - Critical Reserve P - Public Kellogg Tract Kellogg Tract 7/25/2024 Path: H:\kbaker\ArcGIS\Planned Developments\PD24-001 Kellogg Tract\PD24-001 Kellogg Tract.aprx Zoning Map Application Number PD24-001 Tax Parcel Numbers 012-08-01-001 Zoned CR, Critical Areas 011-19-01-001 Zoned Aiken Co. RD/UD 011-14-04-045 Zoned Aiken Co. UD ± Subject Parcels ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 12 of 198 42 0 270 490 280 330 3 6 0 480 45 0 47 0 250 456 26 0 48 4 240 310 250 49 0 4 9 0 482 26 0 300 470 29 0 28 0 320 500 350 47 2 5 0 0 26 0 500 47 2 420 48 0 40 0 340 2 7 0 470 430 4 4 0 27 0 420 430 47 0 2 9 0 30 0 2 8 0 490 490 4 1 0 430 45 0 450 4 6 0 490 460 44 0 4 0 0 3 2 0 470 440 470 470 4 3 0 450 330 380 440 460 410 440 410 45 0 460 4 8 0 43 0 450 460 480 400 4 2 0 3 7 0 3 1 0 3 9 0 34 0 3 5 0 480 5 0 0 460 37 0 360 380 3 9 0 C A R M E L BE L V E D E R E CL E A R W A T E R CLEARM O N T LANTANA GREENLA N D CIRCLEVIEW PINECRES T WHATLE Y HOLLEY HILL DUNDEE TERESA SANDERS SYCAMORE ELDER CELESTE E D NA P A L M E T T O P K W Y MO N T E R E Y VE R D E R Y BE L A I R LEHIG H BE L A I R PALM ETTO R I D G E F I E L D PALMETTO PKWY VIGILAN C E PALMETTOPKWY SPARTA N PA L M E T T O P K W Y PA L M E T T O P A L M E T T O US 25 CONNECTOR HASKELL E D I S T O CIRCLE VIEW BELVEDERE CLEARWATER GERBER DAISY HERITAGE S A N D M MORRIS MILL GLE N M O R E SHASTA DAISY ED G E F I E L D JANUARY HA M P T O N N E W C A S T L E KERR RITA AUDU B O N WARE DORR JOHNSON COLO N I A L EDGEFIELD SP R I N G DOR R WILDWOOD L O P E R LANDON SPRING GARDE N BUCHANAN NAPPIER ALEXA N D E R ADAM S PI N E V I E W KARNE S JOHNS O N STERLING BO R D E R H A W T H O R N E HA Z E L HOR S E S H O E AYR VIC T O R I A STJAMES AS H L E Y R IVERS OA K D A L E FA I R V I E W Topography Map Application Number PD24-001 Tax Parcel Numbers 012-08-01-001, 011-19-01-001, and 011-14-04-045 ± 04308601,2901,720215 Feet 7/25/2024 8:24 AM Path: H:\kbaker\ArcGIS\Planned Developments\PD24-001 Kellogg Tract\PD24-001 Kellogg Tract.aprx Map Key Topo10ft Kellogg Tract Roads Subject Parcels ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 13 of 198 04/15/2024 Jared Poe Application for Development Approval Please type or print all information Staff Use North August South Carolina's Riuerfront Application Number _____ _ Date Received --------- Review Fee Date Paid 1.Project Name _K_e _ll_og_g_T_ra_c_t _______________________ _ Project Address/Location East of Edgefield Road and North of Belvedere Clearwater Road Total Project Acreage _+_/-_4_6_7 _______ _ Current Zoning CR/AIKEN COUNTY Tax Parcel Number(s) 011-19-01 -001; 012-08-01-001; 011-14-04-045 2.Applicant/Owner Name DR Horton, INC Mailing Address 4234 Wheeler Road Applicant Phone 407-991-0177 City Martinez ST GA Zip 30907 Email jmpoe@ drhorton.com 3.Is there a Designated Agent for this project? X Yes ___ No If Yes, attach a notarized Designation of Agent form. (required if Applicant is not property owner) 4.Engineer/Architect/Surveyor _B_u_r _to_n _F_in _e ______ _ License No. 42526-------- Firm Name Cranston LLC Firm Phone 706-722-1588 Firm Mailing Address 452 Ellis St. City Augu sta ST GA Zip 30901 Email bfine@cranstonengineering.com Signature �r� •:Date _0 __ 4/_1_5/_20_2_4 ______ _ 5.Is there any recorded restricted covenant or other private agreement that is contrary to, conflicts with or prohibits the use or activity on the property that is the subject of the application?(Check one.) ___ yes X no 6.In accordance with Section 5.1.2.3 of the North Augusta Development Code, I hereby request the Cityof North Augusta review the attached project plans. The documents required by the City of NorthAugusta, as outlined in Appendix B of the North Augusta Development Code, are attached for the City'sreview for completeness. The applicant acknowledges that all required documents must be correct andcomplete to initiate the compliance review process . .,,--< � � 7. or Designated Agent Signature Date Print Applicant or Agent Name 1/2013 EXHIBIT BATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 14 of 198 Designation of Agent Please type or print all information Sotith Carolincls Riuedront This form is required if the property owner is not the applicant. Application Number Staff Use Only Date Received 1. Project Name Kellogg Trac' Project Address/Location 607 Edgef!eld ROad Project Parcel Number(s) 011-19-01-001 and 012-08-01-001 2. Property @Wner Name Walton South Carolina, LLC OwnerPhone 813-951-0003 Mailing Address ssoo N Gainey Center Dr., Suite 345 City Scottsdale ST 42 2jp 85258 Email MikeDoherty@walton.com 3. Designated Agent Jared POe Relationship to Owner BuYer/Pur(tlaser Firm Name D.R. Horton, Inc.Phone 470-991-0177 Agent's Mailing Address 4234 Wheeler Road City Martinez 53 7 GA Zip 30907 E mail JMPoe@drhorton.com Agent's Signature Date 01/15/24 4. I hereby designate the above-named person (Line 3) to serve as my agent and represent me in the referenced application. SEE ATT ACHED SIGNATURE PAGE Owner Signature 01/16/2024 Date 5. Sworn and subscribed to before me on this day of , 20 SEE ATT ACHED SIGNATURE PAGE Notary Public Commission Expiration Date 1/2013 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 15 of 198 4. I hereby designate the above-named person (Line 3) to serve as my agent and represent me in the referenced application. Owner: Walton South Carolina, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company, in its capacity as agent for and on behalf of the Owners By: Walton International Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation Name: Todd Woodhead Title: Vice President Date: 01/16/2024 5. Sworn and subscribed to before me on this 16th day of January Cx!J Notary Public 08/05/2026 Commission Expiration Date MARICOPA COLINn" I Commission#63544'l I , 20 i ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 16 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 17 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 18 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 19 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 20 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 21 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 22 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 23 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 24 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 25 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 26 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 27 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 28 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 29 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 30 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 31 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 32 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 33 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 34 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 35 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 36 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 37 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 38 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 39 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 40 of 198 4/15/24, 3:55 PM qPublic.net - Aiken County, SC - Report: 011-19-01-001 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=844&LayerID=15264&PageTypeID=4&PageID=6879&KeyValue=011-19-01-001 1/6 SUN YUPING KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE IP WAI LING KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE CHOI MAN HAR KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE ABAS NASHILA BINTE KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE PU SU CHING KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DRScottsdale, AZ 85258 THE TAN POH KHENG KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DRScottsdale, AZ 85258 THE IIYAMA TSUYOSHI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DRScottsdale, AZ 85258 THE CAO LI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DRScottsdale, AZ 85258 THE INADA TOYOSHI KELLOGG TRACT ROVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DRScottsdale, AZ 85258 THE TACHINO YORIKO KELLOGG TRACTREVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE ZHU JIANGTIAN KELLOGG TRACTREVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE WANG CHUN-CHEN KELLOGGTRACT REVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE HO OI MAN KELLOGG TRACTREVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE SUN ZHANGZHAN KELLOGG TRACTREVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE MATAR RAMI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE ORTH RIVEROLL PAUL HENRI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE ARAND STEFAN KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 WLF 3 LLC 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE CHOI MAN HAR KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE HILL IAN THOMAS KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE ITO YUMIKO KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE ALALAWI SAWSAN ABBAS HASHEM ALAWI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DRScottsdale, AZ 85258 THE ITO YUKI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE IIKUBO YUKIHIKO KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE CHEN MEE CHING KELLOGG TRACTREVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE NAKAYAMA NOBORU KELLOGGTRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE CANN MICHAEL NEIL KELLOGGTRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE ISHII YOHEI KELLOGG TRACTREVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE YUNIS RASHAD KELLOGG TRACTREVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE TORII REIKO KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE GOOSEN LEON KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE HUNT DWAYNE THURSTON ST CLAIR KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE TAN KAH LUANG KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE WATSON ELAINE PATRICIA KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 Parcel Summary Parcel ID 011-19-01-001 Location Address 607 EDGEFIELD RDNORTH AUGUSTA 29841 Legal Description E OF HWY 25 N OF RD 126(Note: Not to be used on legal documents) Property Type NON-OWNER OCCUPIED RESIDENTIAL Neighborhood NORTH AUGUSTADistricts05_C - COUNCIL DISTRICT FIVE Millage Rate 6% RATIO = 238.24 (NON-OWNER OCCUPIED)4% RATIO = 104.04 (OWNER OCCUPIED) Exemptions Owner Information Aiken County, SC Skip to main content ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 41 of 198 4/15/24, 3:55 PM qPublic.net - Aiken County, SC - Report: 011-19-01-001 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=844&LayerID=15264&PageTypeID=4&PageID=6879&KeyValue=011-19-01-001 2/6 THE MATSUDA KONOMI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE TAN SENG HU KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE FUKUMOTO YOSHIHIRO KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE MCNAUGHTAN DEREK KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE CHEN TEAK HAUT KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE MATSUDA ATSUSHI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DRScottsdale, AZ 85258 THE CONSERVO INTERNATIONAL RETIREMENT PLANDATED NOVEMBER 15 2013 (THE TRUST)8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE KOH CHAR BOH KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DRScottsdale, AZ 85258 THE FONG YEW MENG KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST8800 N Gainey Center DRScottsdale, AZ 85258 WALTON LAND ACQUISITIONS LLC 8800 N Gainey Center DRScottsdale, AZ 85258 THE ABRAHAMS CLIVE KELLOGG TRACTREVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE INOUE TOMOYUKI KELLOGG TRACTREVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE VACKIER HARALD JOZEF LUCIEKELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE LAM LOUIS HUNG TAK KELLOGGTRACT REVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 THE TAN POH KHENG KELLOGG TRACTREVOCABLE TRUST 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 WALTON LAND ACQUISITIONS 2 LLC 8800 N Gainey Center DR Scottsdale, AZ 85258 Land Use Units Unit Type AgUse Value Market Land Value NON-OWNER OCCUPIED RESIDENTIAL (NRN)1.00 ACRES $0 $5,000 NON-OWNER OCCUPIED RESIDENTIAL (NRN)379.62 T4 $49,351 $49,350 Description Size Units Market Value HORSE STABLE 0 x 0 0 $1,500.00 IMPLEMENT SHED 0 x 0 0 $890.00 Sale Date Buyer Seller Sale Price Book/Page 10/26/2023 THE ITO YUMIKO KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $3,510,000 5145-1505 10/26/2023 THE WANG CHUN-CHEN KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $200,000 5146-900 10/19/2023 THE ITO YUMIKO KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $1,250,000 5145-1494 10/19/2023 THE ABRAHAMS CLIVE KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $100,000 5144-2372 10/16/2023 WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $1,500,000 5128-1099 10/16/2023 THE ABAS NASHILA BINTE KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $300,000 5145-1406 10/16/2023 THE TAN POH KHENG KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $250,000 5145-1450 10/16/2023 THE INOUE TOMOYUKI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $50,000 5145-798 Land Information Buildings Type Single Family Residence Stories 1 Story Total Area Sq Ft 1666Exterior Walls Frame Siding VinylActualYearBuilt1969 Flooring Automatic Floor Cover Allowance Roof Cover Metal, Performed Number Fireplaces 1Heating Type Warmed and Cooled AirBedrooms0 Bathrooms 2 Garage Area 0 BasementMarket Value $83397 Miscellaneous Improvement Information Sales ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 42 of 198 4/15/24, 3:55 PM qPublic.net - Aiken County, SC - Report: 011-19-01-001 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=844&LayerID=15264&PageTypeID=4&PageID=6879&KeyValue=011-19-01-001 3/6 Sale Date Buyer Seller Sale Price Book/Page 10/16/2023 THE ALALAWI SAWSAN ABBAS HASHEM ALAWI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $250,000 5145-1395 9/25/2023 THE ZHU JIANGTIAN KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $100,000 5145-1483 9/19/2023 THE ABRAHAMS CLIVE KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $10,000 5145-234 9/19/2023 THE IP WAI LING KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $50,000 5145-1472 9/19/2023 THE CANN MICHAEL NEIL KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5145-776 9/19/2023 THE CANN MICHAEL NEIL KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5145-223 9/19/2023 THE IP WAI LING KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $30,000 5145-1552 9/19/2023 THE ZHU JIANGTIAN KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $60,000 5145-163 9/19/2023 WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $40,000 5145-1461 9/19/2023 THE ITO YUKI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $50,000 5145-809 9/19/2023 THE CHEN TEAK HAUT KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $60,000 5145-787 9/19/2023 THE FUKUMOTO YOSHIHIRO KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $40,000 5145-321 9/19/2023 THE ZHU JIANGTIAN KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $50,000 5144-1896 9/19/2023 THE HILL IAN THOMAS KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $30,000 5145-1417 9/19/2023 THE ZHU JIANGTIAN KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5144-1741 9/19/2023 THE INADA TOYOSHI KELLOGG TRACT ROVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $30,000 5145-174 9/19/2023 THE LAM LOUIS HUNG TAK KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $30,000 5145-512 9/19/2023 THE ALALAWI SAWSAN ABBAS HASHEM ALAWI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5144-2317 9/19/2023 THE GOOSEN LEON KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5145-26 9/19/2023 THE HUNT DWAYNE THURSTON ST CLAIR KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $40,000 5145-1439 9/19/2023 THE CHOI MAN HAR KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $50,000 5144-2294 9/19/2023 WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $50,000 5145-185 9/19/2023 THE ARAND STEFAN KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5145-37 9/19/2023 THE HUNT DWAYNE THURSTON ST CLAIR KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5145-212 9/19/2023 THE PU SU CHING KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $50,000 5145-1541 9/19/2023 THE ABAS NASHILA BINTE KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5144-2244 9/19/2023 THE FONG YEW MENG KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5145-12 9/19/2023 THE CAO LI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $120,000 5145-1564 9/19/2023 THE ABRAHAMS CLIVE KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $30,000 5144-2283 9/19/2023 THE ABRAHAMS CLIVE KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $100,000 5144-2118 9/19/2023 WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5144-2193 9/19/2023 THE ALALAWI SAWSAN ABBAS HASHEM ALAWI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $30,000 5144-2182 9/19/2023 THE INADA TOYOSHI KELLOGG TRACT ROVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $50,000 5145-152 9/19/2023 THE CHEN TEAK HAUT KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5144-2418 9/19/2023 THE ISHII YOHEI KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $30,000 5145-1428 9/19/2023 SUN YUPING KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $50,000 5144-1789 9/19/2023 THE ABAS NASHILA BINTE KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $50,000 5144-2107 9/19/2023 THE ABRAHAMS CLIVE KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $100,000 5144-2204 9/19/2023 WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $1,000,000 5144-1716 9/19/2023 SUN YUPING KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5145-1 9/19/2023 WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5144-2129 9/19/2023 THE ZHU JIANGTIAN KELLOGG TRACT REVOCABLE TRUST WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT $20,000 5144-2306 9/1/2023 WALTON SOUTH CAROLINA LLC ; ATTENTION LEGAL DEPT JOHN CARROLL JR L $4,473,265 5111-1807 Valuation Disclaimer The data may not re 4/15/24, 3:55 PM qPublic.net - Aiken County, SC - Report: 011-19-01-001 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=844&LayerID=15264&PageTypeID=4&PageID=6879&KeyValue=011-19-01-001 4/6 Year 2023 2022 2021 2020 Market Land Value $54,350 $1,903,100 $1,903,100 $1,903,100 + Market Improvement Value $83,400 $85,790 $85,790 $85,790 + Market Misc Value $2,390 $0 $0 $0 = Total Market/Exemption Value $140,140 $1,988,890 $1,988,890 $1,988,890 Assessed Land Value $2,039 $2,080 $2,080 $900 + Assessed Improvement Value = Total Assessed Value $3,150 $5,110 $5,110 $3,550 Property Valuation History Sketches ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 44 of 198 4/15/24, 3:55 PM qPublic.net - Aiken County, SC - Report: 011-19-01-001 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=844&LayerID=15264&PageTypeID=4&PageID=6879&KeyValue=011-19-01-001 5/6 Photos ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 45 of 198 4/15/24, 3:55 PM qPublic.net - Aiken County, SC - Report: 011-19-01-001 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=844&LayerID=15264&PageTypeID=4&PageID=6879&KeyValue=011-19-01-001 6/6 No data available for the following modules: Mobile Home Information, Mobile Homes on Parcel. The Aiken County Assessor’s Of ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 47 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 48 of 198 City of North Augusta, South Carolina Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice The North Augusta Planning Commission will hold its regular monthly meeting at 6:00 PM on Wednesday, December 18, 2024, in the Council Chambers located on the 3rd floor of the North Augusta Municipal Center, 100 Georgia Avenue, to receive public input on the following applications: RZM24-002 – A request by DR Horton, Inc. to rezone ±86.22 acres located along Belvedere Clearwater Road and Vigilance Way, TPN 012-08-01-001, from CR, Critical Areas to PD, Planned Development. PD24-001 – A request by DR Horton, Inc. for approval of a Planned Development General Development Plan affecting ±467 acres roughly bound by I-520, Belvedere Clearwater Road, and Edgefield Road. The property includes TPN 012-08-01-001 currently zoned CR, Critical Areas and proposed to be rezoned PD, Planned Development. The property also includes TPNs 011-19-01-001 and 011-11-14-045 to be annexed into the City of North Augusta and zoned PD, Planned Development. The proposed project is a mixed-use development consisting of a mix of residential and commercial uses. Documents related to the application will be available for public inspection after December 11, 2024 in the office of the Department of Planning and Development on the 2nd floor of the Municipal Center, 100 Georgia Avenue, North Augusta, South Carolina and online at www.northaugustasc.gov. All members of the public interested in expressing a view on these cases are encouraged to attend or provide written comments to planning@northaugustasc.gov by Noon on December 18th. CITIZEN ASSISTANCE: Individuals needing special assistance or a sign interpreter to participate in the meeting are asked to please notify the Department of Planning and Development at 803-441-4221 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. EXHIBIT CATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 49 of 198 ORDINANCE NO. 2024-XX TO APPROVE THE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE 467± ACRE KELLOGG PLANNED DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF US 25 AND NORTH OF SC 126 WHEREAS, within the guidelines of the North Augusta Zoning and Development Standards Ordinance, a General Development Plan for property within a designated Planned Development zone (PD) requires Planning Commission review and subsequent recommendation to City Council for review and approval; and WHEREAS, an application has been received from DR Horton, INC requesting approval for a General Development Plan for a tract of land zoned Critical Area (CR) containing 86± acres located immediately north of SC 126, east of US 25 and bisected by I-520; and WHEREAS, an application has been received from DR Horton, INC requesting approval for a General Development Plan and annexation of a tract of land in unincorporated Aiken County containing 381± acres located immediately north of SC 126, east of US 25 and bisected by I-520; and WHEREAS, the developer, DR Horton, INC, of Deleware proposes a mixed use development on three tracts containing a combined acreage of 467± acres. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, IN MEETING DULY ASSEMBLED AND BY THE AUTHORITY THEREOF, THAT: I.The General Development Plan for the 467± acre Kellogg Planned Development is hereby approved as outlined below and as shown on the attached plat and identified as ‘Exhibit A’ as prepared by Cranston LLC, dated April 15, 2024. The General Development Plan Narrative for Kellogg Tract as prepared by Cranston LLC, dated November 19, 2024 attached hereto as ‘Exhibit B’, represents the intent of DR Horton, INC, and addresses the requirements of the Zoning and Development Standards Ordinance for a Planned Development. A.Scope of Development: The scope of development described in the General Development Plan for the Kellogg Planned Development and described herein shall be the maximum level of development allowed. The land uses permitted in the Kellogg Planned Development shall be limited to those described in this ordinance. 1.Minor Modifications: Minor modifications to the development plan and program for valid land use planning reasons, i.e. mix of uses, number and location of buildings, development schedule, setbacks, parking, and EXHIBIT DATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 50 of 198 ORDINANCE TO APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Page 2 KELLOGG TRACT landscaping, etc., may be approved by the Planning Commission at the time of preliminary plat approval for a tract, subdivision approval for any portion of a tract or site plan approval for an individual parcel. 2. Flex Units: Up to five (5%) percent of the total residential density allocated to a tract may be deducted from the total permitted for that tract and redistributed to one or more other tracts provided the total density of a flex unit recipient tract is not increased by more than ten (10%) percent. Tracts B, Mixed Residential, and C, General Commercial, may be the recipients of flex units. B. Development Program: Plan Desig natio n Description Area in Acres Maximum Density / Intensity Average Density Maximum Units A Single-Family Residential 276 8 dua 3.6 dua 993 units* B Mixed Residential 135 16 dua 6 dua 810 units* C General Commercial 27 21,780 sf per acre (50%) N/A N/A D Greenspace 29 N/A N/A N/A * The maximum density across the 411 acres allocated to Pods A and B shall not exceed 4.3 dua. This allows for 1763 units max for the development. Development Program Definitions: Dua – dwelling units per acre Maximum density – The maximum number of units that may be constructed per acre on a parcel or in a single subdivision excluding open space. Average Density – The total number of units that may be constructed per gross acre. Total Density – The total number of units that may be constructed on a tract. Intensity – The total number of gross square feet of non-residential building that may be constructed per acre. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 51 of 198 ORDINANCE TO APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Page 3 KELLOGG TRACT C. Permitted Uses: Plan Designation Description Uses A Single-Family Residential Permitted – Single-family residential including detached residential homes (large, medium and small lot); and accessory uses to any permitted use. and accessory uses to any permitted use. B Mixed Residential Permitted – Multi-family residential, duplexes, townhouses, apartments (under 300 units), condominiums, single-family detached homes, patio homes, build-to-rent housing, daycare, education professional, medical and finance office; general business as permitted in General Commercial District of the NADC (Commercial use shall not exceed 30,000 SF of building coverage). Accessory uses to any permitted use. C Commercial Permitted – Professional, medical and financial office; Educational Institutions (primary through graduate, public and private); Churches, places of worship, religious institutions; Primary and secondary and convenience retail; child day care facility; laundry; Drive-through retail; multi- family residential flex units above the first floor if allocated; gasoline service stations; Accessory uses to any permitted use and any use permitted in the General Commercial District of the NADC. Prohibited – Heavy manufacturing; hazardous material storage; salvage operations; adult entertainment; outdoor sales and service of any construction material or heavy equipment. For all uses noise, odor, vibration, glare, vapor, fumes, dust, etc. shall meet or exceed the performance standards prescribed in Section 3.g.4 of the Zoning and Development Standards Ordinance. D Green Space Permitted – To be reserved as undeveloped open space, low impact amenities or utility infrastructure. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 52 of 198 ORDINANCE TO APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Page 4 KELLOGG TRACT D. Development Standards: Applicable to individual parcel site plans. Minimum Setbacks Use Front (Feet) Rear (Feet) Side (Feet) Height (Feet) (Max.) Impervious Area (Max.) Open Space* (Min.) General Commercial 25 20 10 45 70% 20% Commercial Recreation 50 25 25 35 40% 60% Residential - Single Family Large Lot 5/20 20 8 35 35% N/A - Single Family Small Lot 5/20*** 15 5 35 40% 10% - Single Family Small Lot/Cottages 5/20*** 15 5 35 50% 10% - Duplexes 20 15 0/8 35 50% 10% - Townhouses** 20 15 0/8 35 70% 20% - Condominiums 25 20 0/20 45 70% 20% - Apartments 25 35 30 45 70% 20% * The minimum open space required in this table relates to the individual development within each pod. At full build out, the property will have a minimum 25% of the total property acreage dedicated to open space. ** Townhouses to have a minimum width of 24’ *** For patio homes, single family homes, townhomes or cottages that have frontage on both subdivision streets and alleys, one front setback may be 5’ to work with grades as needed. One font setback must be 20’ to allow for driveway parking. Single-Family Detached Definitions: · Single-Family Large Lot: Defined as detached lots greater than or equal to 70’ in width to accommodate a product size greater than 54’ in width · Single-Family Medium Lot: Defined as detached lots greater than or equal to 50’ in width to accommodate a product type between 40’ and 53’ in width · Single-Family Small Lot: Defined as lots greater than or equal to 40’ in width to accommodate a product type between 30’ and 39’ in width · Cottage: Defined at detached lots greater than or equal to 30’ in width to accommodate a product type less than 30’ in width. E. Plan Approval Process: subsequent to the adoption of this ordinance the following plan approval steps shall be required in the order listed prior to the issuance of any building permits. 1. Master Utility Plan – Master plans for water distribution, sewage collection and stormwater drainage and detention shall be developed in conjunction with the City Utilities Department and City Engineer and approved prior to or coincidental with the initial tract concept plan. The level of detail ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 53 of 198 ORDINANCE TO APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Page 5 KELLOGG TRACT provided in the master utility plans shall be determined by the Project Engineer, City Engineer and Utilities Director. 2. Wetlands Delineation and Mitigation – A wetlands delineation, permit and any mitigation plans approved by SCDHEC and the US Army Corps of Engineers shall be submitted prior to or coincidental with a Concept Plan for any Tract that contains jurisdictional wetlands. 3. Tract Concept Plan – A concept plan for each tract identified in the General Development Plan shall be prepared for Planning Commission review and approval prior to or coincidental with the first preliminary plat application for each tract. The tract concept plan shall include an overall circulation system design, utility systems designs, anticipated mix and intensity/density of uses, proposed or draft master covenants and restrictions for the tract, and buffer delineation. The tract concept plan must indicate how the development of the tract will interrelate with the other tracts in the Kellogg Tract development. 4. Preliminary Plat – Preliminary plats for sections or phases of each tract will be processed and reviewed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of submittal, this ordinance and the General Development Plan Narrative for Kellogg Tract 5. Final Plat – Final plats for sections or phases of each tract will be processed and reviewed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of submittal and the approved preliminary plat. 6. Site Plan – Site Plans for individual parcels approved in a final plat for any portion of a tract will be processed and reviewed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of submittal, this ordinance and the General Development Plan Narrative for Kellogg Tract. F. Land Dedication: Land dedicated to the City in conjunction with the development will include road rights-of-way, utility lift stations and utility easements with the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect and the time of dedication. The City will also consider accepting the designated open space and/or greenspace that the applicant is willing to dedicate in addition to the required dedications. G. Vehicular Access and Circulation: Primary access to the Kellogg Development west of I-520 shall be from US 25 and SC 126 by way of a collector roads. Access to the tract east of I-520 is available from SC 126 although other alternatives may be available with the development of the Highland Springs tract at a later date. Interconnectivity between the various tracts of the development and neighboring tracts and subdivisions shall be provided ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 54 of 198 ORDINANCE TO APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Page 6 KELLOGG TRACT wherever feasible and practicable. Truck traffic from the commercial tracts through the residential tracts or through adjacent residential areas will be discouraged through roadway, access and circulation system design. 1. Collector Roads - The primary access roads within the project will be the collector roads shown on the General Development Plan. These roads will provide direct access through the development from US 25 to SC 126. A 90-foot right-of-way width will be provided with sidewalk on one side and multi-use path on the other. The General Development Plan shows a typical cross section for this road which is expected to have a 12 feet median, 2 travel lanes with 13 feet of pavement, concrete curb and gutters and no on-street parking. Curb cuts will be limited along these roads and no residential lot frontage or residential driveway cuts will be permitted. 12-foot turn lanes will be provided at the required intersections. Block length requirements shall not apply to these roads as sufficient circulation has been proposed on the GDP. 2. Subcollector Roads - The General Development plan also proposes subcollector roads. These roads will have a 60’ R/W, 26’ of pavement width, concrete curb and gutter, and sidewalk on one side and multi- use path on the other. The purpose of these roads is to traverse the steeper terrain of the site, from the collector road, to provide access to the various residential pods. These will not be lot fronting roads and are intended to be utilized primarily by residents of the community. 3. Local Roads: Access to the individual residential pods from the collector and major subdivision road will be provided by local roads. Local Roads will have a section based on a 50-foot right-of-way with 24 feet of pavement and concrete curb and gutters. This base section would not support on-street parking. Where it is determined that on- street parking is desired, the street section will be widened to accommodate. Cul-de-sac radii for the minor roads will be 40 feet to back of curb. Individual subdivision roads may be designed and constructed to narrower standards provided that such design is in accordance with City guidelines during the approval process. All other design requirements shall follow the CONA development code based on ADT. 4. Alley Streets: Ally streets will also be incorporated into Pods A and B to allow for rear or side access to cottages, patio homes, and townhomes. These roads will follow the design criteria of the North Augusta Development Code. H. Pedestrian Circulation: All roads in the development shall include pedestrian paths on each side except for alley streets. For the majority of the site this will be concrete sidewalks, however, a multi-use trail will be provided on one side ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 55 of 198 ORDINANCE TO APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Page 7 KELLOGG TRACT of the collector roads in lieu of the concrete sidewalk. This will provide interconnectivity between the various residential tracts, the General Commercial Tract, parks, commercial recreation uses and any other pedestrian trails in the vicinity. A connection to the I-520 multi use path will also be made. I. Buffers and Landscaping: Landscaped buffers, site landscaping and parking lot landscaping shall be provided in the development as described herein. Landscaping and buffer requirements and standards applicable to each use and tract of the development and not otherwise prescribed in the General Development Plan or this ordinance shall be as prescribed in the applicable Development Code in effect at the time of plan submittal. All buffers shall be landscaped with existing natural vegetation or new plant material or both to create a visual screen. Title to the required buffers shall be retained by a property owners’ association or deed-restricted to prevent a change of use. Minimum buffer requirements between tracts and uses are: 1. Commercial / Residential – A 40’wide type D buffer shall be provided on all commercial tracts as separation from all residential tracts and uses, both internal and external to Kellogg Tract. If tracts are separated by collector road, section I.3 shall govern. 2. Residential / Residential – A 40’ wide buffer planted to type C buffer planting requirements per NADC shall be provided as separation between residential tracts and any other proposed use internal and external to the development. This buffer shall also be provided between single-family detached and any other proposed use and where owner occupied housing meets rental housing. 3. Collector Road – The primary collector roadway in the development shall be bordered by a 40’ wide buffer planted to type D buffer requirements within the Mixed-Residential tracts. In all other tracts the landscaped setback/buffer from the collector road shall be not less than twenty-five (25) feet. Buffers for all roads abutting lots for development shall make use of buffer on property line per NADC 7.4.3.3 4. Major Subdivision Road – The primary roads from the collector through Pod A shall be bordered by a 30’ wide buffer planted to type C buffer requirements. Buffers for all roads abutting lots for development shall make use of buffer on property line per NADC 7.4.3.3 5. SC 126 – The landscaped setback/buffer from SC 126 shall meet the Type C buffer requirement per NADC. 6. Undisturbed natural buffers in equivalent in width to the above shall not require additional planting, if after site clearing they are deemed by North Augusta Planning Director to meet the intent of the buffer requirement. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 56 of 198 ORDINANCE TO APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Page 8 KELLOGG TRACT 7. Total street trees requirements will be calculated at the required spacing in the NADC by using centerline length of roadway and subtracting other unplantable area from the total. Street trees may be used interchangeably with lot landscaping trees on local and subcollector roads K. Parking Requirements: All uses shall provide on-site parking as required by the Development Code in effect when submitted for approval The Planning Commission may approve or require less than the minimum specified by the applicable code when an adequate shared parking supply is available and when desirable to minimize or reduce impervious surfaces. L. Applicable Standards for Review: The information contained in the General Development Plan and the General Development Plan Narrative for Kellogg Tract shall supplement the provisions of this ordinance and shall be used in the review of tract concept, subdivision and site plans for projects within Kellogg Tract. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this ordinance and the content of the General Development Plan or the General Development Plan Narrative for Kellogg Tract, the provisions of this ordinance shall prevail. General design criteria and development standards (parking, landscaping, etc.) applicable to each phase of the development and not otherwise prescribed in the General Development Plan, the General Development Plan Narrative or this ordinance shall be as prescribed in the Development Code in effect on the date of submittal. M. The Traffic Impact Analysis titled “Kellogg Tract Traffic Impact Study” for Cranston Engineering dated October, 2024 is included in this ordinance by reference. II. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed. III. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption on second reading. DONE, RATIFIED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, ON THIS ______ DAY OF __________________, 20_____ First Reading Briton S. Williams, Mayor ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 57 of 198 ORDINANCE TO APPROVE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Page 9 KELLOGG TRACT Second Reading ATTEST: Jamie Paul, City Clerk ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 58 of 198 EX H I B I T E ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 59 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 60 of 198 •--v-...--,,...,.-1.-J\,.,----- /� /\., -__. r-.... "-/ "'-"--- ,_..., -_.,/ / J'--'--... ......._ --/ _,,__ '------...........__ /::-� � ;/-- �1 ;,)/;;/ '\...,_ ) } <.. L \ TIE TO 8" WATER DEMAND CALCULA TTONS: PUMP STATION 1 · (1109 RESIDENTIAL LOTS)*(300 GPO/LOT) -332,700 GPO (25,000 SF RESTAURANT)/(2500 SF /RESTAURANT) -10 RESTAURANTS (10 RESTAURANTS) ' (50 SEATS/RESTAURANT) ' (30 GPO/SEAT) -15,000 GPO (15,000 SF DAYCARE) ' (1 PERSON/100 SF) ' (11 GPO/PERSON) -1650 GPO (30,000 SF GEN BUSINESS) + (25,000 SF RETAIL) -55,000 SF (55,000 SF) • (1 PERSON/100 SF) • 19 GPO/PERSON -10,450 GPO 4,000 SF GAS STATION -(5 EMPLOYEE) ' 8 GDP + (150 CARS) ' 8 GPO -1240 GPO PUMP STATION 1 TOTAL -361,040 GPO PVMP STATION 2· BELVEDERE-CLEARWATER ROAD EXISTING 24' WA TE"R LIN£ (CONAJ 1,040 GPD • V �t��__),,�SEESHEET02FO R AERIAL CR OSSIN ± 9,500 LF OF FORCE MAIN TO MIMMS BRANCH CONCEPT � � � '--. I � . '--------------- MASTER UTILITY PLAN F O R 01 OF 02 2023-0382 KELLOGG TRACT NORTH AUGUSTA, SC SCALE: 1" -300' JULY 1, 2024 300 150 0---30�0 -------"'600 SCA LE IN F E E T P R E P A R E D B Y CRANSTON M --ffC., • --_________ __. 7 ---BELVEDERE-CLEARWATER ROAD Tl£ TO PROPOSED FORC£MAIN \\/ LOOP WA iTR TO 24" MAIN IF N££0£D EXHIBIT F ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 61 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 62 of 198 V I C I N I T Y M A P no t t o s c a l e WA L T O N G L O B A L H O L D I N G S , L L C pr e p a r e d f o r AN A L T A / N S P S LA N D T I T L E S U R V E Y O F TR A C T S A , B , C , D & E OF "T H E K E L L O G G T R A C T " CO N T A I N I N G A T O T A L OF 4 7 0 . 8 7 A C R E S PA R T I A L L Y I N T H E C I T Y O F N O R T H A U G U S T A , AN D P A R T I A L L Y I N U N I N C O R P O R A T E D A I K E N C O U N T Y , NE A R B E L V E D E R E SO U T H C A R O L I N A 0 40 0 40 0 80 0 1 I N C H = 4 0 0 F E E T SH E E T O F 2 1 fi e l d JU L Y 2 0 2 2 pl a t 08 / 0 8 / 2 2 dr a w n CW W re v i e w e d FE Q cr e w GA jo b 3 0 0 6 9 . 0 0 0 0 Z:\30069\30069.0000\Survey\DWG\30069S02_ALTA.dwg - Aug 7, 2023 - 3:52:37 PM 68 2 J o h n n i e D o d d s B o u l e v a r d • S u i t e 1 0 0 Mt . P l e a s a n t , S C 2 9 4 6 4 • 8 4 3 . 8 4 9 . 0 2 0 0 ww w . t h o m a s a n d h u t t o n . c o m SI T E 52 0 20 45 US25 12 6 08 / 0 7 / 2 0 2 3 EXHIBIT G AT T A C H M E N T #9 - P& D ST A F F RE P O R T Pa g e 63 of 19 8 V I C I N I T Y M A P no t t o s c a l e WA L T O N G L O B A L H O L D I N G S , L L C pr e p a r e d f o r AN A L T A / N S P S LA N D T I T L E S U R V E Y O F TR A C T S A , B , C , D & E OF "T H E K E L L O G G T R A C T " CO N T A I N I N G A T O T A L OF 4 7 0 . 8 7 A C R E S PA R T I A L L Y I N T H E C I T Y O F N O R T H A U G U S T A , AN D P A R T I A L L Y I N U N I N C O R P O R A T E D A I K E N C O U N T Y , NE A R B E L V E D E R E SO U T H C A R O L I N A 0 40 0 40 0 80 0 1 I N C H = 4 0 0 F E E T SH E E T O F 2 2 fi e l d JU L Y 2 0 2 2 pl a t 08 / 0 8 / 2 2 dr a w n CW W re v i e w e d FE Q cr e w GA jo b 3 0 0 6 9 . 0 0 0 0 Z:\30069\30069.0000\Survey\DWG\30069S02_ALTA.dwg - Aug 7, 2023 - 3:52:37 PM 68 2 J o h n n i e D o d d s B o u l e v a r d • S u i t e 1 0 0 Mt . P l e a s a n t , S C 2 9 4 6 4 • 8 4 3 . 8 4 9 . 0 2 0 0 ww w . t h o m a s a n d h u t t o n . c o m SI T E 52 0 20 45 US25 12 6 ” ” ””””” ”” ””””””””””” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ”” ”” ” ” ” “ ” ” “ ” ” ” ” “ ” ” “ ” ” ” 08 / 0 7 / 2 0 2 3 AT T A C H M E N T #9 - P& D ST A F F RE P O R T Pa g e 64 of 19 8 GENGERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN NARRATIVE FOR KELLOGG TRACT NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared for D.R. Horton, INC 4234 Wheeler Road Martinez, GA 30907 Prepared by November 19, 2024 CEG Job No.: 2023-0382 EXHIBIT H ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 65 of 198 i Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 General ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of Narrative ............................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 Site Analysis 2.1 Site Characteristics ............................................................................... 2 2.1.1 Location ........................................................................................ 2 2.1.2 Tract Description ............................................................................ 2 2.1.3 Topography and Soils ...................................................................... 2 2.1.4 Wetlands and Sensitive Areas .......................................................... 2 2.1.5 Hydrology ..................................................................................... 3 2.1.6 Flood Plain ..................................................................................... 3 2.2 Existing and Planned Infrastructure ......................................................... 3 2.2.1 Water Service ................................................................................ 3 2.2.2 Sanitary Sewer Service ................................................................... 3 2.2.3 Utility Easements ........................................................................... 4 Chapter 3 Land Use Plan 3.1 General ............................................................................................... 5 3.2 Land Uses ........................................................................................... 5 3.2.1 Commercial ................................................................................... 5 3.2.2 Mixed Residential ........................................................................... 5 3.2.3 Open Space, Parks, Recreational Amenities and Critical areas. .............. 6 3.2.4 Buffers .......................................................................................... 7 3.2.5 Setbacks ....................................................................................... 7 3.3 Marketing Strategy ............................................................................... 8 3.4 Phasing ............................................................................................... 9 Chapter 4 Design Principles 4.1 Interconnectivity ................................................................................ 10 4.1.1 Road System ............................................................................... 10 4.1.2 Pedestrian ................................................................................... 10 4.2 Green Space ...................................................................................... 10 4.3 Riparian Buffer ................................................................................... 11 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 66 of 198 ii Chapter 5 Required Infrastructure 5.1 Roads ............................................................................................... 12 5.2 Water Service .................................................................................... 13 5.3 Sanitary Sewer Service ....................................................................... 13 5.4 Stormwater Detention ......................................................................... 13 Chapter 6 Development Impacts 6.1 General ............................................................................................. 14 6.2 Surrounding Properties ........................................................................ 14 6.3 Traffic ............................................................................................... 14 6.4 Major Roads ...................................................................................... 15 6.5 Recreational Facilities .......................................................................... 15 6.6 Drainage ........................................................................................... 15 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 67 of 198 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL The Kellogg Tract Development is a 467-acre tract located partially within the limits of the City of North Augusta and is currently owned by the Kellogg Corporation. The overall property consists of 3 separate tracts identified as County TMPs 011-19- 01-001, 012-08-01-001, and 011-14-04-045. Majority of the property is located directly between Interstate 520 (Palmetto Parkway) and Edgefield Road with two smaller tracts located east of I-520 and north of Belvedere Clearwater Road. Approximately 86 acres of property (TMP 012-08-01-001) are located within city limits and are currently zoned CR. The remaining property is located in unincorporated Aiken County and will be annexed into city limits concurrently with the rezoning. 1.2 PURPOSE OF NARRATIVE The purpose of this Narrative is to describe in writing the factors and characteristics which affect site planning, the existing and proposed infrastructure, the principals utilized in the design of the development, and the specific elements of the proposed plan. It is the intent that this narrative with the General Development Plan drawing will fully suffice to meet the requirements for submittal in the re-zoning of the property to a PD district. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 68 of 198 2 CHAPTER 2 SITE ANALYSIS 2.1 SITE CHARACTERISTICS 2.1.1 LOCATION The southern portion of the Kellogg Tract is located within the city limits of North Augusta and consists of approximately 86 acres of land. The remaining property to the north is located in unincorporated Aiken County. Properties adjacent to and surrounding the site are located both in the North Augusta city limits and in unincorporated Aiken County. The Kellogg Tract adjoins the new Highland Springs/Alidade development directly to the north and east of the property. The property is bisected by Interstate 520 and located to the east of Highway 25, and north of SC Highway 126 (Belvedere-Clearwater Road). 2.1.2 TRACT DESCRIPTION Kellogg Tract primarily adjoins either residential or undeveloped land that is planned to be the Highland Springs/Alidade development. Portions of the property have gentle to moderate slopes while some of the terrain becomes substantial around the natural wetlands and low-lying draws on the property. The site drains to the tributary running along the east side of Belvedere-Clearwater Road and lies within the Horse Creek drainage basin. The natural ground cover is composed of medium pine and oak trees, together with various other kinds of understory. 2.1.3 TOPOGRAPHY AND SOILS The property lies slightly below the intersection of the Piedmont Region and the Coastal Plain, commonly called the Fall Line. A strip of rolling land along this line, known as the Sand Hill encompasses this tract. Due to this circumstance, the soil can vary considerably across the site, but none are expected to provide insurmountable problems to the development of the land. The topography on site varies from essentially flat terrain along the hilltops to steeper terrain falling to the stream, wetlands and natural draws. Elevations on the site range from 490 on the highest hill to 270 at the southern side of the site where the stream leaves the property. 2.1.4 WETLANDS AND SENSITIVE AREAS A wetlands delineation was completed in January 2024 by Nelson Environmental, INC. Approximately 15 acres of wetlands are located on the property and are fed by approximately 266 LF of perennial stream and 280 LF of intermittent stream. There is also an existing pond located near the center of the wetlands that covers approximately 4 acres of property. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 69 of 198 3 As development work is proposed which would potentially impact wetlands, Federal law requires that the wetlands be field delineated, mapped and submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for concurrence. Then, any impacts such as the filling or piping of wetlands can only be done after a permitting process through the Corps of Engineers. The City of North Augusta also has local regulations in place to protect these sensitive areas. 2.1.5 HYDROLOGY The City of North Augusta has adopted regulations which require that water flows during storm events from a given site not be increased onto downstream properties as a result of the development. Thus, nearly all developments have stormwater detention facilities where the excess runoff is stored for slower release downstream. 2.1.6 FLOOD PLAIN The presence of a recognized 100-year floodplain can have substantial impact to the planning for development of tract of land. Most local ordinances prohibit development in the floodway and limit development in the floodplain fringe. According to Flood Insurance Map Panel Nos. 45003-C0312E, 45003-C0316E, and 45003 C318E, this property does not have an established 100-year floodplain. 2.2 EXISTING AND PLANNED INFRASTRUCTURE 2.2.1 WATER SERVICE Water service to Kellogg Tract will be provided by the City of North Augusta. There is currently a 24-inch main that runs parallel to the Colonial Pipeline easement on the neighboring Highland Springs property. This line will serve the tract east of Interstate 520. There is a 6” main that runs along Edgefield Road that will be looped through the property west of 520 to the existing 8” main on Belvedere Clearwater Road. If additional pressure is required to serve the development, new lines could be brought from the 92-acre tract to the north which has a planned loop from the 12” main north of the 25 connector to the 6” main on Edgefield Road. Another alternative would be to extend a new line from the 24” main where it crosses Belvedere-Clearwater Road to the east of the property. The exact routing of a new water service will be determined with the first section of development and sufficient service is readily available for the development. 2.2.2 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE A sanitary sewer trunk main was extended by the City of North Augusta on the neighboring Highland Springs property along Mims Branch from the Horse Creek Treatment Facility to Old Sudlow Lake Road in the mid-2000s. This line was designed to provide service to Highland Springs development and surrounding areas which includes the Kellogg Tract. The trunk will be accessed by new on-site pump stations and off-site force main which will be routed down Belvedere- Clearwater Road and Old Sudlow Lake Road. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 70 of 198 4 2.2.3 UTILITY EASEMENTS The only known easements on this property is a Dominion Energy over head power easement boarding the tract east of Interstate 520. Should any work be required within their easement, an encroachment permit will be obtained from the utility provider. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 71 of 198 5 CHAPTER 3 LAND USE PLAN 3.1 GENERAL The General Development Plan pictorially shows the elements of the proposed planned development. The plan has been developed around two main roads, one which follows a north south orientation and one that follows an east west orientation through what will traverse the main residential area. The development plan also shows a commercial area along Belvedere Clearwater Road. The rest of the development is made up of single family and mixed residential. 3.2 LAND USES 3.2.1 COMMERCIAL The area shown as C on the plan will be for commercial use. The 27 acres are intended to be developed with uses allowed for general commercial, such as shopping centers, grocery stores, retail, uses permitted in CONA General Commercial district, etc. 3.2.2 MIXED RESIDENTIAL The areas shown as A and B are planned as mixed residential uses and comprised of some 411 acres. Designation A consist of 276 acres and is expected to have single-family detached lots. This pod is planned for a maximum density of 8 units/acre with an average density of 3.6 units/acre. This allows for a maximum of 993 detached units in Pod A. Designation B consist of 135 acres and is expected to include more densely developed uses including single-family, patio homes/cottages, duplexes, town homes, apartments, and condominiums. These areas are expected to have a maximum density of 16 units/acre with an average density of 6 units/acre. This allows for a maximum of 810 residential units in Pod B. The maximum number of apartment units permitted in Pod B is 300 units. Pod B also permits some minor commercial use. This will be limited to uses permitted under the General Commercial district and the maximum building coverage shall not exceed 30,000 SF in all of Pod B if incorporated. The average density across the 411 acres of mixed residential shall not exceed 4.3 units/acre. This allows for a maximum of 1763 units in pods A and B collectively. The GDP proposes multiple pods to be developed in areas A and B. These pods have been delineated based on early planning exercises considering terrain and anticipated utilities, stormwater and roadway infrastructure. Table 1 also references various design standards for each residential use. The current master plan proposes the following residential uses in each pod: ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 72 of 198 6 · Pod A-1: Single-Family Medium Lot; Single-Family Small Lot; Patio Homes · Pod A-2: Single-Family Medium Lot; Single-Family Small Lot; Patio Homes · Pod A-3: Single-Family Large Lot; Single-Family Medium Lot · Pod A-4: Single-Family Small Lot · Pod B-1: Single-Family Small Lot; Cottages; Townhomes · Pod B-2: Single-Family Small Lot; Cottages · Pod B-3: Single-Family Small Lot; Cottages Other uses, such as multi-family residential, condominiums and general commercial are permitted in Pod B with limitations. If these uses are proposed during development, it would be expected they be developed with Pod B-1. Architectural elements include slab construction, masonry, fiber cement siding, and vinyl siding or a combination thereof. Some of the larger single-family detached housing will have garages. Size, placement, and access to garages for the single- family, detached dwellings will be determined and regulated by the developer and/or the builder. Townhome and multi-family units will have front facing garages as follows: for units with widths less than 24 feet an 8-foot garage is allowed, for units with widths equal to or greater than 24 feet a 16-foot garage is allowed. Townhome garages are expected to be provided on the exterior units, but this could change depending on the demand of the market. All mixed residential areas could include some neighborhood commercial such as professional, educational, church, childcare, grocery, laundry, convenience store, etc. 3.2.3 OPEN SPACE, PARKS, RECREATIONAL AMENITIES AND CRITICAL AREAS. As seen on the Plan, approximately 29 acres of property are designated to area designation D which encompasses the wetlands, 50-foot wetland buffer, and other surrounding areas. The 86-acres of property within City limits currently zoned Critical Area (CR) only covers approximately 7 of the 18-acres of environmentally sensitive areas on-site. The property located within pod D will be primarily reserved for passive greenspace. This area may include some low impact development such as walking trails, gazebos, picnic areas, etc. Per section 3.2.6 below, the impervious surfaces in this area shall not exceed 2 acres in total. There may also be a need to install some necessary, but minimal, sewer infrastructure in this area such as, a pump station, underground piping and a potential aerial crossing, due to the nature of the terrain on-site. The purpose of this area designation is to maintain the original intent of the Critical Area zoning by protecting the sensitive areas on-site and maintaining the natural ecosystem to the best extent possible. Allowing for some minor development of amenities will allow this area to be utilized and enjoyed by the community. In addition to designation D, recreational amenities and/or parks will be incorporated into the residential areas. The actual planning and development of these parks or amenities will be undertaken as various sections of the development progress. It is anticipated that portions of the parks will include more formalized features such as swings and other playground type of equipment, whereas other ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 73 of 198 7 portions will consist of more passive areas including trails and natural vegetation. A centralized amenity site in the mixed residential area is also anticipated for the development. This amenity site is expected to encompass approximately 5 to 6 acres of property in Pod B-2 and will include features such as a pool, clubhouse, tennis, pickleball, volleyball, picnic areas, etc. This site is expected to be constructed after the first 400 lots are developed. 3.2.4 BUFFERS The plan indicates certain buffers which are intended to help ease the transition from areas of differing uses. In general, the commercial area to the south will have 50-foot buffers where it abuts a residential use or neighboring properties. 40-foot buffers are called for where single family areas abut neighboring residential properties. 40-foot buffers will also be provided along the main spine roads while 30’ buffers will be provided along the subcollector roads. Riparian buffers will also be provided around environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams and drainage ways. Refer to section 4.3 for additional information. 3.2.5 SETBACKS Setbacks for the various areas within the tract are shown in Table 2. In addition to the setbacks as prescribed in Table 2 the side setback from adjoining residential districts will be 30 feet and from all other districts 10 feet. Front setbacks on single family detached and attached lots shall allow for a driveway of 18’ in length to provide room for parking. 3.2.6 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES Limitations on impervious surface ratios will be enforced based on proposed use as outlined in table 1 below. The percentages in the table provide the maximum impervious area allowed for each use as the property is subdivided and developed as separate tracts. If a mix of lot types is proposed in a tract, calculations shall be provided to determine the average impervious area allowed based on unit distribution across each pod. Impervious area will also be limited based on land use allocation. The maximum impervious area across each pod shall be as follows: · Pods A & B (residential): 35% · Pod C (Commercial): 50% · Pod D (Greenspace): 6% ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 74 of 198 8 TABLE 1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Use Setbacks Impervious Area (Max) Open Space (Min)(1) Permitted Plan Designation Front Rear Side Commercial 25 20 10 70% 20% C, B(8) Residential - Single-Family Large Lot(4) 25 20 8 35% 10% A, B - Single-Family Medium Lot(5) 5/20(3) 20 5 40% 10% A, B - Single-Family Small Lot(6) 5/20(3) 15 5 50% 10% A, B - Cottage(7) 5/20(3) 15 5 50% 10% B - Single-Family Attached(2) 20 20 0/8 70% 20% B - Apartments/Multi-Family 20 35 30 70% 20% B, C(8) (1) The minimum open space required in this table relates to the individual development within each pod. At full build out, the property will have a minimum 25% of the total property acreage (117 acres) dedicated to open space. (2) The minimum width of townhomes shall be 24’. (3) For detached lots that have frontage on both subdivision streets and alleys, one front setback may be 5’ to work with grades as needed. (4) Single-Family Large Lot: Defined as detached lots greater than or equal to 70’ in width to accommodate a product size greater than 54’ in width (5) Single-Family Medium Lot: Defined as detached lots greater than or equal to 50’ in width to accommodate a product type between 40’ and 53’ in width (6) Single-Family Small Lot: Defined as lots greater than or equal to 40’ in width to accommodate a product type between 30’ and 39’ in width (7) Cottage: Defined at detached lots greater than or equal to 30’ in width to accommodate a product type less than 30’ in width. (8) Refer to section 3.2.2 for commercial and multi-family restrictions in pods B and C. 3.3 MARKETING STRATEGY It is anticipated that the owner of this tract will develop the portions of the primary collector roads initially to establish some necessary road and utility infrastructure. From there the marketing strategy will be dictated by the economy and market conditions. The mixed residential pods will likely be developed in 40-or 50-acre tracts, or larger, to establish lots and residents within the community. These individual tracts will likely then be developed in stages as the market dictates by ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 75 of 198 9 the developer. It is understood that at the time of development of the 40-to 50- acre tracts, issues concerning circulation, density, conformance to pod maximum and average densities, etc., will be addressed during the North Augusta approval process. The developer will likely sell the commercial area to other developers that specialize in this type of development. The developer may also wish to sell tracts in designation A and B to other developers, it is anticipated that each of these areas will have its own Property Owners Association (POA) when sold. Each developer of individual tracts will be responsible for property management of that individual parcel as well as development of design plans, permitting of individual sections of the land according to North Augusta ordinances and the overall development of that tract within the framework of this planned development. 3.4 PHASING The phasing of such a large tract of land is primarily dependent upon market forces as they affect the type of product which the buyers desire and the rate at which buyers acquire the various products. Nonetheless, a phasing program has been included on the General Development Plan. In general, it is anticipated that the initial phase of the development will be directed toward the installing portions of the collector road from SC 126 and required utility infrastructure. The timing of completing the collector roads from Edgefield Road to Belvedere Clearwater Road should be dictated by the traffic study depending on projected traffic patterns. The second phase is anticipated to be residential and developed around the construction of the sewer trunks that will run from the end of the low-lying wetlands. The commercial areas are expected to be developed shortly after the initial phase or the first phases of residential depending on the market. Due to the volatility of the economy, the description of the future phases of development is difficult to define. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 76 of 198 10 CHAPTER 4 DESIGN PRINCIPLES 4.1 INTERCONNECTIVITY 4.1.1 ROAD SYSTEM It is the intent of this Plan that portions of the collector road be installed first with the residential areas planned to provide access to the individual pods. This will also allow the developer to run the necessary utility infrastructure down the proposed right-of-way to serve the development. A master traffic impact analysis has been completed and is based on unit counts and uses proposed on the current master plan. This study analyzes the impacts of traffic generated from the development to existing roadways and outlines the required recommendations for off-site and access improvements. As the development progresses and variations to the master plan occur, amendments to the TIA shall be completed. Internal traffic patterns will also be analyzed with sections of development to determine required improvements on-site, as well as the necessary timing of required roadway infrastructure within the development. 4.1.2 PEDESTRIAN All roads will have pedestrian paths on both sides of the road which will provide interconnectivity of the various development pods. For the majority of the site, these paths will be concrete sidewalks. However, the collector and subcollector roads will have 8’ multi-use path on one side and concrete sidewalk on the other. Connectivity to the I-520 multi-use path is also desired by the developer from the site. This is expected to occur with the development of Pods A-2 and A-3. The General Development Plan schematically shows the nature of the pedestrian routes, but the actual design and location will depend on the layout of individual pods. 4.2 GREEN SPACE As mentioned in Section 3.2.6, the Plan reserves approximately 29 acres of property in pod D to designated greenspace surrounding the wetlands. Common open space areas will also be incorporated into pods A, B and C as defined in table 1. At full build out, the development shall have a minimum of 25% open space (117 acres) across the entire property. Green space will include buffers and other green areas which will be associated with the internal development of various pods. It is the intent of the Plan that green spaces be provided to enhance the quality of life for all residents in the development. At least 20% of residences should be within 1000’ of open, parks or the greenway. At the time of individual pod development, issues of green space will be further defined and calculated so as to conform to City standards. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 77 of 198 11 4.3 RIPARIAN BUFFER It is acknowledged that the City of North Augusta requires a riparian buffer of 50 feet on each side of drainage ways, streams and wetlands. It is evident that several natural draws run through the property, to the wetlands, which drain surrounding properties as well as the I-520 corridor. Due to the nature of the site, several ponds and sanitary sewer utilities are expected to be located in these depressions where jurisdictional streams or wetlands have not been identified. Several strategic road crossings will also be required to allow for access to various portions of the property and interconnectivity through the development. Aside from these improvements, these drainage ways will be left natural to the best extent possible to allow water to flow naturally through the development to the proposed ponds and ultimately to the wetlands. In some cases, improvements to these depressions will need to be implemented. This may involve defining and stabilizing channels appropriately to control stormwater through areas of development. At the time of preliminary plat approval, the City will consider accepting the designated open space that the applicant is willing to dedicate in addition to the required dedication. The site lies in both the Willow Wick Basin and Horse Creek drainage basins. Both basins are studied and monitored for TMDL of specified pollutants. Additional protection measures in accordance with section 13.2 of the NADC will be considered during design and development around the wetlands. If encroachments to the 50’ undisturbed buffer are proposed within reason, the appropriate design measures will be taken to achieve buffer encroachment approval. The City also requires a mandatory 25’ undisturbed buffer around the wetlands which shall be maintained aside from work associated with required sanitary sewer infrastructure. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 78 of 198 12 CHAPTER 5 REQUIRED INFRASTRUCTURE 5.1 ROADS The primary roads within the project will be the collector and subcollector roads shown on the General Development Plan. The collector roads will have a 90-foot right-of-way with sidewalk on one side and multi-use path on the other. The General Development Plan shows a typical cross section for this road which is expected to have a 12’ center cut median, two travel lanes with 13 feet of pavement and concrete curb and gutters and no on-street parking. Curb cuts will be limited along these roads and no residential driveway connections will be permitted. 12-foot turn lanes will also be provided at the required intersections. The General Development plan also proposes subcollector roads. These roads will have a 60-foot right-of-way with sidewalk on one side and multi-use path on the other. The purpose of these roads is to traverse the steeper terrain of the site from the collector road and to provide access to the various residential pods. These will not be lot fronting roads and no residential driveway cuts will be permitted. These roads are intended to be utilized primarily by residents of the community. Some rear ally streets will also be incorporated into Pods A and B to allow for rear access to cottages, patio homes, and townhomes. These roads will follow the design criteria of the North Augusta Development Code. The remaining roads shown on the Plan will be subdivision roads depending upon final design and traffic counts. The individual subdivision roads will have a section based on a 50-foot right-of-way with 24 feet of pavement and concrete curb and gutters. This base section would not support on-street parking. Where it is determined that on-street parking is desired, the street section will be widened to accommodate. Cul-de-sac radii for the minor roads will be 40 feet to back of curb. Individual subdivision roads may be designed and constructed to narrower standards provided that such design is in accordance with City guidelines during the approval process. As required by NADC 4.12.13.9, two additional elements shall be implemented to qualify for zoning to the PD district. The multi-use path will be provided on collector and major subdivision roads in lieu of a bike lane. This will also provide a connection to the 520 greenway to promote its use. Also, customized entries will be provided at the proposed connection to SC126 and US25. If this cannot be provided at these entries due to signalize intersection restraints, the alternative will be to provide customized entries at all connections of the local and subcollector roads to the connector road. These approximate locations have been shown on the GDP for reference but may change slightly in design once the exact location of driveways are determined. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 79 of 198 13 5.2 WATER SERVICE Water service will be obtained from the City of North Augusta. Individual areas to be developed will be designed such that water lines are looped and cross connected to the various areas to provide a reinforced system throughout the tract. Water systems will be designed according to South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control requirements as well as those of the City of North Augusta. Simultaneously with the first phase of development a master overall water plan will be submitted to the City for approval. The plan will show the general concept for main lines but will not have details of individual lots since these will be developed in phases. 5.3 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE Sanitary sewer service for the majority of the development will be by gravity flow to a new pump station to be located on-site. The pump station will feed a force main that will be routed to the existing sanitary trunk main located at Old Sudlow Lake Road and Mimms Branch. All sanitary sewer extensions will be designed in accordance with the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control and City of North Augusta guidelines. Simultaneously with the first phase of development a master overall sewer plan will be submitted to the City for approval. The plan will show the general concept for the main sewer but will not have details of individual pods since these will be developed at the time that 40-to-50-acre tracts are developed. 5.4 STORMWATER DETENTION While the final stormwater detention for the entire tract may ultimately be provided by some regional ponds, early development in both the residential and commercial sections may require individual/temporary detention ponds. Such facilities will be designed as needed and will be done according to the City of North Augusta standards. Most of the detention on-site will be positioned in the natural draws near the end of the wetlands. These ponds will be designed to handle off-site flows and address stormwater quality and quantity. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 80 of 198 14 CHAPTER 6 DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS 6.1 GENERAL The development of a large tract of land, by its nature, can impact the surrounding areas and property owners. The influx of a large number of new homeowners can affect traffic, utilities, recreational facilities, schools and other factors. 6.2 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES The development of Kellogg Tract is not anticipated to directly affect the majority of surrounding properties. Approximately 27 acres is intended to be general commercial. This will provide an asset to surrounding residential property. This development is planned at Belvedere Clearwater Road and will be developed on the east side of the Ridgefield Drive connection to provide separation from existing residences. The bulk of the remaining surrounding lands is already residential and should be compatible with the residential uses proposed. Where higher density residential, such as mixed residential is developed, buffers will be provided. Finally, in areas where commercial is developed on the tract, these facilities will be compatible with single family residential uses and will provide an asset for the use of residents located near Highland Springs/Alidade. It is anticipated that the proposed development will enhance rather than detract from property values of surrounding lands. 6.3 TRAFFIC The influx of some 1,763 (maximum expected) residential units, some 1,000 (maximum expected) employees and outside customers of neighborhood business obviously increases traffic. Fortunately, the collector roads will facilitate the movement of the traffic to the major and minor arterial roads of U.S. 25 and Belvedere Clearwater Road. Nonetheless, the presence of these roads should help the internal traffic generated by the development to have less impact on surrounding roads. There undoubtedly will be increases to the traffic counts. A master traffic impact study has been prepared by Kimley-Horn titled “Kellogg Tract Traffic Impact Analysis” and dated October, 2024. This traffic study will be submitted for review, and approved by local and state regulators prior to beginning the first section of development. This study analyzes the impact of traffic generated onto adjacent roadways for the development in its entirety based on the current master plan. The current master plan accounts for 1268 residential units and 74,000 SF of commercial use as defined in the TIA. There is some opportunity for additional units to be incorporated with changes in the demand of the market. If this occurs, amendments to the TIA will be required. Based on previous experience, it is more beneficial to analyze the timing of recommended mitigation and internal traffic once ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 81 of 198 15 some initial design has occurred and master plan has been modified. This will provide better clarity on required phasing and density of the development. This will also allow for some of the internal traffic patterns to be analyzed to determine requirements for on-site infrastructure. 6.4 MAJOR ROADS The major roads impacted by the development are U.S. 25 and Belvedere- Clearwater Road. U.S. 25 has fairly heavy traffic during parts of the day and the proposed development will add to that number. Traffic along Belvedere clearwater road is expected to increase rapidly based on the anticipated development coming to this area. However, the proposed entrance has close proximity to the 520 interchange and will allow traffic to access the interstate quickly from the site. Both roads are 4-lane roadways with center left turn lane, and it is not likely that the volume of traffic to be generated from the Kellogg Tract development will cause the number of lanes to increase. 6.5 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES There are no known North Augusta Recreational Facilities in close proximity to the project tract. However, the inclusion of a number of parks, amenities and green areas associated with the Kellogg Tract Development provides for such facilities to be in close proximity to the future residents. Thus, the development should not adversely affect the existing recreational facilities. 6.6 DRAINAGE The property general drains towards the wetlands on-site which flow to a pipe under Interstate 520 ultimately reaching Horse Creek by way of an unnamed tributary. It is intended that the development will have several detention ponds to control stormwater runoff quantity and quality from the developed site. Some of the ponds may be considered regional based on design and drainage area. The design of each section of the development will need to analyze runoff to meet the City of North Augusta Standards. While this property has potential for substantial development due to its size, there are several natural drainage ways through the property that convey stormwater from the surrounding properties bounded by Edgefield Road, Belvedere Clearwater Road and Interstate 520 to the wetlands. Although these draws were reported to be mostly dry in the recent wetland delineation, it is intended to leave these areas natural to the best extent possible as mentioned in Section 4.3. This will allow water to follow its natural course through the site to the wetlands. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 82 of 198 IN D E P E N D E N C E A M E N I T Y C O N C E P T S E P T E M B E R 2 0 , 2 0 1 7 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 83 of 198 October 2024 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis North Augusta, South Carolina Prepared for Cranston Engineering Prepared by EXHIBIT I ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 84 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 85 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis Page i October 2024 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................1 1Introduction ...........................................................................................................................5 1.1Study Area .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2Approved Developments ............................................................................................................. 6 2Existing and Future No Build Traffic Volume Development ............................................10 2.1Existing Traffic Development ..................................................................................................... 10 2.2Future-Year No-Build Traffic Volume Development ................................................................... 10 3Project Traffic .....................................................................................................................13 3.1Trip Generation ......................................................................................................................... 13 3.2Trip Distribution & Assignment .................................................................................................. 14 3.32034 Build Traffic Development ................................................................................................. 18 4Capacity Analysis ...............................................................................................................21 4.1Belvedere Clearwater Road at Edgefield Road .......................................................................... 22 4.2Edgefield Road at Georgia Avenue ........................................................................................... 23 4.3Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 ................................................. 24 4.4Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Westbound Ramps ........................................................... 26 4.5Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Eastbound Ramps ............................................................ 27 4.6Belvedere Clearwater Road at Cherokee Drive/Buchanan Parkway........................................... 28 4.7Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road .............................................................. 29 4.8Edgefield Road at Hampton Avenue .......................................................................................... 30 4.9Edgefield Road at Celeste Avenue ............................................................................................ 31 4.10Edgefield Road at Johnson Road .......................................................................................... 32 4.11Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector ...................................................................................... 33 4.12US 25 Connector at I-520 Westbound Ramps ....................................................................... 34 4.13US 25 Connector at I-520 Eastbound Ramps ........................................................................ 35 4.14Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road ................................................................................. 36 4.15Edgefield Road at Clearmont Road ....................................................................................... 37 4.16Buchanan Parkway at Site Access #3 ................................................................................... 38 4.17Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 ......................................................................................... 39 4.18Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ............................................................................................. 40 5Conclusion ..........................................................................................................................41 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 86 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis Page ii October 2024 List of Figures Figure ES-1 – 2034 Build Recommended Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control ................................... 4 Figure 1 –Study Area Map ....................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 2 – Existing Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control ...................................................................... 9 Figure 3 – 2024 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .............................................................................. 11 Figure 4 – 2034 No-Build Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................................................ 12 Figure 5 – Entering Project Trip Distribution ........................................................................................... 15 Figure 6 – Exiting Project Trip Distribution ............................................................................................. 16 Figure 7 – Project Trip Assignment ........................................................................................................ 17 Figure 8 – 2034 Build AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................................................ 19 Figure 9 – 2034 Build PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................................................ 20 Figure 10 – Recommended Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control ...................................................... 44 List of Tables Table 1 – Trip Generation Summary ...................................................................................................... 13 Table 2 –HCM Level of Service Criteria ................................................................................................ 21 Table 3 – Belvedere Clearwater Road at Edgefield Road Capacity Analysis Results .............................. 22 Table 4 – Edgefield Road at Georgia Avenue Capacity Analysis Results................................................ 23 Table 5 – Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #1 Capacity Analysis Results ..... 24 Table 6 – Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Westbound Ramps Capacity Analysis Results ............... 26 Table 7 – Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Eastbound Ramps Capacity Analysis Results ................ 27 Table 8 – Belvedere Clearwater Road at Buchanan Parkway Capacity Analysis Results ........................ 28 Table 9 – Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road Capacity Analysis Results .................. 29 Table 10 – Edgefield Road at Hampton Avenue Capacity Analysis Results ............................................ 30 Table 11 – Edgefield Road at Celeste Avenue Capacity Analysis Results .............................................. 31 Table 12 – Edgefield Road at Johnson Road Capacity Analysis Results ................................................ 32 Table 13 – Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector Capacity Analysis Results ............................................ 33 Table 14 – US 25 Connector at I-520 Westbound Ramps Capacity Analysis Results ............................. 34 Table 15 – US 25 Connector at I-520 Eastbound Ramps Capacity Analysis Results .............................. 35 Table 16 – Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road Capacity Analysis Results ...................................... 36 Table 17 – Edgefield Road at Clearmont Road Capacity Analysis Results ............................................. 37 Table 18 – Buchanan Parkway at Site Access #3 Capacity Analysis Results.......................................... 38 Table 19 – Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 Capacity Analysis Results ................................................ 39 Table 20 – Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Results ................................................................................ 40 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 87 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis Page iii October 2024 List of Appendices A – Conceptual Site Plan B – Turning Movement Counts C – Growth Rate Worksheets D – Traffic Volume Development Worksheets E – Capacity Analysis Worksheets F – Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Worksheets G – Turn Lane Warrant Worksheets ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 88 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 1 October 2024 Executive Summary This report summarizes the traffic impact of the proposed Kellogg Tract Development in North Augusta, South Carolina. The proposed development is expected to be constructed and occupied by 2034. It is our understanding that Cranston Engineeringis assisting in the engineering and development of 1,213 lots for single family detached housing, 55 lots for single family attached housing, a gas station (4 KSF), a day care (15 KSF), office space (30 KSF), strip retail (25 KSF), and restaurant space (15 KSF). Access to the site is planned via Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive, along Edgefield Road between Johnson Road and Whatley Street, and at Buchanan Parkway. The conceptual site plan is provided in Appendix A. This traffic impact analysis (TIA) evaluates traffic operations under 2024 Existing, 2034 No Build, 2034 Build, and 2034 Build Improved conditions during the AM and PM peak hours at the following study intersections: Belvedere Clearwater Road at Edgefield Road Edgefield Road at Georgia Avenue Belvedere Clearwater Road Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 WB Ramps Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 EB Ramps Belvedere Clearwater Road at Buchanan Parkway Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road Edgefield Road at Hampton Avenue Edgefield Road at Celeste Avenue Edgefield Road at Johnson Road Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector US 25 Connector at I-520 WB Ramps US 25 Connector at I-520 EB Ramps Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road Edgefield Road at Clearmont Road Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 Buchanan Parkway at Site Access #3 Kimley-Horn was retained to determine the potential traffic impacts of this development in accordance with the traffic study guidelines in the South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) Access and Roadside Management Standards (ARMS). This report presents trip generation, distribution, capacity analyses, and recommended improvements to meet anticipated traffic demands. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 89 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 2 October 2024 The following improvements are proposed to accommodate the 2034 Build traffic conditions due to the impact of the site: Belvedere Clearwater Road at Edgefield Road Signal timing updates are recommended to accommodate the new traffic patterns. Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 Site access is recommended to be constructed as the southbound approach to the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive. The access should consist of one ingress and two egress lanes. The egress should consist of a dedicated left turn lane with 200 feet of storage with appropriate taper and a shared through-right. It is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) once the proposed development is constructed and occupied. It is recommended to convert to a signalized intersection when warranted. It is recommended to construct a 300-foot westbound right-turn lane with appropriate taper. Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Westbound Ramps Signal timing adjustments are recommended to accommodate new traffic patterns and to operate in coordination with the existing signal at the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Eastbound Ramps and the recommended signal at the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Buchanan Parkway. Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Eastbound Ramps Signal timing adjustments are recommended to accommodate new traffic patterns and to operate in coordination with the existing signal at the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Westbound Ramps and the recommended signal at the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Buchanan Parkway. Belvedere Clearwater Road at Buchanan Parkway This intersection is proposed to be signalized per the Alidade Section 1A TIA (Kimley- Horn, June 2024). o The signal timings from this intersection should be coordinated and optimized with the inclusion of the proposed Kellogg Tract Development Volumes Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road As part of the Alidade Section 1A TIA (Kimley-Horn, June 2024), an additional southbound right turn lane with 250 feet of storage and appropriate taper was recommended for mitigation. With this improvement, no further mitigation is recommended at this intersection. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 90 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 3 October 2024 Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector Adjust timings operating in coordination with the existing signal at the intersection of Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector at I-520 Westbound Ramps Adjust timings to improve operations of the intersection based on new traffic patterns. Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road Adjust timings operating in coordination with the existing signal at the intersection of Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector Buchanan Parkway at Site Access #3 Site access is recommended to be constructed with one ingress lane and one full movement egress lane as the eastbound approach to the existing intersection of Buchanan Parkway and Highland Springs Middle School Access. Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 Site access is recommended to be constructed as the westbound approach to the proposed intersection of Edgefield Road at Site Access #1. The approach is recommended to consist of one ingress lane and two egress lanes. The egress should consist of a shared through-left lane and a dedicated right turn lane with 150 feet of storage. It is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the MUTCD once the proposed development is constructed and occupied. It is recommended to convert to a signalized intersection when warranted. It is recommended to construct a 150-foot northbound right-turn lane with appropriate taper. The 2034 Build recommended geometry and traffic control is illustrated in Figure ES-1. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 91 of 198 Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorthBoulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e ld Dr i v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I- 5 2 0 W B O f f I- 5 2 0 W B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d BuchananParkway HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue Johnson Road JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga LakeRoad US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I- 5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue Kellogg Tract Development Figure ES-1 -Recommended Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control TWLT TW L T TW L T TW L T TW L T TW L T TW L T Driveway Driveway Sit e Ac c e ss #2 Project Site Project Site SiteAccess#3 SiteAccess#1 Legend Existing Laneage Recommended Laneage Existing Signal Recommended Signal Existing Stop Control Recommended Stop Control S = 300' S= 1 0 0 ' S = 150' S= 2 0 0 ' S = 2 5 0 ' Signal to be installed per the AlidadeSection1A TIA, this is not an improvementfor the Kelogg Tract Development ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 92 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 5 October 2024 1 Introduction This report summarizes the traffic impact of the proposed Kellogg Tract Development in North Augusta, South Carolina. The proposed development is expected to be constructed and occupied by 2034. It is our understanding that Cranston Engineeringis assisting in the engineering and development of 1,213 lots for single family detached housing, 55 lots for single family attached housing, a gas station (4 KSF), a day care (15 KSF), office space (30 KSF), strip retail (25 KSF), and restaurant space (15 KSF). Access to the site is planned via Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive, along Edgefield Road between Johnson Road and Whatley Street, and at Buchanan Parkway. The study area map is provided in Figure 1. This traffic impact analysis (TIA) evaluates traffic operations under 2024 Existing, 2034 No-Build, 2034 Build, and 2034 Build-Improved conditions during the AM and PM peak hours at the following study intersections: Belvedere Clearwater Road at Edgefield Road Edgefield Road at Georgia Avenue Belvedere Clearwater Road Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 WB Ramps Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 EB Ramps Belvedere Clearwater Road at Cherokee Drive/Buchanan Parkway Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road Edgefield Road at Hampton Avenue Edgefield Road at Celeste Avenue Edgefield Road at Johnson Road Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector US 25 Connector at I-520 WB Ramps US 25 Connector at I-520 EB Ramps Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road Edgefield Road at Clearmont Road Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 Buchanan Parkway at Site Access #3 1.1 Study Area The primary roadways within the vicinity of the proposed development are I-520, Belvedere Clearwater Road, Edgefield Road, US 25 Connector, Ascauga Lake Road, Buchanan Parkway, and Old Sudlow Lake Road.Figure 2 shows the existing roadway geometry and traffic control. Key characteristics of each of the study area roadways are summarized below. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 93 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 6 October 2024 I-520 is a four-lane, divided interstate with a posted speed limit of 60 miles per hour (mph) within the vicinity of the study area. Per SCDOT traffic count data at station 02-2605, I-520 had a 2023 AADT of 20,000 vehicles per day (vpd) north of Belvedere Clearwater Road. Belvedere Clearwater Road is a four-lane, undivided with a two-way left-turn lane, urban minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 45 mph within the vicinity of the proposed development. Per SCDOT traffic count data at station 02-0203, Belvedere Clearwater Road had a 2023 AADT of 9,600 vpd. Edgefield Road is a four-lane, undivided with a two-way left-turn lane, urban principal arterial with a posted speed limit of 45 mph within the vicinity of the proposed development. Per SCDOT traffic count data at station 02-0131 and 02-0129, Edgefield Road had a 2023 AADT of 20,400 vpd north of Belvedere Clearwater Road and 25,800 vpd south of Belvedere Clearwater Road. US 25 Connector is a four-lane, divided, urban minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 mph within the vicinity of the proposed development. Per SCDOT traffic count data at station 02-0254, US 25 Connector had a 2023 AADT of 3,600 vpd. Ascauga Lake Road is a two-lane, undivided with a two-way left-turn lane, urban major collector with a posted speed limit of 45 mph within the vicinity of the proposed development. There are no SCDOT count stations along this section of Ascauga Lake Road. Buchanan Parkway is a two-lane, divided road with a 25 mph speed limit, which serves both the proposed development and the new Highland Springs Middle School. Old Sudlow Lake Road is a two-lane, undivided, urban major collector with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour (mph) within the vicinity of the proposed development. There are no SCDOT count stations along this section of Old Sudlow Lake Road. 1.2 Approved Developments The following recommendations were made in the Kellogg Tract study area in the Alidade Section 1A TIA (Kimley-Horn, June 2024) for the Highland Springs Development: Belvedere Clearwater Road at Cherokee Drive/Buchanan Parkway Buchanan Parkway should consist of two ingress and two egress lanes. The egress should consist of a dedicated right turn lane and a shared through-left. Conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the MUTCD once the number of dwelling units are constructed and occupied identified under Scenario 4, which consists of 200 single family detached houses and 200 single family townhome units. Convert to a signalized intersection when warranted. When constructed, this signal should be placed under coordination with the adjacent signal at the I-520 interchange. Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road Construct a 250-foot southbound right turn lane with appropriate taper. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 94 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 7 October 2024 Buchanan Parkway at School Campus Entrance Construct a northbound right turn lane with 150 feet of storage length and appropriate taper. Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 EB Ramps Adjust timings to operate in coordination with the proposed signal at the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Cherokee Drive/Buchanan Parkway. Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 WB Ramps Adjust timings to operate in coordination with the proposed signal at the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Cherokee Drive/Buchanan Parkway. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 95 of 198 McQueeney Tract Residential Development Figure 1 -Project Location Map 8 9 3 4 7 2 11 13 Project Site 5 6 16 10 15 1 14 12 StudyIntersections 1.)Belvedere Clearwater Road at Edgefield Road 2.) EdgefieldRoad at Georgia Avenue 3.) Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 4.) Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 WB Ramps 5.) Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 EB Ramps 6.) Belvedere Clearwater Road at Buchanan Parkway 7.) Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road 8.) Edgefield Road at Hampton Avenue 9.) Edgefield Road at Celeste Avenue 10.) Edgefield Road at Johnson Road 11.) Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector 12.) US 25 Connector at I-520 WB Ramps 13.) US 25 Connector at I-520 EB Ramps 14.) Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road 15.) Edgefield Road at Clearmont Road 16.) Buchanan Parkway at Site Access #3 17.) Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 17 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 96 of 198 Ed g e f i e l d R o a d ChaletNorthBoulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e ld Dr i v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I- 5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I-5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w L a k e R o a d BuchananParkway HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue Johnson Road Johnson Road ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga LakeRoad US 25 Connector Road I- 5 2 0 S B I- 5 2 0 N B GeorgiaAvenue Kellogg Tract Development Figure 2 -Existing Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control TWLT TW L T TW L T TW L T TW L T TW L T TW L T Driveway Driveway Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 97 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 10 October 2024 2 Existing and Future No Build Traffic Volume Development 2.1 Existing Traffic Development Turning movement counts were conducted during the AM (7:00 AM – 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 PM – 6:00 PM) peak periods on Thursday, May 9th, 2024, at the following intersections: Belvedere Clearwater Road at Edgefield Road Edgefield Road at Georgia Avenue Belvedere Clearwater Road Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 WB Ramps Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 EB Ramps Belvedere Clearwater Road at Buchanan Parkway Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road Edgefield Road at Hampton Avenue Edgefield Road at Celeste Avenue Edgefield Road at Johnson Road Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector US 25 Connector at I-520 WB Ramps US 25 Connector at I-520 EB Ramps Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road Edgefield Road at Clearmont Road Figure 3 shows the 2024 Existing AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes, respectively. The turning movement count data is provided in Appendix B. 2.2 Future-Year No-Build Traffic Volume Development The proposed development is expected to be built and fully occupied by 2034. Based upon count station data from SCDOT, the study area has experienced an annual 1.2% growth rate over the past 10 years and an annual growth rate of 2% since 2021. Edgefield Road during 2018 through 2020 is observed to have abnormal volumes due to construction and pandemic conditions. Therefore, the short-term growth rate was only analyzed dating back to 2021. A 2% annual growth rate was used in addition to the projected traffic generation from Alidade Section1A (Kimley-Horn, June 2024) and Rushing Waters (AECOM, December 2024) to create the 2034 No-Build traffic volumes. The growth rate calculations and background development traffic volumes are provided in Appendix C. Figure 4 shows 2034 AM and PM peak-hour No-Build traffic volumes. Worksheets documenting the traffic volume development are provided in Appendix D. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 98 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! (546)556(22)3 (40)0(510) 10(29)(577) (48)115 505(536) 503 246(171) 13(14) 1 (10) 3(1) 19 (34) (345)266(30)14(6)8 (33) 25(29) (8) (7) 1 27 6 10 (48) 476(0)101(644)387 99(5)346(226) 575(447) 42 83(778) (46)590(513)16 (177) 0(0) 0(0) 536 0(0)765(607)19 0(0) (0)0 (25) (4)95(783)435 (85) 116 20 (21)37 534275(322) (7) (50)94 (0)0 (30)20 (2) 2(0)2(0) (6)7 (0)0 0 0(0) 0(0) (503) 9(12) (553) (2) 223(183) 299(558) 1(1) (0)0 (4)1 (1) 289 (0)0(0) 0(3) (18) 0 (13)11(294)378 (0) 19 0 0 (7)7 (12)12 Kellogg Tract DevelopmentFigure 3 -Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I-5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I-5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 99 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 8 1(34) (345)266 (30)14(6) 27(33) 25(29) (644)387 (7)6 (48)115 (783)435 (85)42 (778)5363(510)476(8)19 (22)(40)83 (4)95 (177)101(7)10 (546)556 19(25)590(513)765(607)16(46)275(322)10(29)116(48) 99(5) 13(14)534(577)505(536)346(226)575(447) 246(171) 0(0) 3(1)0(0) 20(10) (21)37 (50)94 (30)20 (6)7(0)0 1(2) 2(0) 2(0) (7)7 (12)12 (0)0 (0)0(0) 0(3) 0 (0)0 378 (13)11(1)0 (294) (4)1 (12)9 (0)0 19(18)1(1)0(0) 0(2)299(558)0(0) 289(553) 503(503)223(183) Kellogg Tract DevelopmentFigure 4 -2034 No-Build Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I-5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I-5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 100 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 13 October 2024 3 Project Traffic 3.1 Trip Generation The trip generation rates and equations published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual; 11th Edition were used to estimate the trip generation potential for the proposed development. The analysis was performed using the information provided for the following land use codes (LUCs): LUC 210 – Single-Family Detached Housing LUC 215 – Single-Family Attached Housing LUC 565 – Day Care Center LUC 710 – General Office Building LUC 822 – Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) LUC 932 – High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant LUC 945 – Convenience Store/Gas Station (9-15 Fueling Positions) The estimated trip generation for the proposed Kellogg Tract Development is summarized in Table 1, which indicates that the development has the potential to generate 1,113 trips (410 in/703 out) during the AM peak hour and 1,494 trips (873 in/621 out) during the PM peak hour. Table 1 – Trip Generation Summary Kellogg Tract Trip Generation Land Use IntensityUnitsDaily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out 710 - General Office Building 30.0KSF4075952 7611051 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station (9-15 Fueling Positions)4.0KSF 2,802 226 113113218 109 109 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (<40k)25.0KSF 1,2855935 24 1658283 932 - High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 15.0KSF 1,608 144 79 65 1368353 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing1,213DU 10,024722 1805421,038654 384 215 - Single-Family Attached Housing55DU369236 17291712 565 - Day Care Center 15.0KSF714165 87 78 1677889 Subtotal 17,209 1,398 552 846 1,814 1,033 781 Internal Capture 3,422 143 71 72 170 85 85 Pass-By 2,254 142 71 71 150 75 75 Total Net New External Trips 11,533 1,113 410 703 1,494 873 621 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 101 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 14 October 2024 3.2 Trip Distribution & Assignment New external trips generated by the proposed development were distributed and assigned to the surrounding roadway network based on existing travel patterns, adjacent land uses, and the proposed site layout. Note that entering and exiting trips are not expected to follow reciprocal routes based on the nature of the surrounding roadway network. The following site traffic distributions were determined as follows: 25% to/from the south via I-520 15% to/from the north via I-520 20% to/from the north via Edgefield Road 10% to/from the south via Knox Avenue 8% to/from the south via Georgia Avenue 8% to/from the east via Belvedere Clearwater Road 4% to/from the east via Old Sudlow Lake Road 2% to/from the east via Buchanan Parkway 2% to/from the north via Ascauga Lake Road 1% to/from the south via Cherokee Drive 1% to/from the west via Hampton Avenue 1% to/from the west via Clearmont Drive 1% to/from the west via Johnson Road 1% to/from the west via Celeste Avenue 1% to/from the west via Georgia Avenue The entering and exiting project distribution used in the analysis is illustrated in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively. Anticipated project trips for the proposed development are illustrated in Figure 7. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 102 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 8% 1% 10%4%1% 40%31%14%1%11%8% 1% 1% 1% 1% 10% 5% 2% Kellogg Tract DevelopmentFigure 5 -Entering Project Trip Distribution Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d D r i v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I-5 2 0 W B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O n I-5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e Dr i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Buchanan Parkway HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue Johnson Road JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d AscaugaLake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B R a m p s GeorgiaAvenue SiteAccess#1 Si t e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#3 20% 1% 2% 4% 8% 10% 5% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 8% 10% 20% 5% Driveway Driveway Project Site Project Site Legend xx%Inbound Trip Distribution ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 103 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 18%8% 19% 11% 1% 14% 4%2%4% 12%1%1%2%2%1%3%2% 5% 9% 36% 5%10% 10% Kellogg Tract DevelopmentFigure 6 -Exiting Project Trip Distribution Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard Elizabeth Avenue Rid g e f i e l d D r i v e Belvedere ClearwaterRoad I- 5 2 0 W B O f f I- 5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I-5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Buchanan Parkway HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I- 5 2 0 W B R a m p s I-5 2 0 E B R a m p s GeorgiaAvenue SiteAccess#1 Si t e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#35% 1% 2% 4% 8% 20% 10% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 8% 10% 20% 5% Driveway Driveway Project Site Project Site Legend xx%Outbound Trip Distribution ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 104 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 30 4 78(141) (25)28 (47) (70)33 (112)127 (50)57 (118)134 (69)78 (6)7 (96)103(9)4 (25)28(87)41 33(70)45(96)84(75)7(6)7(6)14(12)141(283) 7(6)14(12)164(349)(9) (31)35 4(9) (9)4 (9)4 253(224)63(55) (9)4 35 (62)70(31) (62)70 41(87) 21(43) 8(17) Kellogg Tract DevelopmentFigure 7 -Project Trip Assignment Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I-5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I-5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway Project Site SiteAccess#1 Sit e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#3 Project Site ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 105 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 18 October 2024 3.3 2034 Build Traffic Development The project traffic volumes from the proposed development were added to the 2034 No-Build traffic volumes to develop the 2034 Build traffic volumes. The 2034 Build traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours are illustratedin Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 106 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 10 358 17 33 30 1 579278631 58 800 453 12 175 27 (-17)668 7 4 73612(17)58 172130178 182(18) 33825873470 144 1,03223 771 347 25 716(-18) 35 0 4 0 0 0280 49115 24 13 0 122 271(18) 81(18) 27 280 0 0 0 0 499 870 1 85 0 66 1 0 0 386 0352 613 280 Kellogg Tract DevelopmentFigure 8 -2034 Build AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I-5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I-5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway Project Site SiteAccess#1 Sit e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#3 Project Site Legend xxAM PeakHourTraffic Volumes (xx) AM Peak Hour Pass-by Trips ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 107 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 613 240 674 0 2 727 0 5 79 0 116 1 0 390 791 04 0 0 26 22 (19) 74(19) 243 200 37 16 0 3561 1 0 0 0210 31 0 243 25 751(-19)90987754309 68 87530 749 369(19) 9 (18)105 30075140 498 35 84 19 (-18)652 9 27 809 1,083 110 1,162179 870 40 35 41 7 495 37 Kellogg Tract DevelopmentFigure 9 -2034 Build PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I-5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I-5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway Project Site SiteAccess#1 Sit e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#3 Project Site Legend xxPM PeakHourTraffic Volumes (xx) PM Peak Hour Pass-by Trips ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 108 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 21 October 2024 4 Capacity Analysis Capacity/level-of-service (LOS) analyses were conducted using Synchro Version 12 traffic analysis software, which utilizes the methodologies contained within the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM),6th Edition. Capacity analyses were conducted for the AM and PM peak hours of travel under 2024 Existing, 2034 No-Build, and 2034 Build conditions. Intersection LOS grades range from LOS A to LOS F, where the specific grades assigned to a given movement or approach are based on driver perception research and defined by the amount of control delay experienced by each vehicle. LOS A operations correspond with ideal, free-flow conditions where vehicles experience little to no delay, whereas LOS F operations are characterized by high vehicular delays and over-capacity conditions. Please note that it is not uncommon for unsignalized intersections to operate at LOS E or LOS F during peak hours of travel.Table 2 lists the LOS control delay thresholds published in the HCM for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Table 2 –HCM Level of Service Criteria Level-of-Service Control Delay per Vehicle (sec/veh) Thresholds (HCM 6th Edition) Level-of-Service (LOS)Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections A 10 10 B > 10 – 20 > 10 – 15 C > 20 – 35 > 15 – 25 D > 35 – 55 > 25 – 35 E > 55 – 80 > 35 – 50 F > 80 > 50 As part of the intersection analyses, SCDOT’s default Synchro parameters were utilized. Existing peak hour factors (PHFs) were utilized for the existing intersections and the PHFs for proposed intersections were assumed to be 0.9. Existing heavy vehicle percentages were utilized for all scenarios, with a minimum of 2% considered. The following sections outline the results of the capacity analysis for each of the study intersections. The capacity analysis worksheets are included in Appendix E. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 109 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 22 October 2024 4.1 Belvedere Clearwater Road at Edgefield Road The capacity analysis results at the signalized intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Edgefield Road are summarized in Table 3. Table 3 – Belvedere Clearwater Road at Edgefield Road Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (Elizabeth Avenue) WB (Belvedere Clearwater Road) NB (Edgefield Road) SB (Edgefield Road)Intersection EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)D (37.6)C (23.2)B (17.3)B (11.8)B (17.2)Synchro 95th Q 51'152'156'26'12' 182' 35' 101'155' 2034 No-Build LOS (Delay)D (41.4)C (23.5)C (20.7)B (15.1)B (19.8)Synchro 95th Q 65'228'231'45'16' 247' 40' 135'213' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)D (42.3)C (24.3)C (21.5)B (16.0)C (20.8)Synchro 95th Q 72'#314'#307'59'16' 268' 42' 137'231' 2034 Build-Improved LOS (Delay)D (40.7)C (24.2)C (21.7)B (16.0)C (20.8)Synchro 95th Q 55'223'220'30'14' 221' 36' #137'222' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)D (37.3)C (26.1)B (17.4)B (10.0)B (17.0)Synchro 95th Q 8'78'78'0'3' 160' 0' 33'66' 2034 No-Build LOS (Delay)D (44.8)C (31.0)B (19.0)B (12.7)B (19.9)Synchro 95th Q 52'#342'#344'51'20' 450' 43' 186'214' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)D (49.2)D (35.9)C (20.2)B (14.1)C (22.3)Synchro 95th Q 65'#449'#462'64'20' 508' 119' 210'233' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay)D (40.1)C (33.1)C (23.0)B (20.0)C (24.6)Synchro 95th Q 45'#305'#311'49'16' #405' 22' #195'201' # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity; queue may be longer Based on the results presented in Table 3, the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road and Edgefield Road is expected to operate at LOS C in the 2034 Build conditions. The westbound and eastbound approaches experience additional delay from the proposed development traffic volumes. Signal timing updates are recommended to adjust to the anticipated traffic volumes from the Kellogg Tract. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 110 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 23 October 2024 4.2 Edgefield Road at Georgia Avenue The capacity analysis results at the signalized intersection of Edgefield Road at Georgia Avenue are summarized in Table 4. Table 4 – Edgefield Road at Georgia Avenue Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (Georgia Avenue)WB (Chalet North Boulevard)NB (Edgefield Road)SB (Edgefield Road)IntersectionEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)C (34.8)D (47.9)A (9.6)A (8.7)B (15.1)Synchro 95th Q115'29'6'52'0'105'18' 133' 21' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)D (35.2)D (48.8)B (11.1)B (10.4)B (16.3)Synchro 95th Q141'32'6'61'0'136'24' 182' 23' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)D (35.3)D (49.3)B (11.8)B (11.2)B (16.8)Synchro 95th Q155'32'6'61'0'149'24' 207' 24' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)D (35.2)D (41.8)B (14.8)B (10.3)B (17.2)Synchro 95th Q143'41'51'57'13'318'43' 177' 20' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)D (35.8)D (42.5)C (20.1)B (12.9)C (20.4)Synchro 95th Q#404'49'59'65'16'437'#88' 236' 23' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)D (37.1)D (43.6)C (23.6)B (14.1)C (22.6)Synchro 95th Q#459'49'59'65'16'#495'#100' 261' 24' # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity; queue may be longer Based on the capacity analysis results presented in Table 4, the intersection operates at LOS C or better under the 2024 Existing and 2034 No-Build conditions. With the addition of project trips associated with the proposed development, the intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS B during the AM peak hour and LOS C during the PM peak hour conditions. No mitigation is recommended at this intersection. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 111 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 24 October 2024 4.3 Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 The capacity analysis results at the unsignalized intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 are summarized in Table 5. Site Access is proposed to be constructed with one ingress lane and two egress lanes. This driveway is proposed to construct the southbound approach to the intersection. The southbound approach is recommended to be constructed with a dedicated left turn lane with 200 feet of storage with appropriate taper and a shared through-right lane. The intersection is proposed to be placed under signalized control when warranted. Table 5 – Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #1 Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (Belvedere Clearwater Road)WB (Belvedere Clearwater Road)NB (Ridgefield Drive)SB (Site Access #2)IntersectionEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)A (0.0)A (9.0)*B (12.1)--Synchro 95th Q-0'0'0'0'-3'-5'- 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)A (0.0)A (9.3)*B (13.0)--Synchro 95th Q-0'0'0'0'-5'-8'- 2034 Build LOS (Delay)A (10.8)*A (9.3)*C (24.2)F ($)-Synchro 95th Q8'0'0'0'0'0'18'5' 803'23' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay) B (13.5)B (12.9)C (24.4)B (15.3)B (13.9)Synchro 95th Q46'156'0'13'168'33'24'4' 151'29' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)A (0.0)A (9.2)*B (13.0)--Synchro 95th Q-0'0'3'0'-3'-3'- 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)A (0.0)A (9.7)*B (14.3)--Synchro 95th Q-0'0'5'0'-3'-3'- 2034 Build LOS (Delay)B (13.2)*A (9.6)*E (48.2)F ($)-Synchro 95th Q20'0'0'5'0'0'20'3' 798'25' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay)B (11.6)B (10.9)C (27.8)C (21.6)B (12.9)Synchro 95th Q80'139'0'25'157'39'19'0' #188'28' *Major street left turn delay ($) delay exceeds 300 s # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity;queue may be longer Based on the results presented in Table 5, the Site Access is expected to fail as an unsignalized intersection. When signalized, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS B during the AM and PM peak hour conditions. Each approach is expected to operate at LOS C or better. Turn lane warrants showed a right-turn lane for the westbound approach is warranted, therefore a westbound right-turn lane with 300 feet of storage and appropriate taper is recommended to facilitate entry to the site. Turn lane warrant worksheets are shown in Appendix G. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 112 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 25 October 2024 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Based on Part 4 of the MUTCD, a partial signal warrant analysis was conducted for the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 to determine if a traffic signal would be warranted. Signal warrant 3 was evaluated based on the available 4 hours of count data grown to the 2034 Build year and projected trips. The results of the signal warrant analysis are summarized in Table 20 and are included in Appendix F. The analysis results indicate that the applicable criteria are met for MUTCD Warrant 3. It is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the MUTCD once the proposed development is constructed and occupied. A signal is recommended to be constructed when warranted at this intersection. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 113 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 26 October 2024 4.4 Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Westbound Ramps The capacity analysis results at the signalized intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Westbound Ramps are summarized in Table 6. Table 6 – Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Westbound Ramps Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (Belvedere Clearwater Road)WB (Belvedere Clearwater Road)SB (I 520 WB Off Ramp)IntersectionEBTEBRWBLWBTSBLSBTSBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)A (7.1)A (6.7)D (40.5)B (11.3)Synchro 95th Q 63'0'0'87'87'0' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)A (7.5)B (12.3)D (41.6)B (14.1)Synchro 95th Q 96'11'20'107' 108'0' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)A (8.2)B (13.9)D (42.2)B (14.9)Synchro 95th Q 136'40'39'109' 109'25' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay)A (8.1)A (1.2)D (42.8)A (9.3)Synchro 95th Q 127'68'46'110' 110'25' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)A (8.5)A (4.8)D (38.8)B (14.7)Synchro 95th Q 74'37'149'146' 147'11' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)B (10.6)B (11.1)D (37.0)B (17.4)Synchro 95th Q 115'm55'205'191' 191'25' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)B (11.6)C (20.2)D (37.2)C (20.8)Synchro 95th Q 153'm51'297'191' 191'78' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay)B (11.5)A (1.1)D (37.4)B (13.2)Synchro 95th Q 150'm75'388'193' 193'79' m – Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal Based on the results presented in Table 6, the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at I- 520 westbound ramps is anticipated to operate at LOS C or better for all analyzed conditions. The intersection is part of a coordinated signal system. It is recommended to update the signal timings to accommodate the proposed traffic volumes associated with the Kellogg Tract Development. Optimized signal timings are expected to provide an LOS of B for AM and PM peak hour conditions in the 2034 Build scenario. As a recommendation from the Alidade Section 1A TIA (Kimley-Horn, June 2024), a signal was recommended at the downstream intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Cherokee Drive/Buchanan Parkway, therefore optimizing the signal timings for the coordinated signal system is recommended. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 114 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 27 October 2024 4.5 Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Eastbound Ramps The capacity analysis results at the signalized intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Eastbound Ramps are shown in Table 7. Table 7 – Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Eastbound Ramps Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (Belvedere Clearwater Road)WB (Belvedere Clearwater Road)NB (I 520 EB Off Ramp)IntersectionEBLEBTWBTWBRNBLNBTNBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)A (7.5)A (7.5)D (43.3)A (8.6)Synchro 95th Q51'46'83'33'61'0' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)A (7.5)A (8.7)D (43.4)A (9.2)Synchro 95th Q53'54'122'44'72'4' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)A (8.8)B (10.4)D (47.8)B (11.8)Synchro 95th Q61'70'158'52'129'12' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay)A (8.9)A (0.8)D (47.5) A (6.4)Synchro 95th Q64'98'120'21'128'12' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)A (5.9)A (7.9)D (47.4)B (10.3)Synchro 95th Q29'206'75'31'133'32' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)A (6.9)A (9.3)D (51.2)B (11.3)Synchro 95th Q37'348'109'44'160'70' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)A (9.8)B (12.6)F (124.7)C (24.9)Synchro 95th Q49'474'151'49'#310'86' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay)B (12.1)A (1.4)D (43.7) B (11.6)Synchro 95th Q44'324'121'22'252'75' # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity; queue may be longer Based on the results presented in Table 7, the intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS C or better for AM and PM peak hour conditions in the 2034 Build scenario. Due to trips generated by the proposed development, the I-520 eastbound off ramp is expected to worsen to a LOS F. Signal timing updates for the coordinated signal system are recommended to accommodate the new traffic volumes for the Kellogg Tract Development. Optimized timings are anticipated to improve the intersection to an LOA A during the AM peak hour and LOS B during the PM peak hour, respectively. As a recommendation from the Alidade Section 1A TIA (Kimley-Horn, June 2024), a signal was recommended at the downstream intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Cherokee Drive/Buchanan Parkway, therefore optimizing the signal timings for the coordinated signal system is recommended. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 115 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 28 October 2024 4.6 Belvedere Clearwater Road at Cherokee Drive/Buchanan Parkway The capacity analysis results at the unsignalized intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Buchanan Parkway are summarized in Table 8. Table 8 – Belvedere Clearwater Road at Buchanan Parkway Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (Belvedere Clearwater Road)WB (Belvedere Clearwater Road)NB (Cherokee Drive)SB (Buchanan Parkway)IntersectionEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)B (10.9)*A (8.8)*F (197.5)E (36.2)-Synchro 95th Q15'0'3'0'178'58'23' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)B (12.7)*A (9.1)*F ($)F ($)-Synchro 95th Q25'0'0'3'0'0'353'273'63' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)B (13.8)*A (9.5)*F ($)F ($)-Synchro 95th Q35'0'0'3'0'0'418'328'90' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay)A (3.2)A (8.5)D (40.3)D (46.5)B (13.4)Synchro 95th Q#205’7'0'14'197'0'107'97'166' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)A (9.1)*B (10.5)*F (85.6)C (17.7)-Synchro 95th Q0'0'0'3'0'0'115'3'0' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)B (10.4)*B (11.9)*F ($)F (221.9)-Synchro 95th Q13'0'0'5'0'0'423'95'10' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)B (11.5)*B (12.4)*F ($)F (221.9)-Synchro 95th Q20'0'0'5'0'0'423'148'23' 2034 Build-Improved LOS (Delay)A (1.8)A (7.8)D (35.9)C (32.3)A (7.5)Synchro 95th Q14'41'0'20'158'0'105'54'44' *Major street left turn delay ($) Delay greater than 300 s Based on the results presented in Table 8, the northbound and southbound approaches are expected fail for AM and PM peak hour conditions. Based on the Alidade Section 1A TIA (Kimley- Horn, June 2024), a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the MUTCD is recommended once the proposed Alidade Section 1A Development is constructed and occupied. A signal is recommended to be constructed when warranted at this intersection. When signalized, the intersection is expected to have an LOS B and LOS A for the AM and PM peak hour conditions, respectively. Additionally, the northbound and southbound approaches are anticipated to improve to an LOS D, or better, during AM and PM peak hour conditions. The proposed traffic signal at this interseciton is not recommended mitigation for the Kellogg Tract Development. However, it is recommended to optimize and coordinate traffic signal timings for this intersection once the Kellogg Tract Development is completed. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 116 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 29 October 2024 4.7 Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road The capacity analysis results for the unsignalized intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road are summarized in Table 9. Table 9 – Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (Belvedere Clearwater Road)WB (Belvedere Clearwater Road)SB (Old Sudlow Lake Road) EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)A (9.8)*A (0.0)C (20.2) Synchro 95th Q13'0'0'105' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)B (10.9)*A (0.0)F (83.3) Synchro 95th Q20'0'0'393' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)B (11.5)*A (0.0)F (112.7) Synchro 95th Q25'0'0'473' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay) B (11.5)*A (0.0)E (35.7) Synchro 95th Q 25’0’0' 30’223’ PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)A (9.8)*A (0.0)B (14.2) Synchro 95th Q20'0'0'30' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)B (12.5)*A (0.0)D (32.2) Synchro 95th Q48'0'0'123' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)B (14.0)*A (0.0)F (50.2) Synchro 95th Q60'0'0'193' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay)B (14.0)*A (0.0)C (22.0) Synchro 95th Q 60’0’0'40’60’ *Major street left turn delay Based on the capacity analysis results presented in Table 9, the southbound approach is expected to operate at an LOS of F and LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. As part of the Alidade Section 1A TIA (Kimley-Horn, June 2024), a southbound right turn lane with 250 feet of storage and appropriate taper was recommended for mitigation. With this improvement, the 2034 Build scenario LOS is anticipated to improve to LOS E and LOS C during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Therefore, no further mitigation is recommended. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 117 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 30 October 2024 4.8 Edgefield Road at Hampton Avenue The capacity analysis results at the unsignalized intersection of Edgefield Road at Hampton Avenue are summarized in Table 10. Table 10 – Edgefield Road at Hampton Avenue Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure WB (Hampton Avenue)NB (Edgefield Road)SB (Edgefield Road) WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)B (12.0)A (0.0)A (9.5)* Synchro 95th Q 5'0'3'0' 2034 No-Build LOS (Delay)B (13.5)A (0.0)A (10.4)* Synchro 95th Q 5'0'3'0' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)B (13.9)A (0.0)A (10.7)* Synchro 95th Q 8'0'3'0' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)B (12.9)A (0.0)A (10.3)* Synchro 95th Q 3'0'3'0' 2034 No-Build LOS (Delay)B (14.7)A (0.0)A (11.7)* Synchro 95th Q 3'0'3'0' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)C (15.3)A (0.0)A (12.4)* Synchro 95th Q 5'0'5'0' *Major street left turn delay Based on the capacity analysis results presented in Table 10, the intersection is expected to provide an LOS of C or better for each approach during the AM and PM peak hour conditions evaluated in the 2034 Build scenario. No mitigation is recommended at this intersection. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 118 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 31 October 2024 4.9 Edgefield Road at Celeste Avenue The capacity analysis results at the unsignalized intersection of Edgefield Road at Celeste Avenue are summarized in Table 11. Table 11 – Edgefield Road at Celeste Avenue Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (Celeste Avenue)NB (Edgefield Road)SB (Edgefield Road) EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)C (17.3)B (10.1)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q 35'15'0'0' 2034 No-Build LOS (Delay)D (25.8)B (11.6)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q 68'23'0'0' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)D (30.5)B (12.0)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q 83'25'0'0' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)C (15.6)B (10.1)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q 18'8'0'0' 2034 No-Build LOS (Delay)C (20.2)B (11.3)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q 30'13'0'0' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)C (24.4)B (11.6)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q 40'13'0'0' *Major street left turn delay Based on the capacity analysis results presented in Table 11, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS of A for the major street approaches. For the minor street approach, an LOS D and LOS C is anticipated for the AM and PM peak hour conditions, respectively. The 2034 Build conditions maintain the same grade LOS as the 2034 No-Build conditions; therefore, no mitigation is recommended at this intersection. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 119 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 32 October 2024 4.10 Edgefield Road at Johnson Road The capacity analysis results at the unsignalized intersection of Edgefield Road at Johnson Road are summarized in Table 12. Table 12 – Edgefield Road at Johnson Road Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (Johnson Road)WB (Johnson Road)NB (Edgefield Road)SB (Edgefield Road) EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)C (15.1)C (23.3)A (9.1)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q 5'3'0'0'0'0' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)C (20.1)D (34.1)A (9.8)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q10'3'0'0'0'0' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)D (26.2)E (39.7)B (10.1)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q18'5'0'0'0'0' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)C (15.9)B (11.3)A (9.5)*A (9.6)* Synchro 95th Q 8'3'0'0'0'0' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)C (21.4)B (12.4)B (10.3)*B (10.6)* Synchro 95th Q15'0'5'0'0'0' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)E (41.3)B (13.1)B (10.6)*B (11.2)* Synchro 95th Q38'0'5'0'0'0' *Major street left turn delay Based on the capacity analysis results presented in Table 12, the major approaches are expected operate at a LOS of B or better for each of the peak hour conditions evaluated. In the 2034 Build scenario, the eastbound approach is expected to operate at LOS D and LOS E during the AM and PM hour conditions, respectively. The westbound approach is expected to operate at LOS E and LOS B during the AM and PM hour conditions, respectively. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Based on Part 4 of the MUTCD, a partial signal warrant analysis was conducted for the intersection of Edgefield Road at Johnson Road to determine if a traffic signal would be warranted. Warrant 3 was evaluated based on the available 4 hours of count data grown to the 2034 Build year and projected trips. The results of the signal warrant analysis are summarized in Table 20 and are included in Appendix F. The analysis results presented in Table 20 indicate that the applicable criteria are not met for MUTCD Warrant 3. A signal is not recommended at this intersection. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 120 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 33 October 2024 4.11 Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector The capacity analysis results at the signalized intersection of Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector are summarized in Table 13. Table 13 – Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (Driveway)WB (US 25 Connector)NB (Edgefield Road)SB (Edgefield Road)IntersectionEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)F (91.3)B (12.4)E (63.7)A (0.1)C (21.2)Synchro 95th Q7'0'41'22'0'198'160'61' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)F (91.3)B (13.0)F (99.4)A (0.2)C (33.1)Synchro 95th Q7'0'50'23'0'264'#497'71' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)F (91.3)B (17.9)F (243.3)A (0.2)F (90.7)Synchro 95th Q7'0'98'21'0'#485'#499'78' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay)F (91.3)C (27.7)D (38.0)B (12.1) C (23.9)Synchro 95th Q7'0'98'36'0'303'#518'199' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)E (68.8)B (15.4)E (72.9)A (0.2)C (29.1)Synchro 95th Q15'7'45'75'8'280'137'70' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)E (68.3)B (16.9)F (128.9)A (0.2)D (49.2)Synchro 95th Q18'7'60'127' 8'370'165'84' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)E (68.3)C (21.5)F (235.6)A (0.5)F (91.0)Synchro 95th Q18'7'156'103' 9'#633'164'98' 2034 Build-Improved LOS (Delay)E (68.3)C (35.1)D (40.0)A (4.6) C (24.5)Synchro 95th Q18'7'156'225' 7'406'157'194' # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity; queue may be longer Based on the capacity analysis results presented in Table 13, the signalized intersection is expected to operate at an LOS F during the AM and PM peak hour conditions evaluated for the 2034 Build scenario. Updates to the signal timings are recommended for this intersection and the upstream signal which operates as a coordinated system. Timings accommodating the new traffic patterns are expected to provide intersection LOS C for both AM and PM peak hour conditions. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 121 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 34 October 2024 4.12 US 25 Connector at I-520 Westbound Ramps The capacity analysis results at the signalized intersection of US 25 Connector at I-520 Westbound Ramps are summarized in Table 14. Table 14 – US 25 Connector at I-520 Westbound Ramps Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (US 25 Connector)WB (US 25 Connector)NB (I 520 WB Ramps)IntersectionEBTEBRWBLWBTNBLNBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)B (13.3)A (3.0)D (37.3)A (9.2)Synchro 95th Q4'19'1'30'20'6' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)B (14.2)A (3.1)D (37.7)A (9.8)Synchro 95th Q6'38'1'37'25'6' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)B (14.4)A (3.1)D (41.7)B (11.0)Synchro 95th Q20'40'1'40'50'6' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay)B (19.1)A (4.7)C (34.6)B (14.1)Synchro 95th Q24'46'2'53'47'5' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)B (10.5)A (3.3)D (38.4)A (6.4)Synchro 95th Q5'32'1'57'28'4' 2034 No- Build LOS (Delay)B (11.5)A (3.6)D (39.4)A (7.0)Synchro 95th Q6'35'1'73'36'4' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)B (11.5)A (3.6)D (47.6)A (8.8)Synchro 95th Q19'36'1'78'82'4' 2034 Build-Improved LOS (Delay)B (18.1)A (6.3)C (34.3)B (12.1)Synchro 95th Q25'46'2'113'75'3' Based on the capacity analysis results presented in Table 14, the signalized intersection is expected to operate at LOS of B or better during the AM and PM peak hour conditions evaluated. Proposed development traffic contributes to a worsening LOS for the northbound approach in 2034 Build AM peak hour conditions. Signal timing updates are recommended at this intersection to better facilitate the northbound approach of the I-520 westbound ramps. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 122 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 35 October 2024 4.13 US 25 Connector at I-520 Eastbound Ramps The capacity analysis results at the unsignalized intersection of US 25 Connector at I-520 Eastbound Ramps are summarized in Table 15. Table 15 – US 25 Connector at I-520 Eastbound Ramps Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (US 25 Connector)NB (I 520 EB Ramps) EBT EBR NBL NBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)A (0.0)B (10.6) Synchro 95th Q 0'40'0' 2034 No-Build LOS (Delay)A (0.0)B (11.1) Synchro 95th Q 0'50'0' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)A (0.0)B (11.3) Synchro 95th Q 0'55'0' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)A (0.0)B (14.1) Synchro 95th Q 0'110'0' 2034 No-Build LOS (Delay)A (0.0)C (18.7) Synchro 95th Q 0'188'0' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)A (0.0)C (21.3) Synchro 95th Q 0'225'0' Based on the capacity analysis results presented in Table 15, the analyzed approaches are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better for each approach during the AM and PM peak hour conditions evaluated. No mitigation is recommended at this intersection. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 123 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 36 October 2024 4.14 Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road The capacity analysis results at the signalized intersection of Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road are summarized in Table 16. Table 16 – Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure WB (Ascauga Lake Road)NB (Edgefield Road)SB (Edgefield Road)IntersectionWBLWBRNBTNBRSBLSBT AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)C (28.8)D (36.3)B (14.6)C (25.1)Synchro 95th Q251'176'92'226'132' 2034 No-Build LOS (Delay)C (29.0)D (40.8)B (17.6)C (27.9)Synchro 95th Q294'223'145'#313'183' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)C (29.3)D (45.1)B (17.6)C (29.8)Synchro 95th Q297'221'257'#313'209' 2034 Build-Improved LOS (Delay)C (33.8)D (38.0)B (18.7)C (28.9)Synchro 95th Q322'230'445'265'179' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)C (30.7)D (43.2)B (14.1)C (29.0)Synchro 95th Q277'253'#388'#397'211' 2034 No-Build LOS (Delay)C (31.0)E (64.4)B (16.9)D (38.6)Synchro 95th Q261'259'238'#687'168' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)C (31.4)F (84.8)B (16.8)D (46.7)Synchro 95th Q277'253'#401'#687'212' 2034 Build-Improved LOS (Delay)D (41.5)D (38.9)C (20.3)C (31.8)Synchro 95th Q#321'268'581'#687'166' # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity; queue may be longer Based on the capacity analysis results presented in Table 16, the signalized intersection is expected to provide an LOS of D or better for the peak hour conditions evaluated. The westbound and southbound approaches are each expected to operate with a LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours. The northbound approach is expected to operate at an LOS D during the AM peak hour and LOS F during the PM peak hour in the 2034 Build conditions. The PM peak hour worsens from LOS D to LOS F with the proposed development traffic. Signal timing updates to accommodate the proposed Kellogg Tract Development volumes are recommended with consideration to the downstream intersection which operates as a coordinated system. With appropriate signal timings, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS C for both AM and PM peak hour conditions. The northbound approach is also anticipated to improve to LOS D during the PM peak hour. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 124 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 37 October 2024 4.15 Edgefield Road at Clearmont Road The capacity analysis results at the unsignalized intersection of Edgefield Road at Clearmont Road are summarized in Table 17. Table 17 – Edgefield Road at Clearmont Road Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (Clearmont Drive)WB (Driveway)NB (Edgefield Road)SB (Edgefield Road) EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR AM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)C (20.9)A (0.0)A (9.2)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q8'0'0'0'0'0' 2034 No-Build LOS (Delay)D (32.8)A (0.0)A (9.9)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q30'0'3'0'0'0' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)F (60.0)A (0.0)B (10.6)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q55'0'3'0'0'0' PM Peak Hour 2024 Existing LOS (Delay)D (25.8)D (34.1)A (9.3)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q8'3'0'0'0'0' 2034 No-Build LOS (Delay)E (46.3)F (59.7)B (10.2)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q33'5'3'0'0'0' 2034 Build LOS (Delay)F (127.0)F (129.4)B (11.9)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q80'10'5'0'0'0' *Major street left turn delay Based on the capacity analysis results presented in Table 17, the major approaches are expected to operate at LOS B or better for each of the peak hour conditions evaluated. The westbound approach is expected to operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour in the 2034 Build condition. The eastbound approach is expected to operate at LOS E and LOS F during the AM and PM peak hour conditions, respectively. However, these approaches are low volume, and a poor LOS can be common when accessing the major road. The approach traffic volumes are not enough to warrant a signal at this intersection. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Based on Part 4 of the MUTCD, a signal warrant analysis was conducted for the intersection of Edgefield Road at Clearmont Road to determine if a traffic signal would be warranted. Warrant 3 was evaluated based on the available 4 hours of count data grown to the 2034 Build year and projected trips. The results of the signal warrant analysis are summarized in Table 20 and are included in Appendix F. The analysis results presented in Table 20 indicate that the applicable criteria are not met for MUTCD Warrant 3. A signal is not recommended at this intersection. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 125 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 38 October 2024 4.16 Buchanan Parkway at Site Access #3 The capacity analysis results at the unsignalized intersection of Buchanan Parkway Road at Site Access #3 are summarized in Table 18. Site Access is proposed to be constructed with one ingress lane and one egress lane. This driveway is proposed to construct the eastbound approach and is proposed to be full-movement and placed under stop control. Table 18 – Buchanan Parkway at Site Access #3 Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure EB (Site Access #3)WB (Buchanan Parkway)NB (Buchanan Parkway)SB (Buchanan Parkway) EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR AM Peak Hour 2034 Build LOS (Delay)B (10.3)A (0.0)A (8.0)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q5'0'3'0' PM Peak Hour 2034 Build LOS (Delay)A (9.1)A (0.0)A (7.6)*A (0.0) Synchro 95th Q3'0'3'0' *Major street left turn delay Based on the capacity analysis results presented in Table 18, the intersection is expected to provide an LOS of B or better for each of the peak hour conditions evaluated. No mitigation is recommended at this intersection. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 126 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 39 October 2024 4.17 Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 The capacity analysis results at the proposed intersection of Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 are summarized in Table 19. Site Access is proposed to be constructed with one ingress lane and two egress lanes. This driveway is proposed to construct the westbound approach to the intersection. The westbound approach is proposed to consist of a dedicated right-turn lane with 150 feet of storage with appropriate taper and a shared through-left lane and placed under signalized control when warranted. Table 19 – Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 Capacity Analysis Results Condition Measure WB (Site Access #1)NB (Edgefield Road)SB (Edgefield Road)IntersectionWBLWBRNBTNBRSBLSBT AM Peak Hour 2034 Build LOS (Delay)C (20.4)A (0.0)B (11.0)*-Synchro 95th Q40'78'0'20'0' 2034 Build- Improved LOS (Delay)C (21.7)B (15.5)A (8.3)B (13.2)Synchro 95th Q72’61’184’26’47’117’ PM Peak Hour 2034 Build LOS (Delay)F (63.2)A (0.0)C (22.0)*-Synchro 95th Q135'108'0'108'0' 2034 Build-Improved LOS (Delay)C (32.2)B (20.1)B (10.3)B (17.2)Synchro 95th Q78’64’344’45’#198’ 128’ # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity; queue may be longer Based on the capacity analysis results presented in Table 19, the site access is expected to have an LOS F during the PM peak hour condition while remaining unsignalized. A signalized intersection is expected to provide an LOS of C or better for each of the peak hour conditions evaluated. A signal is recommended to accommodate the project trips generated by the proposed development. Turn lane warrants analyses showed a right-turn lane for the northbound approach is warranted. A right-turn lane with 150 feet of storage and appropriate taper is recommended to facilitate entry to the site. Turn lane warrant worksheets are shown in Appendix G. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Based on Part 4 of the MUTCD, a partial signal warrant analysis was conducted for the intersection of Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 to determine if a traffic signal would be warranted. Warrant 3 was evaluated based on the available 4 hours of count data grown to the 2034 Build year and projected trips. The results of the signal warrant analysis are summarized in Table 20 and are included in Appendix F. The analysis results indicate that the applicable criteria are met for MUTCD Warrant 3. It is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the MUTCD once the proposed development is constructed and occupied. A signal is recommended to be constructed when warranted at this intersection. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 127 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 40 October 2024 4.18 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Based on Part 4 of the MUTCD, a partial signal warrant analysis was conducted for the following intersections: - Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 - Edgefield Road at Johnson Road - Edgefield Road at Clearmont Road - Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 The volumes used in this analysis considered the background growth, projected project trips, and approved development volumes. The results of the signal warrant analysis are summarized in Table 20 and are included in Appendix F. Table 20 – Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Results MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant Intersection Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/ Site Access #2 Edgefield Road at Johnson Road Edgefield Road at Clearmont Drive Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 Warrant 3 (Peak Hour Volume)Satisfied(1/1)Not Satisfied (0/1) Not Satisfied (0/1) Satisfied(1/1) Warrant 3 was analyzed based on the available 4 hours of count data and the projected trip generation for the proposed development. Based on the traffic signal warrant analysis results presented in Table 20, signalized control is warranted in the 2034 Build condition at both site accesses evaluated. Signalized control is not recommended for the intersections of Edgefield Road at Johnson Road and Edgefield Road at Clearmont Drive as the peak hour warrants were not met. It is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis for the intersections of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 and Edgefield Road at Site Access #1per the MUTCD once the proposed development is constructed and occupied. A signal is recommended to be constructed at Site Access #1 and Site Access #2 if warranted. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 128 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 41 October 2024 5 Conclusion This report summarizes the traffic impact of the proposed Kellogg Tract Development in North Augusta, South Carolina. The proposed development is expected to be constructed and occupied by 2034. It is our understanding that Cranston Engineeringis assisting in the engineering and development of 1,213 lots for single family detached housing, 55 lots for single family attached housing, a gas station (4 KSF), a day care (15 KSF), office space (30 KSF), strip retail (25 KSF), and restaurant space (15 KSF). Access to the site is planned via Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive, along Edgefield Road between Johnson Road and Whatley Street, and along Buchanan Parkway. This traffic impact analysis (TIA) evaluates traffic operations under 2024 Existing, 2034 No-Build, 2034 Build, and 2034 Build-Improved conditions during the AM and PM peak hours at the following study intersections: Belvedere Clearwater Road at Edgefield Road Edgefield Road at Georgia Avenue Belvedere Clearwater Road Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 WB Ramps Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 EB Ramps Belvedere Clearwater Road at Buchanan Parkway Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road Edgefield Road at Hampton Avenue Edgefield Road at Celeste Avenue Edgefield Road at Johnson Road Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector US 25 Connector at I-520 WB Ramps US 25 Connector at I-520 EB Ramps Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road Edgefield Road at Clearmont Road Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 Buchanan Parkway at Site Access #3 The following improvements are proposed to accommodate the 2034 Build traffic conditions due to the impact of the site: Belvedere Clearwater Road at Edgefield Road Signal timing updates are recommended to accommodate the new traffic patterns. Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 Site access is recommended to be constructed as the southbound approach to the ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 129 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 42 October 2024 intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive. The access should consist of one ingress and two egress lanes. The egress should consist of a dedicated left turn lane with 200 feet of storage with appropriate taper and a shared through-right. It is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) once the proposed development is constructed and occupied. It is recommended to convert to a signalized intersection when warranted. It is recommended to construct a 300-foot westbound right-turn lane with appropriate taper. Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Westbound Ramps Signal timing adjustments are recommended to accommodate new traffic patterns and to operate in coordination with the existing signal at the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Eastbound Ramps and the recommended signal at the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Buchanan Parkway. Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Eastbound Ramps Signal timing adjustments are recommended to accommodate new traffic patterns and to operate in coordination with the existing signal at the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at I-520 Westbound Ramps and the recommended signal at the intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Buchanan Parkway. Belvedere Clearwater Road at Cherokee Drive/Buchanan Parkway This intersection is proposed to be signalized per the Alidade Section 1A TIA (Kimley- Horn, June 2024). o The signal timings from this intersection should be coordinated and optimized with the inclusion of the proposed Kellogg Tract Development Volumes Belvedere Clearwater Road at Old Sudlow Lake Road As part of the Alidade Section 1A TIA (Kimley-Horn, June 2024), an additional southbound right turn lane with 250 feet of storage and appropriate taper was recommended for mitigation. With this improvement, no further mitigation is recommended at this intersection. Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector Adjust timings operating in coordination with the existing signal at the intersection of Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector at I-520 Westbound Ramps Adjust timings to improve operations of the intersection based on new traffic patterns. Edgefield Road at Ascauga Lake Road Adjust timings operating in coordination with the existing signal at the intersection of ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 130 of 198 Kellogg Tract Development Traffic Impact Analysis 43 October 2024 Edgefield Road at US 25 Connector Buchanan Parkway at Site Access #3 Site access is recommended to be constructed with one ingress lane and one full movement egress lane as the eastbound approach to the existing intersection of Buchanan Parkway and Highland Springs Middle School Access. Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 Site access is recommended to be constructed as the westbound approach to the proposed intersection of Edgefield Road at Site Access #1. The approach is recommended to consist of one ingress lane and two egress lanes. The egress should consist of a shared through-left lane and a dedicated right turn lane with 150 feet of storage. It is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the MUTCD once the proposed development is constructed and occupied. It is recommended to convert to a signalized intersection when warranted. It is recommended to construct a 150-foot northbound right-turn lane with appropriate taper. The 2034 Build recommended geometry and traffic control is illustrated in Figure 10. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 131 of 198 Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorthBoulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e ld Dr i v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I- 5 2 0 W B O f f I- 5 2 0 W B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d BuchananParkway HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue Johnson Road JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga LakeRoad US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I- 5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue Kellogg Tract Development Figure 10 -Recommended Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control TWLT TW L T TW L T TW L T TW L T TW L T TW L T Driveway Driveway Sit e Ac c e ss #2 Project Site Project Site SiteAccess#3 SiteAccess#1 Legend Existing Laneage Recommended Laneage Existing Signal Recommended Signal Existing Stop Control Recommended Stop Control S = 300' S = 1 0 0 ' S = 150' S= 2 0 0 ' S= 2 5 0 ' Signal to be installed per the AlidadeSection1A TIA, this is not an improvementfor the Kelogg Tract Development ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 132 of 198 AT T A C H M E N T #9 - P& D ST A F F RE P O R T Pa g e 13 3 of 19 8 Page 2 kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Table 1: Kellogg Tract - Phase 1 Trip Generation Land Use Intensity Units Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 201 DU 1,918 141 37104192 12171 215 - Single-Family Attached Housing 55 DU 369 23 7 16 29 17 12 Subtotal 2,287 164 44120221 13883 Internal Capture 00 0 0000 Pass-By 00 0 0000 Total Net New External Trips 2,287 164 44120221 13883 As shown in Table 1, Phase 1 of the Kellogg Tract is anticipated to generate 2,287 daily trips, 164 AM peak hour trips (44 in/120 out), and 221 PM peak hour trips (138 in/83 out). Phase 1 of the Kellogg Tract is only proposed to be accessed via Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgeland Drive/Site Access #2. Phase 2 of the Kellogg Tract Development is proposed to consist of: · 30,000 square feet of general office building · 25,000 square feet of strip retail plaza · 4,000 square feet of convenience store/gas station (9-15 fueling positions) · 15,000 square feet of high-turnover sit-down restaurant space · 545 DU single family detached · 15,000 square feet of daycare space Table 2 on the following page shows the anticipated trip generation of Phase 2 of the Kellogg Tract Development. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 134 of 198 Page 3 kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Table 2: Kellogg Tract - Phase 2 Trip Generation Land Use Intensity Units Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out 710 - General Office Building 30.0 KSF 40759527611051 822 - Strip Retail Plaza (<40k)25.0 KSF 1,2855332211497574 945 - Convenience Store/Gas Station (9-15 Fueling Positions) 4.0 KSF 2,792 226 113 113218 109 109 932 - High-Turnover (Sit- Down) Restaurant 15.0 KSF 1,60814479651368353 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 545 DU 4,802349 91 258489 308 181 565 - Day Care Center 15.0 KSF 71416587781677889 Subtotal 11,608 996 454 542 1,220 663 557 Internal Capture 2,3221346767246 123 123 ITE Pass-By 2,8651447272220 110 110 Total Net New External Trips 6,421 718 315 403754 430 324 As shown in Table 2, Phase 2 of the Kellogg Tract is anticipated to generate 6,421 daily trips, 718 AM peak hour trips (315 in/403 out), and 754 PM peak hour trips (430 in /324 out). This memo analyzes two access scenarios for Phase 2 of the Kellogg Tract: · Phase 2, Scenario A: The site is only accessed via Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgeland Drive/Site Access #2. · Phase 2, Scenario B: The site is access via both Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgeland Drive/Site Access #2 and Edgefield Road at Site Access #1. Phase 3 of the Kellogg Tract Development is proposed to consist of: · 362 DU single family detached Table 3 on the following page shows the anticipated trip generation of Phase 3 of the Kellogg Tract Development. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 135 of 198 Page 4 kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Table 3: Kellogg Tract - Phase 3 Trip Generation Land Use Intensity Units Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Residential Land Uses 3,295 240 62178 333 210123 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 362 DU 3,295 240 62 178 333 210123 Subtotal 3,295 240 62178 333 210123 Internal Capture 00 0 0000 Pass-By 00 0 0000 Total Net New External Trips 3,295 240 62178 333 210123 As shown in Table 3, Phase 3 of the Kellogg Tract is anticipated to generate 3,295 daily trips, 240 AM peak hour trips (62 in/178 out), and 333 PM peak hour trips (210 in /123 out). Access for Phase 3 of the Kellogg Tract is proposed via: · Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgeland Drive/Site Access #2. · Edgefield Road at Site Access #1. Phase 4 of the Kellogg Tract Development is proposed to consist of: · 105 DU single family detached Table 4 on the following page shows the anticipated trip generation of Phase 4 of the Kellogg Tract Development. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 136 of 198 Page 5 kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Table 4: Kellogg Tract - Phase 4 Trip Generation Land Use Intensity Units Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Residential Land Uses 1,055 78 20 58 104 6638 210 - Single-Family Detached Housing 105 DU 1,055 78 20 58 104 6638 Subtotal 1,055 78 20 58 104 6638 Internal Capture 00 0 000 0 Pass-By 00 0 000 0 Total Net New External Trips 1,055 78 20 58 104 6638 As shown in Table 4, Phase 4 of the Kellogg Tract is anticipated to generate 1,055 daily trips, 78 AM peak hour trips (20 in/58 out), and 104 PM peak hour trips (66 in /38 out). Access for Phase 4 of the Kellogg Tract is proposed via: · Buchanan Parkway at Site Access #3 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 137 of 198 Page 6 kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 CAPACITY ANALYSIS Capacity/level-of-service (LOS) analyses were conducted using Synchro Version 12 traffic analysis software, which utilizes the methodologies contained within the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM),6th Edition. Capacity analyses were conducted for the AM and PM peak hours of travel under 2026 Phase 1 Build, 2030 Phase 2 Build, and 2032 Phase 3 Build.Please note the 2034 Phase 4 build is not presented in this memorandum since it is the same volume and improvements as the 2034 Build Analysis in the Kellogg Tract TIA (Kimley-Horn, October 2024). Intersection LOS grades range from LOS A to LOS F, where the specific grades assigned to a given movement or approach are based on driver perception research and defined by the amount of control delay experienced by each vehicle. LOS A operations correspond with ideal, free-flow conditions where vehicles experience little to no delay, whereas LOS F operations are characterized by high vehicular delays and over-capacity conditions. Please note that it is not uncommon for unsignalized intersections to operate at LOS E or LOS F during peak hours of travel. Table 5 lists the LOS control delay thresholds published in the HCM for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Table 5 – HCM Level Of Service Criteria Level-of-Service Control Delay per Vehicle (sec/veh) Thresholds (HCM 6th Edition) Level-of-Service(LOS)Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections A ≤ 10 ≤ 10 B > 10 – 20 > 10 – 15 C > 20 – 35 > 15 – 25 D > 35 – 55 > 25 – 35 E > 55 – 80 > 35 – 50 F > 80 > 50 As part of the intersection analyses, SCDOT’s default Synchro parameters were utilized. Existing peak hour factors (PHFs) were utilized for the existing intersections and the PHFs for proposed intersections were assumed to be 0.9. Existing heavy vehicle percentages were utilized for all scenarios, with a minimum of 2% considered. The following sections outline the results of the capacity analysis for each of the study intersections. The capacity analysis worksheets are attached. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 138 of 198 Page 7 kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 The phased capacity analysis results at the currently unsignalized intersection of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 are summarized in Table 6. Site Access #2 is proposed to be constructed with one ingress lane and two egress lanes. This driveway is proposed to construct the southbound approach to and is proposed to be a dedicated left turn lane with 200 feet of storage with appropriate taper and a shared through-right lane. Based on the phase analysis results shown in Table 6 on the next page, the northbound and southbound approaches are anticipated to operate with short to moderate delays upon the completion of Phase 1 of the development. For Phase 1 of the development, a westbound right-turn lane with 300 feet of storage should be constructed. For Scenario A for Phase 2 of the development (access via Belvedere Clearwater Road only), the northbound and southbound approaches are anticipated to fail, with the southbound approach delays exceeding 300 seconds. If access is only provided via Belvedere Clearwater Road for Phase 2, a traffic signal should be considered for this phase. With a traffic signal in place for this access scenario, the intersection and all approaches are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better. For Scenario B for Phase 2 of the development (access via Belvedere Clearwater Road and Edgefield Road), the northbound approach is anticipated to operate with short delays however, the southbound approach (Site Access #2) is anticipated to fail. The southbound approach delays are anticipated to exceed 300 seconds. A traffic should be considered at this intersection for this access scenario. With a traffic signal in place for this access scenario, the intersection and all approaches are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better. For Phase 3 of the development (access via Belvedere Clearwater Road and Edgefield Road), the signalized intersection and approaches are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better. Please note, the results for the Phase 4 of the development are shown in the Kellogg Tract TIA (Kimley-Horn, October 2024). The phased improvements are listed below: Phase 1: · Construct the site access with one ingress lane and two egress lanes · Construct a westbound right-turn lane with 300’ of storage and an appropriate taper length Phase 2A and Phase 2B · A traffic signal is projected to be warranted during this phase of development · It is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the MUTCD once Phase 2 of the proposed development is constructed and occupied. A signal is recommended to be constructed when warranted at this intersection. Phase 3 and Phase 4 of the development are not anticipated to necessitate the need for further mitigation at this interseciton. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 139 of 198 Page 8 kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 EBLEBTEBR WBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBT SBR AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q3'0'0'0'0'0'5'55' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q30'0'0'0'0'0'5'980' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q135'125'0'10'134'29'0'#339' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q5'0'0'0'0'0'5'823' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q36'171'0'14'183'41'0'166' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q43'186'0'16'201'44'0'221' PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q8'0'0'3'0'0'3'53' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q73'0'0'3'0'0'3'883' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q#293'121'0'22'135'35'0'#240' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q15'0'0'3'0'0'3'755' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q68'144'0'27'161'44'0'143' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q87'148'0'27'166'45'0'#207' 2032 Build Phase 3 B (15.6)B (15.2)C (25.7)B (14.9)B (15.5)26'38' 2032 Build Phase 3 B (13.3)B (13.0)C (31.1)C (22.4)B (14.8)21'22' 2030 Build Phase 2A C (16.7)*A (9.3)*F (203.6)F ($) -45'68' 2030 Build Phase 2B B (11.9)*A (9.3)*D (30.8)F ($) -10'13' B (12.0)*A (9.0)*F (62.2)F ($) -43'78' 2030 Build Phase 2B** B (14.1)B (13.7)C (22.6)B (13.6)B (14.1)25'20' B (17.4)B (12.9)18'9' Condition Measure EB (Belvedere Clearwater Road)WB (Belvedere Clearwater Road)NB (Ridgefield Drive)SB (Site Access #2) 114' 2030 Build Phase 2A Table 6: Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 Capacity Analysis Results 2026 Build Phase 1 A (9.2)*A (8.9)*C (16.1)D (31.4) 8'8' 2030 Build Phase 2A** B (11.8)A (9.5)C (31.3)C (29.6) 26' 2026 Build Phase 1 A (9.8)*A (9.2)*C (23.1)E (40.8) 8'5' 2030 Build Phase 2A** C (25.2)A (8.7)C (34.3)C (31.8) 20'88' C (25.3) 2030 Build Phase 2B B (10.4)*A (9.0)*C (18.6)F ($) 13'13' 2030 Build Phase 2B** B (12.2)B (11.8) Intersection - - B (15.7) C (19.4) - ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 140 of 198 Page 9 kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 The phased capacity analysis results at the proposed intersection of Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 are summarized in Table 7. Site Access #1 is proposed to be constructed with one ingress lane and two egress lanes. This driveway is proposed to construct the westbound approach and is proposed to consist of a dedicated right turn lane with 150 feet of storage with appropriate taper and a shared through-left lane. Site Access #1 may not be constructed in Phase 2, thus results are only presented for Phase 2B in the case this site access is constructed in Phase 2. This site access will be constructed for Phase 3 of the development. For Scenario B for Phase 2 of the development (access via Belvedere Clearwater Road and Edgefield Road), the westbound site access is anticipated to operate with short delays during the AM and PM peak hours. The mainline, southbound left-turn is also anticipated to operate with short delays during the AM and PM peak hours. A northbound right-turn lane with 100’ of storage is recommended in Phase 2, if this site access is constructed during this phase. For Phase 3 of the development (access via Belvedere Clearwater Road and Edgefield Road), the westbound approach is anticipated to operate with short delays during the AM peak hour and moderate delays during the PM peak hour. The southbound approach is anticipated to operate with short delays during the AM and PM peak hour for Phase 3. If the site access is not constructed in Phase 2, the northbound right-turn lane is recommended to be constructed during this phase. Further a traffic signal warrant analysis should be conducted at the completion of Phase 3 of the development at this intersection. If a traffic signal is warranted, a traffic signal is recommended during this Phase of development. The phased improvements are listed below: Phase 2B · Construct a northbound right-turn lane with 100’ of storage and appropriate taper. Phase 3 · If the site access is not constructed in Phase 2, construct a northbound right-turn lane with 100’ of storage and appropriate taper. · It is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the MUTCD once Phase 3 of the proposed development is constructed and occupied. A signal is recommended to be constructed when warranted at this intersection. Phase 4 · If a signal is not warranted in Phase 3, it is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the MUTCD once Phase 4 of the proposed development is constructed and occupied. A signal is recommended to be constructed when warranted at this intersection. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 141 of 198 Page 10 kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 WBLWBRNBTNBRSBLSBT AM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q 40'20'13'0' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q 55'38'15'0' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q 95'49'181'25'39'115' PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q 60'23'25'0' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q 110'38'0'0'48'0' LOS (Delay) Synchro 95th Q 108'53'298'32'102'133' Intersection Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 LOS (Delay) Condition Measure WB (Site Access #1)NB (Edgefield Road)SB (Edgefield Road) *Major street left-turn delay **Signalized 2030 Build Phase 2B C (17.2)A (0.0)B (10.2)*-0' 2030 Build Phase 2B C (24.6)A (0.0)B (13.0)*-0' 2032 Build Phase 3** C (20.0)B (12.9)A (6.4)B (11.1) 2032 Build Phase 3** C (25.6)B (13.2)A (6.4)B (11.5) 2032 Build Phase 3 C (19.2)A (0.0)B (10.7)* -0' 2032 Build Phase 3 E (38.7)A (0.0)C (15.6)* - ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 142 of 198 Page 11 kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 CONCLUSION The purpose of this memorandum is to document when proposed improvements and traffic signals recommended in the Kellogg Tract Traffic Impact Analysis (Kimley-Horn, October 2024) will likely be required. The Kellogg Tract Traffic Impact Analysis analyzed the full development in one phase. This memorandum analyzes four phases of development for the Kellogg Tract at a proposed site access along Belvedere Clearwater Road (Site Access #2) and a proposed site access along Edgefield Road (Site Access #1). In the masterplan TIA for the Kellogg tract a traffic signal was recommended at Edgefield Road and Site Access #1 and Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2. The Kellogg Tract is proposed to be constructed in four phases of development. Phase 1 of the Kellogg Tract Development is proposed to consist of: · 201 dwelling units (DU) single family detached · 215 DU single family attached Phase 2 of the Kellogg Tract Development is proposed to consist of: · 30,000 square feet of general office building · 25,000 square feet of strip retail plaza · 4,000 square feet of convenience store/gas station (9-15 fueling positions) · 15,000 square feet of high-turnover sit-down restaurant space · 545 DU single family detached · 15,000 square feet of daycare space Phase 3 of the Kellogg Tract Development is proposed to consist of: · 362 DU single family detached Phase 4 of the Kellogg Tract Development is proposed to consist of: · 105 DU single family detached ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 143 of 198 Page 12 kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 The following mitigation is proposed at the interseciton of Belvedere Clearwater Road at Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2: Phase 1: · Construct the site access with one ingress lane and two egress lanes · Construct a westbound right-turn lane with 300’ of storage and an appropriate taper length Phase 2A and Phase 2B · A traffic signal is projected to be warranted during this phase of development · It is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the MUTCD once Phase 2 of the proposed development is constructed and occupied. A signal is recommended to be constructed when warranted at this intersection. Phase 3 and Phase 4 of the development are not anticipated to necessitate the need for further mitigation at this interseciton. The following mitigation is proposed at the interseciton of Edgefield Road at Site Access #1: Phase 2B · Construct a northbound right-turn lane with 100’ of storage and appropriate taper. Phase 3 · If the site access is not constructed in Phase 2, construct a northbound right-turn lane with 100’ of storage and appropriate taper. · It is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the MUTCD once Phase 3 of the proposed development is constructed and occupied. A signal is recommended to be constructed when warranted at this intersection. Phase 4 · If a signal is not warranted in Phase 3, it is recommended to conduct a full traffic signal warrant analysis per the MUTCD once Phase 4 of the proposed development is constructed Attachments: · Attachment A: Phased Site Plan · Attachment B: Volume Development Worksheets · Attachment C: Capacity Analysis Reports ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 144 of 198 Attachments kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Attachment A: Phased Site Plan ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 145 of 198 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 146 of 198 Attachments kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Attachment B: Volume Development Worksheets ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 147 of 198 Attachments kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Phase 1 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 148 of 198 INTERSECTION:Ridgefield Drive at Belvedere Clearwater Road/Site Access #2 COUNT DATE:May 9, 2024 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.83 AM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.85 PM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR AM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 00 556301053200130350000AM Volume Balancing 0000002000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000 AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 00 556301053400130350000 AM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%1%2%2%2%1%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% AM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR Years To Buildout 2222222222222222 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% AM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 00 2200022001010000 AM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)00 578301055600140360000 67 TOTAL AM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 000000 67000000000 AM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 00 578301062300140360000 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR Pass-By Entering 25%-25%-25%25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 45%55% Distribution Exiting 55%45% "AM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR Pass - By 00 00 0 0 Net New 0 20 00000 24 00000 66 0 54 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 0 2000000240000066054 AM 2026 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 0 20578301062324014036066054 PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR PM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 00 541221295771090110000 PM Volume Balancing 0050000000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000 PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 00 546221295771090110000 PM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%1%2%2%3%1%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% PM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR Years To Buildout 2222222222222222 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% PM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 00 2210123000000000 PM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)00 568231306001090110000 48 TOTAL PM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 000000 48000000000 PM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 00 568231306481090110000 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR Pass-By Entering 25%-25%-25%25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 45%55% Distribution Exiting 55%45% "PM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR Pass - By 00 00 0 0 Net New 0 62 00000 76 00000 46 0 37 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 0 6200000760000046037 PM 2026 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 0 62568231306487709011046037 INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUME DEVELOPMENT AM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIA Project Trip PM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIA Project Trip ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 149 of 198 INTERSECTION:Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 COUNT DATE: AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 AM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 PM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR AM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 0000000000 5630006650AM Volume Balancing 0000000000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 0000000000 5630006650 AM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% AM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR Years To Buildout 2222222222222222 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% AM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 0000000000 23000270 AM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)0000000000 5860006920 25 TOTAL AM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 0000000000 2500000 AM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 0000000000 6110006920 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR Pass-By Entering -25%25%25%-25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 25% Distribution Exiting 25% "AM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR Pass - By 0 0 00 00 Net New 0000000000 30 000 11 0 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 0000000000 30000110 AM 2026 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 0000000000 6410007030 PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR PM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 0000000000 8120007350 PM Volume Balancing 0000000000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 0000000000 8120007350 PM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% PM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR Years To Buildout 2222222222222222 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% PM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 0000000000 33000300 PM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)0000000000 8450007650 15 TOTAL PM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 0000000000 1500000 PM 2026 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 0000000000 8600007650 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR Pass-By Entering -25%25%25%-25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 25% Distribution Exiting 25% "PM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBUEBLEBT EBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBUNBLNBTNBR SBUSBLSBTSBR Pass - By 0 0 00 00 Net New 0000000000 21 000 35 0 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 0000000000 21000350 PM 2026 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 0000000000 8810008000 INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUME DEVELOPMENT AM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIA Project Trip PM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIA Project Trip ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 150 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 523 23283 4 40 9 80 6 14 7 1 70 3 37 9 301 0 0 311 0 1 9 0 20 1 0 0 393 9 2 11 3120062724 0067060 0 0 8 60 7 0 7 12 0 64 1 0 70 3 0 0 4 69 9 0 122 21 7 0 67 67 4 8 6323 3898 13 8 62 7 75 9 16 026 5 03 0 0 0210 0 26 0 0 075 6 5 0 8 57 1 18 3 317 54 35 9 5616623 3061069940118 7 6 72 122 85720 640066 24 47016 5 10 20 126104131 344 10 148 20 5 43 4 22 1 578 14 0 6 3 36 557 492 56 44 618 591 48150 731 469 28 26 144 9 49 3 18 8 8 281 15 0 36 2 Kellogg Tract Development2026 Phase 1 Build AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I- 5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway Project Site SiteAccess#1 Sit e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#3 Project Site Legend xxAM PeakHourTraffic Volumes (xx) AM Peak Hour Pass-by Trips ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 151 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 523 19094 8 50 8 1,1 4 5 27 7 4 80 1 28 6 575 0 2 581 0 4 12 0 19 1 0 0 306 16 1 14 5821288031 03227770 0 0 9 87 9 2 7 12 (0) 0(0) (0 ) (0 ) 88 1 0 80 0 0 0 14 78 4 (0 ) (0 ) 2 200 31 6 0 25 78 8 27 8724 2252 70 89 3 83 3 15 010 2 01 0 0 0100 0 15 0 0 097 4 14 0 (0 ) (0 ) 10 61 5 21 2 215 37 16 7 4717648(0)8266155326365037 58 69126 608046 77 (0) 96036 4 7 (0)62 2435492 381 30 69 8 8 75 7 43 9 (0)568 9 0 7 23 11 629 886 60 88 939 17 7 1 12 871 036 716 34 30 3540 9 62 8 43 60 6 373 31 9 93 6 Kellogg Tract Development2026 Phase 1 Build PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I- 5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway Project Site SiteAccess#1 Sit e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#3 Project Site Legend xxPM PeakHourTraffic Volumes (xx) PM Peak Hour Pass-by Trips ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 152 of 198 Attachments kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Phase 2 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 153 of 198 INTERSECTION:Ridgefield Drive at Belvedere Clearwater Road/Site Access #2 COUNT DATE:May 9, 2024 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.83 AM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.85 PM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 00 556301053200130350000 AM Volume Balancing 0000002000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000 AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 00 556301053400130350000 AM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%1%2%2%2%1%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Years To Buildout 6666666666666666 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 00 7000167002040000 AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)00 626301160100150390000 67 02000000240000066054 TOTAL AM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 0 20000067240000066054 AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 0 20626301166824015039066054 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass-By Entering 25%-25%-25%25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 45%55% Distribution Exiting 55%45% "AM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass - By 18-18 -1818 18 18 Net New 0 142 00000 173 00000 221 0 181 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 0 160-18000-18191000002390199 AM 2030 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 0 180608301165021501503903050253 PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 00541221295771090110000 PM Volume Balancing 0050000000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000 PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 00 546221295771090110000 PM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%1%2%2%3%1%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Years To Buildout 6666666666666666 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 00 6930473001010000 PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)00 6152513365010100120000 48 06200000760000046037 TOTAL PM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 0 62000048760000046037 PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 0 626152513369877010012046037 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass-By Entering 25%-25%-25%25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 45%55% Distribution Exiting 55%45% "PM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass - By 28-28 -2828 28 28 Net New 0 194 00000 236 00000 178 0 146 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 0 222-28000-28264000002060174 PM 2030 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 0 2845872513367034101001202520211 Project Trip Project Trip PM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIAKellogg Tract - Phase 1 INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUME DEVELOPMENT AM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIA Kellogg Tract - Phase 1 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 154 of 198 INTERSECTION:Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 COUNT DATE: AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 AM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 PM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 0000000000 5630006650 AM Volume Balancing 0000000000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 0000000000 5630006650 AM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Years To Buildout 6666666666666666 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 0000000000 71000840 AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)0000000000 6340007490 25 000000000030000110 TOTAL AM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 0000000000 55000110 AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 0000000000 6890007600 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass-By Entering Distribution Exiting Net New Entering 25% Distribution Exiting 25% "AM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass - By Net New 0000000000 101 000 79 0 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 0000000000 101000790 AM 2030 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 0000000000 7900008390 PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 00000000008120007350 PM Volume Balancing 0000000000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 0000000000 8120007350 PM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Years To Buildout 6666666666666666 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 0000000000 102000930 PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)0000000000 9140008280 15 000000000021000350 TOTAL PM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 0000000000 36000350 PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 0000000000 9500008630 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass-By Entering Distribution Exiting Net New Entering 25% Distribution Exiting 25% "PM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass - By Net New 0000000000 81 000 108 0 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 0000000000 810001080 PM 2030 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 0000000000 1,031000 9710 Project Trip Project Trip PM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIAKellogg Tract - Phase 1 INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUME DEVELOPMENT AM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIA Kellogg Tract - Phase 1 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 155 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 9 9 336 16 0 42 2 30 28 152 5 57 1 19 834 56226158961 47 724 14 2 1 52 449 11 158 21 6 47 0 30 2 (-18)608 15 0 7 3 39 71811(18)180 135171139 0 30 5 215(18) 97017 7 3178079643119 6 7 74 130 97021 737 (1 8 ) 9 61 8 27 6 439 25 3 38 4 5817650(-18) (1 8 ) 0 27 7 0 091 4 6 0 3 0 0 023090 0 17 027 7 0 42106 14 9 77 5 72 80 7 9 7813 23 8 0 0 122583 4 79 0 0 83 9 0 0 0 9 75 4 0 8 140 0078420 0 0 0 426 10 2 12 3380077526 1 10 0 21 1 0 0 337 0183 9 41 0 325 97 0 15 8 566 25198 1 44 3 Kellogg Tract Development2030 Phase 2A Build AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I- 5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway Project Site SiteAccess#1 Sit e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#3 Project Site Legend xxAM PeakHourTraffic Volumes (xx) AM Peak Hour Pass-by Trips ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 156 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 65 7 446 34 10 1,0 5 5 37 33 3847 3 71 1 46 039 8201561,002 65 96 1,055 29 5 1 13 6 474 33 73 9 9 82 0 55 9 (-28)587 10 0 8 25 12 7698(28)284 25810593 0 25 2 341(28) 16 6 039 1 8687965628366037 59 80828 717 (2 8 ) 11 66 6 33 4 311 21 1 17 8 4918670(-28) (2 8 ) 0 15 1 0 01,1 3 3 15 0 1 0 0 01101,0 0 7 16 010 3 0 2456 75 1,0 4 5 27 95 8 29 1,0 2 2 5 34 7 0 2 2001595 4 1,0 3 1 0 97 1 0 0 0 10 1,0 2 9 2 8 140 03249460 0 0 0 331 17 1 15 63012 1,0 3 0 34 5 14 0 20 1 0 2 628 0597 2 31 0 623 1,3 1 8 29 9 566 2061,1 3 2 55 0 Kellogg Tract Development2030 Phase 2A Build PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I- 5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway Project Site SiteAccess#1 Sit e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#3 Project Site Legend xxPM PeakHourTraffic Volumes (xx) PM Peak Hour Pass-by Trips ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 157 of 198 INTERSECTION:Ridgefield Drive at Belvedere Clearwater Road/Site Access #2 COUNT DATE:May 9, 2024 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.83 AM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.85 PM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 00 556301053200130350000 AM Volume Balancing 0000002000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000 AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 00 556301053400130350000 AM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%1%2%2%2%1%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Years To Buildout 6666666666666666 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 00 7000167002040000 AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)00 626301160100150390000 67 02000000240000066054 TOTAL AM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 0 20000067240000066054 AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 0 20626301166824015039066054 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass-By Entering 25%-25%-25%25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 55% Distribution Exiting 55% "AM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass - By 18-18 -1818 18 18 Net New 0000000 173 00000 221 00 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 0 18-18000-1819100000239018 AM 2030 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 0 3860830116502150150390305072 PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 00541221295771090110000 PM Volume Balancing 0050000000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000 PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 00 546221295771090110000 PM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%1%2%2%3%1%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Years To Buildout 6666666666666666 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 00 6930473001010000 PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)00 6152513365010100120000 48 06200000760000046037 TOTAL PM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 0 62000048760000046037 PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 0 626152513369877010012046037 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass-By Entering 25%-25%-25%25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 55% Distribution Exiting 55% "PM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass - By 28-28 -2828 28 28 Net New 0000000 236 00000 178 00 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 0 28-28000-2826400000206028 PM 2030 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 0 90587251336703410100120252065 INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUME DEVELOPMENT AM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIA Kellogg Tract - Phase 1 Project Trip PM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIAKellogg Tract - Phase 1 Project Trip ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 158 of 198 INTERSECTION:Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 COUNT DATE: AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 AM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 PM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 0000000000 5630006650 AM Volume Balancing 0000000000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 0000000000 5630006650 AM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Years To Buildout 6666666666666666 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 0000000000 71000840 AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)0000000000 6340007490 25 000000000030000110 TOTAL AM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 0000000000 55000110 AM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 0000000000 6890007600 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass-By Entering -25%25%25%-25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 20%25% Distribution Exiting 20%25% "AM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass - By 18 18 -1818 18-18 Net New 00000 81 0 101 000 63 0 79 00 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 00000 99011900-1881097-180 AM 2030 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 00000 99011900671810977420 PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 00000000008120007350 PM Volume Balancing 0000000000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 0000000000 8120007350 PM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Years To Buildout 6666666666666666 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 0000000000 102000930 PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)0000000000 9140008280 15 000000000021000350 TOTAL PM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 0000000000 36000350 PM 2030 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 0000000000 9500008630 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass-By Entering -25%25%25%-25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 20%25% Distribution Exiting 20%25% "PM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass - By 28 28 -2828 28-28 Net New 00000 65 0 81 000 86 0 108 00 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 00000 93010900-281140136-280 PM 2030 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 00000 9301090092211401368350 INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUME DEVELOPMENT AM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIA Kellogg Tract - Phase 1 Project Trip PM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIAKellogg Tract - Phase 1 Project Trip ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 159 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 566 25198 1 44 3 97 0 15 8 1 83 9 41 0 325 0 0 337 0 1 10 0 21 1 0 0 426 10 2 12 3380077526 0078420 0 0 9 75 4 0 8 14 (18) 99 (18) (-1 8 ) (1 8 ) 67 1 81 74 2 97 119 5 83 6 (-1 8 ) (18 ) 0 122 23 8 0 72 80 9 9 7433 42106 14 9 73 7 90 2 17 027 7 03 0 0 0230 0 27 7 0 087 6 6 0 (1 8 ) (1 8 ) 9 69 9 19 7 338 72 38 4 5817650(-18)3178079643119 6 7 74 130 97021 737030 5 215(18) 97017 7 11 (18)38 135171139 368 11 158 21 6 53 3 23 9 (-18)608 15 0 7 3 39 718 589 61 47 724 14 2 1 52261 834 562 30 28 152 5 57 1 19 9 9 336 16 0 42 2 Kellogg Tract Development2030 Phase 2B Build AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I- 5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway Project Site SiteAccess#1 Sit e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#3 Project Site Legend xxAM PeakHourTraffic Volumes (xx) AM Peak Hour Pass-by Trips ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 160 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 566 2061,1 3 2 55 0 1,3 1 8 29 9 5 97 2 31 0 623 0 2 628 0 5 14 0 20 1 0 0 331 17 1 15 63012 1,0 3 0 34 03249460 0 0 10 1,0 2 9 2 8 14 (28) 93 (28) (-2 8 ) (2 8 ) 92 2 11 4 83 5 13 6 109 15 91 1 (-2 8 ) (28 ) 2 200 34 7 0 27 91 5 29 1,0 2 7 5 2456 75 1,0 5 0 96 4 16 010 3 01 0 0 0110 0 15 1 0 01,1 3 8 15 0 (2 8 ) (2 8 ) 11 73 1 22 6 230 65 17 8 4918670(-28)8687965628366037 59 80828 717025 2 341(28) 16 6 039 1 8 (28)90 25810593 409 33 73 9 9 90 6 47 3 (-28)587 10 0 8 25 12 769 1,002 65 96 1,055 29 5 1 13 6156 039 820 37 33 3847 3 71 1 46 65 7 446 34 10 1,0 5 5 Kellogg Tract Development2030 Phase 2B Build PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I- 5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway Project Site SiteAccess#1 Sit e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#3 Project Site Legend xxPM PeakHourTraffic Volumes (xx) PM Peak Hour Pass-by Trips ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 161 of 198 Attachments kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Phase 3 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 162 of 198 INTERSECTION:Ridgefield Drive at Belvedere Clearwater Road/Site Access #2 COUNT DATE:May 9, 2024 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.83 AM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.85 PM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 00 556301053200130350000 AM Volume Balancing 0000002000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000 AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 00 556301053400130350000 AM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%1%2%2%2%1%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% AM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Years To Buildout 8888888888888888Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% AM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 00 9510292002060000 AM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)00 651401262600150410000 67 02000000240000066054 018-18000-1819100000239018 TOTAL AM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 0 38-180004921500000305072 AM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 0 3863340126752150150410305072 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass-By Entering 25%-25%-25%25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 10%40% Distribution Exiting 2%37%13% "AM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass - By 00 00 0 0 Net New 0 6 0000 4 27 00000 66 0 23 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 0600004 270000066023 AM 2032 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 0 4463340126792420150410371095 PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 00541221295771090110000 PM Volume Balancing 0050000000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000 PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 00 546221295771090110000 PM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%1%2%2%3%1%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% PM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Years To Buildout 8888888888888888 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% PM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 00 9440599002020000 PM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)00 6402613467610110130000 48 06200000760000046037 028-28000-2826400000206028 TOTAL PM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 0 90-280002034000000252065 PM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 0 90612261346963410110130252065 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass-By Entering 25%-25%-25%25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 10%40% Distribution Exiting 2%37%13% "PM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass - By 00 00 0 0 Net New 0 21 0000 294 00000 46 0 16 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 0 2100002940000046016 PM 2032 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 0 111612261346984350110130298081 INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUME DEVELOPMENT AM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIA Kellogg Tract - Phase 1 Kellogg Tract - Phase 2 Project Trip PM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIA Kellogg Tract - Phase 1 Kellogg Tract - Phase 2 Project Trip ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 163 of 198 INTERSECTION:Edgefield Road at Site Access #1 COUNT DATE: AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 AM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 PM FUTURE PEAK HOUR FACTOR:0.90 AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR AM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 0000000000 5630006650 AM Volume Balancing 0000000000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor AM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 0000000000 5630006650 AM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% AM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Years To Buildout 8888888888888888Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% AM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 0000000000 970001140 AM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)0000000000 6600007790 25 000000000030000110 0000099011900-1881097-180 TOTAL AM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 00000 990119003781097 -70 AM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 00000 99011900697810977720 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass-By Entering -25%25%25%-25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 12%33% Distribution Exiting 9%36%2% "AM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass - By 0 0 00 00 Net New 00000 16 0 64 00 47 0 20 00 AM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 00000 16064004702000 AM 2032 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 00000 1150183007018801177720 PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR PM Adjusted Turning Movement Counts1 00000000008120007350 PM Volume Balancing 0000000000000000 Peak Season Correction Factor PM 2024 EXISTING TRAFFIC 0000000000 8120007350 PM Heavy Vehicle Percentage 2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2%2% PM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Years To Buildout 8888888888888888 Annual Growth Rate 2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0% PM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC GROWTH 0000000000 1390001260 PM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC (No AD)0000000000 9510008610 15 000000000021000350 0000093010900-281140136-280 TOTAL PM APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC 00000 930109008114013670 PM 2032 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC 00000 9301090095911401368680 "SITE TRAFFIC DISTRUBUTION" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass-By Entering -25%25%25%-25% Distribution Exiting 25%25% Net New Entering 12%33% Distribution Exiting 9%36%2% "PM PROJECT TRIPS" LAND USE TYPE EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT SBR Pass - By 0 0 00 00 Net New 00000 11 0 44 00 225 0 69 00 PM TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 00000 110440022506900 PM 2032 BUILD-OUT TRAFFIC 00000 10401530096113902058680 INTERSECTION TRAFFIC VOLUME DEVELOPMENT AM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIA Kellogg Tract - Phase 1 Kellogg Tract - Phase 2 Project Trip PM Peak Hour Approved Development 1: Highland Springs TIA Kellogg Tract - Phase 1 Kellogg Tract - Phase 2 Project Trip ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 164 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 589 2621,0 2 9 46 0 1,0 3 9 16 9 1 88 3 42 6 339 0 0 353 0 1 29 0 28 1 0 0 452 14 2 31 3540083954 0078930 0 0 11 84 4 0 9 14 (0) 115(0) (0 ) (0 ) 70 1 88 77 2 11 7 183 7 88 0 (0 ) (0 ) 0 122 23 9 0 77 85 0 9 7784 44110 15 5 77 2 94 5 20 028 3 04 0 0 0240 3 29 1 0 991 6 6 0 (0 ) (0 ) 9 75 9 20 4 353 95 39 9 5919679(0)3282683644820 9 7 77 136 1,01122 769037 1 242(0) 10 7 018 5 12 (0)44 146182149 401 12 165 23 6 56 5 25 4 (0)633 15 0 7 4 41 772 635 64 51 774 15 5 1 55300 835 605 32 29 156 1 61 0 20 9 9 353 16 0 44 5 Kellogg Tract Development2032 Phase 3 Build AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I- 5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway Project Site SiteAccess#1 Sit e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#3 Project Site Legend xxAM PeakHourTraffic Volumes (xx) AM Peak Hour Pass-by Trips ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 165 of 198 14 'Int 14'! 11 'Int 11'!12 'Int 12'!13 'Int 13'! 15 'Int 15'! 17 'Int 17'! 10 'Int 10'! 9 'Int 9'! 8 'Int 8'!16 'Int 16'! 1 'Int 1'!3 'Int 3'!4 'Int 4'!5 'Int 5'!6 'Int 6'!7 'Int 7'! 2 'Int 2'! 589 2181,2 1 4 57 2 1,3 9 2 31 3 5 1,0 5 1 32 2 648 0 2 665 0 5 26 0 42 1 0 0 350 29 1 27 66612 1,0 9 4 53 04251,0 4 5 0 0 0 12 1,1 1 2 2 10 14 (0) 104(0) (0 ) (0 ) 96 1 13 9 86 8 20 5 153 16 95 4 (0 ) (0 ) 2 200 35 9 0 29 95 7 30 1,0 9 0 5 2759 78 1,1 1 0 1,0 0 6 17 010 8 01 0 0 0140 11 15 4 0 61,2 0 0 15 0 (0 ) (0 ) 12 78 2 23 4 239 81 19 1 5019698(0)8897170829475039 61 86629 771029 8 435(0) 20 0 040 7 8 (0)111 271112104 438 34 76 11 9 95 8 51 0 (0)612 11 0 8 26 13 815 1,056 70 101 1,110 33 8 1 14 6188 041 869 39 34 4050 0 75 0 48 68 7 478 35 11 1,1 1 6 Kellogg Tract Development2032 Phase 3 Build PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d ChaletNorth Boulevard ElizabethAvenue Rid g e f i e l d Dri v e BelvedereClearwaterRoad I-5 2 0 W B O f f I- 5 2 0 W B O n I-5 2 0 E B O n I- 5 2 0 E B O f f Ch e r o k e e D r i v e Old S u d l o w La k e R o a d Bu c h a n a n Pa r k w a y HamptonAvenue CelesteAvenue JohnsonRoad JohnsonRoad ClearmontDrive Ed g e f i e l d Ro a d Ascauga Lake Road US 25 Connector Road I-5 2 0 W B Ra m p s I-5 2 0 E B Ra m p s GeorgiaAvenue BuchananParkway Driveway Driveway Project Site SiteAccess#1 Sit e Ac c e s s #2 SiteAccess#3 Project Site Legend xxPM PeakHourTraffic Volumes (xx) PM Peak Hour Pass-by Trips ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 166 of 198 Attachments kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Attachment C: Capacity Analysis Reports ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 167 of 198 Attachments kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Phase 1 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 168 of 198 HCM 6th TWSC Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2026 P1 Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Movement EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20578310623241403666054 Future Vol, veh/h20578310623241403666054 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeStopStopStopStopStopStop RT Channelized--None--None--None--None Storage Length50--225-----75-- Veh in Median Storage, #-0--0--0--0- Grade, %-0--0--0--0- Peak Hour Factor909090 90 9090909090909090 Heavy Vehicles, %212212222222 Mvmt Flow 22642311692271604073060 Major/MinorMajor1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All71900645001056142932310931417360 Stage 1 ------688688-728728- Stage 2 ------368741-365689- Critical Hdwy 4.14--4.14--7.546.546.947.546.546.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1------6.545.54-6.545.54- Critical Hdwy Stg 2------6.545.54-6.545.54- Follow-up Hdwy2.22--2.22--3.524.023.323.524.023.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver878--936--180134673169136637 Stage 1 ------403445-381427- Stage 2 ------624421-627445- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver878--936--159129673154131637 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver------159129-154131- Stage 1 ------393434-371422- Stage 2 ------559416-575434- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v0.3 0.1 16.1 31.4 HCM LOS C D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)159673878--936--154637 HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.0980.0590.025--0.012--0.4760.094 HCM Control Delay (s/veh)30.110.79.2--8.9--4811.2 HCM Lane LOS DBA--A--EB HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)0.30.20.1--0--2.20.3 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 169 of 198 HCM 6th TWSC Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2026 P1 Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBLEBTEBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 6256823130648779011460 37 Future Vol, veh/h6256823130648779011460 37 Conflicting Peds, #/hr0000000000000 Sign Control FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeStopStopStopStopStopStop RT Channelized--None---None--None--None Storage Length50---225-----75-- Veh in Median Storage, #-0---0--0--0- Grade, %-0---0--0--0- Peak Hour Factor909090 90 9090909090909090 90 Heavy Vehicles, %2122312222222 Mvmt Flow 69631261337208610012510 41 Major/MinorMajor1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All80600657657001210165632912851626403 Stage 1 -------782782-831831- Stage 2 -------428874-454795- Critical Hdwy 4.14--6.444.16--7.546.546.947.546.546.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1-------6.545.54-6.545.54- Critical Hdwy Stg 2-------6.545.54-6.545.54- Follow-up Hdwy2.22--2.522.23--3.524.023.323.524.023.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver814--550920--13897667122101597 Stage 1 -------353403-330383- Stage 2 -------575365-555398- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver814--900900--1178566710989597 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver-------11785-10989- Stage 1 -------323369-302368- Stage 2 -------515351-499364- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v0.9 0.4 23.1 40.8 HCM LOS C E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)117667814--900--109597 HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.0850.0180.085--0.038--0.4690.069 HCM Control Delay (s/veh)38.610.59.8--9.2--64.311.5 HCM Lane LOS EBA--A--FB HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)0.30.10.3--0.1--2.10.2 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 170 of 198 Attachments kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Phase 2 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 171 of 198 Queues Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2A Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Lane Group EBLEBTWBLWBTWBR NBTNBR SBLSBT Lane Group Flow (vph)200679127222391743339281 v/c Ratio 0.710.420.040.450.280.070.140.810.47 Control Delay (s/veh)27.610.8 9.1 11.1 2.4 30.3 1.0 38.711.4 Queue Delay 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 Total Delay (s/veh)27.610.8 9.1 11.1 2.4 30.3 1.0 38.711.4 Queue Length 50th (ft)56832900609228 Queue Length 95th (ft)1351251013429260#339114 Internal Link Dist (ft)24061516 368 420 Turn Bay Length (ft)50 225 300 7575 Base Capacity (vph)5012835538283813066946584211118 Starvation Cap Reductn000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.400.240.020.250.180.020.070.810.25 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 172 of 198 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2A Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Movement EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBR NBLNBTNBR SBLSBTSBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)180608311650215150393050253 Future Volume (veh/h)180608311650215150393050253 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln187018851870187018851870187018701870187018701870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h200676312722239170433390281 Peak Hour Factor 0.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %212212222222 Cap, veh/h 34519339427189383818701174230467 Arrive On Green 0.530.530.530.530.530.530.070.000.070.130.000.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 58436571676135821585109801585178101585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h20033134812722239170433390281 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln5841791188276117911585109801585178101585 Q Serve(g_s), s 20.8 7.37.30.68.15.71.00.01.89.00.0 10.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 28.9 7.37.37.98.15.71.00.01.89.00.0 10.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.011.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h345946995427189383818701174230467 V/C Ratio(X)0.580.350.350.030.380.290.090.000.370.800.000.60 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h424118812485292376105139704214230771 HCM Platoon Ratio1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.001.001.001.001.001.001.000.001.001.000.001.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.0 9.39.3 11.5 9.48.9 29.6 0.0 29.925.4 0.0 20.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.50.20.20.00.10.20.20.01.9 10.6 0.01.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.42.22.30.12.41.50.30.00.72.10.03.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 19.5 9.59.5 11.6 9.69.1 29.8 0.0 31.936.0 0.0 21.8 LnGrp LOS BAABAAC CD C Approach Vol, veh/h 879 973 60 620 Approach Delay, s/veh 11.8 9.5 31.3 29.6 Approach LOS B A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 234 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 41.915.011.0 41.9 26.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.06.06.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s45.0 9.0 18.0 45.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s30.911.0 3.8 10.1 12.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.90.00.1 6.1 1.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 15.7 HCM 6th LOS B ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 173 of 198 HCM 6th TWSC Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2A Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 365.4 Movement EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 180608311650215150393050253 Future Vol, veh/h180608311650215150393050253 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeStopStopStopStopStopStop RT Channelized--None--None--None--None Storage Length50--225-----75-- Veh in Median Storage, #-0--0--0--0- Grade, %-0--0--0--0- Peak Hour Factor909090 90 9090909090909090 Heavy Vehicles, %212212222222 Mvmt Flow 200676312722239170433390281 Major/MinorMajor1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All96100679001463206334016041945481 Stage 1 ------10781078-866866- Stage 2 ------385985-7381079- Critical Hdwy 4.14--4.14--7.546.546.947.546.546.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1------6.545.54-6.545.54- Critical Hdwy Stg 2------6.545.54-6.545.54- Follow-up Hdwy2.22--2.22--3.524.023.323.524.023.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver712--909--90 54656~ 7064531 Stage 1 ------233293-~ 314369- Stage 2 ------610324-376293- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver712--909--33 38656~ 5145531 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver------3338-~ 5145- Stage 1 ------168211-~ 226364- Stage 2 ------283320-~ 253211- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v2.7 0.1 62.2 $ 1482.5 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)33656712--909--51531 HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.5050.0660.281--0.013--6.6450.529 HCM Control Delay (s/veh)195.610.9 12--9--$ 2696.319.2 HCM Lane LOS FBB--A--FC HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)1.70.21.2--0--39.23.1 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 174 of 198 Queues Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2A Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Lane Group EBLEBTWBLWBTWBRNBTNBRSBLSBT Lane Group Flow (vph)31668038744 3791113 280234 v/c Ratio 0.760.300.090.33 0.330.070.05 0.990.54 Control Delay (s/veh)27.37.27.67.41.9 33.00.4 80.914.1 Queue Delay 0.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.0 0.00.0 Total Delay (s/veh)27.37.27.67.41.9 33.00.4 80.914.1 Queue Length 50th (ft)6445451040~13730 Queue Length 95th (ft)#29312122135 35200 #24088 Internal Link Dist (ft)2406 1516 368 420 Turn Bay Length (ft)50 225 300 75 75 Base Capacity (vph)4152259446 22711144474484 283820 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.760.300.090.33 0.330.020.03 0.990.29 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 175 of 198 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2A Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Movement EBLEBTEBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)284587251 33670341 100122520 Future Volume (veh/h)284587251 33670341 100122520 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000 00000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.001.001.00 1.001.001.00 1.001.001.001.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 187018851870 185618851870 187018701870 18701870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 31665228 37744379 110132800 Peak Hour Factor 0.900.900.90 0.900.900.90 0.900.900.900.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %212 31222222 Cap, veh/h 332204588 4632094927 16801033800 Arrive On Green 0.580.580.58 0.580.580.58 0.060.000.060.12 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 5023499150 75435821585 114601585 17810 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 316334346 37744379 110132800 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 50217911858 75417911585 114601585 17810 Q Serve(g_s), s 36.67.37.3 2.0 8.410.0 0.70.00.69.00.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 45.07.37.3 9.4 8.410.0 0.70.00.69.00.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 33210471086 4632094927 16801033800 V/C Ratio(X)0.950.320.32 0.080.360.41 0.070.000.130.74 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 33210471086 4632094927 36203713800 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.001.001.00 1.001.001.00 1.001.001.001.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.001.001.00 1.001.001.00 1.000.001.001.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.78.28.2 10.6 8.48.7 34.00.033.929.40.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 36.70.20.2 0.1 0.10.3 0.20.00.57.40.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.00.00.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln9.02.22.3 0.3 2.52.7 0.20.00.25.80.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 61.48.38.3 10.6 8.59.0 34.20.034.536.70.0 LnGrp LOS EAA BAAC CD Approach Vol, veh/h 996 1160 24 514 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.2 8.7 34.3 31.8 Approach LOS C A C C Timer - Assigned Phs 234 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 51.015.011.0 51.0 26.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.06.06.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 45.09.018.0 45.0 33.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 47.011.02.7 12.0 11.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.00.00.0 7.2 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 19.4 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved ignoring U-Turning movement. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 176 of 198 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2A Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Movement SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)211 Future Volume (veh/h)211 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 Work Zone On Approach Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 234 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %2 Cap, veh/h 411 Arrive On Green 0.26 Sat Flow, veh/h 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 234 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 411 V/C Ratio(X)0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 679 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln3.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 26.0 LnGrp LOS C Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Timer - Assigned Phs ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 177 of 198 HCM 6th TWSC Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2A Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 619.2 Movement EBLEBTEBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 28458725133670341100122520211 Future Vol, veh/h28458725133670341100122520211 Conflicting Peds, #/hr0000000000000 Sign Control FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeStopStopStopStopStopStop RT Channelized--None---None--None--None Storage Length50---225-----75-- Veh in Median Storage, #-0---0--0--0- Grade, %-0---0--0--0- Peak Hour Factor909090 90 9090909090909090 90 Heavy Vehicles, %2122312222222 Mvmt Flow 31665228137744379110132800234 Major/MinorMajor1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All112300680680001746249734019682322562 Stage 1 -------12981298-10101010- Stage 2 -------4481199-9581312- Critical Hdwy 4.14--6.444.16--7.546.546.947.546.546.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1-------6.545.54-6.545.54- Critical Hdwy Stg 2-------6.545.54-6.545.54- Follow-up Hdwy2.22--2.522.23--3.524.023.323.524.023.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver618--532902--55 29656~ 3737470 Stage 1 -------171230-~ 257316- Stage 2 -------560257-~ 276227- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver618--883883--16 14656~ 2117470 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver-------1614-~ 2117- Stage 1 -------84112-~ 126302- Stage 2 -------269246-~ 132111- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v5.3 0.3 203.6 $ 3223.6 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)16656618--883--21470 HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.6940.020.511--0.043--13.3330.499 HCM Control Delay (s/veh)$ 435.210.616.7--9.3--$ 590620 HCM Lane LOS FBC--A--FC HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)1.80.12.9--0.1--35.32.7 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 178 of 198 Queues Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2B Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Lane Group EBLEBTWBLWBTWBR NBTNBR SBLSBT Lane Group Flow (vph)4267912722239174333980 v/c Ratio 0.200.530.050.560.330.070.140.620.12 Control Delay (s/veh)17.416.114.716.5 3.9 28.1 1.0 17.5 3.3 Queue Delay 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 Total Delay (s/veh)17.416.114.716.5 3.9 28.1 1.0 17.5 3.3 Queue Length 50th (ft)10943102050720 Queue Length 95th (ft)36171141834125016620 Internal Link Dist (ft)24061516 368 420 Turn Bay Length (ft)50 225 300 7575 Base Capacity (vph)4122550450255211987206798251305 Starvation Cap Reductn000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.100.270.030.280.200.020.060.410.06 Intersection Summary ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 179 of 198 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2B Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Movement EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBR NBLNBTNBR SBLSBTSBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)3860831165021515039305072 Future Volume (veh/h)3860831165021515039305072 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln187018851870187018851870187018701870187018701870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h4267631272223917043339080 Peak Hour Factor 0.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %212212222222 Cap, veh/h 25012746295124855225501356160656 Arrive On Green 0.350.350.350.350.350.350.090.000.090.210.000.41 Sat Flow, veh/h 58436571676135821585131901585178101585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h423313481272223917043339080 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln5841791188276117911585131901585178101585 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.27.57.50.68.35.80.60.01.37.90.01.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.5 7.57.58.18.35.80.60.01.37.90.01.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.011.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h250624656295124855225501356160656 V/C Ratio(X)0.170.530.530.040.580.430.070.000.320.550.000.12 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h4401207126854324141068613056694901382 HCM Platoon Ratio1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.001.001.001.001.001.001.000.001.001.000.001.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.113.113.116.413.412.621.4 0.0 21.713.9 0.09.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.30.70.70.10.40.50.10.01.30.80.00.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.42.42.50.12.61.60.20.00.52.90.00.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.413.813.816.413.813.221.5 0.0 23.014.7 0.09.2 LnGrp LOS BBBBBBC CB A Approach Vol, veh/h 721 973 60 419 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.1 13.7 22.6 13.6 Approach LOS B B C B Timer - Assigned Phs 234 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.616.610.3 23.6 26.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.06.06.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s34.020.018.0 34.0 44.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s13.5 9.93.3 10.3 3.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.10.80.1 5.6 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 14.1 HCM 6th LOS B ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 180 of 198 HCM 6th TWSC Kellogg Tract Development TIA 17: Edgefield Road & Site Access #1 2030 P2B Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.6 Movement WBLWBRNBTNBRSBLSBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 99119671 81 97742 Future Vol, veh/h99119671 81 97742 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000 Sign ControlStopStopFreeFreeFreeFree RT Channelized-None-None-None Storage Length075-250250- Veh in Median Storage, #2-0--0 Grade, %0-0--0 Peak Hour Factor909090 90 9090 Heavy Vehicles, %222222 Mvmt Flow 11013274690108824 Major/MinorMinor1Major1Major2 Conflicting Flow All1374373008360 Stage 1 746----- Stage 2 628----- Critical Hdwy 6.846.94--4.14- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84----- Follow-up Hdwy3.523.32--2.22- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver137624--794- Stage 1 430----- Stage 2 494----- Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver118624--794- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver308----- Stage 1 430----- Stage 2 427----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v17.20 1.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTNBRWBLn1WBLn2SBLSBT Capacity (veh/h)--308624794- HCM Lane V/C Ratio --0.3570.2120.136- HCM Control Delay (s/veh)--2312.310.2- HCM Lane LOS --CBB- HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)--1.60.80.5- ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 181 of 198 HCM 6th TWSC Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2B Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 166.6 Movement EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3860831165021515039305072 Future Vol, veh/h3860831165021515039305072 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeStopStopStopStopStopStop RT Channelized--None--None--None--None Storage Length50--225-----75-- Veh in Median Storage, #-0--0--0--0- Grade, %-0--0--0--0- Peak Hour Factor909090 90 9090909090909090 Heavy Vehicles, %212212222222 Mvmt Flow 4267631272223917043339080 Major/MinorMajor1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All96100679001147174734012881629481 Stage 1 ------762762-866866- Stage 2 ------385985-422763- Critical Hdwy 4.14--4.14--7.546.546.947.546.546.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1------6.545.54-6.545.54- Critical Hdwy Stg 2------6.545.54-6.545.54- Follow-up Hdwy2.22--2.22--3.524.023.323.524.023.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver712--909--154 85656~ 121101531 Stage 1 ------363412-~ 314369- Stage 2 ------610324-580411- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver712--909--124 79656~ 10794531 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver------12479-~ 10794- Stage 1 ------342388-~ 295364- Stage 2 ------511320-510387- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v0.6 0.1 18.6 $ 860.7 HCM LOS C F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)124656712--909--107531 HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.1340.0660.059--0.013--3.1670.151 HCM Control Delay (s/veh)38.510.910.4--9--$ 1060.813 HCM Lane LOS EBB--A--FB HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)0.50.20.2--0--32.90.5 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 182 of 198 Queues Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2B Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Lane Group EBLEBTWBLWBTWBR NBTNBR SBLSBT Lane Group Flow (vph)10068038744379111328072 v/c Ratio 0.410.460.140.500.430.040.040.570.12 Control Delay (s/veh)18.412.312.812.9 3.4 25.7 0.3 18.5 1.6 Queue Delay 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 Total Delay (s/veh)18.412.312.812.9 3.4 25.7 0.3 18.5 1.6 Queue Length 50th (ft)1451557020520 Queue Length 95th (ft)6814427161441801439 Internal Link Dist (ft)24061516 368 420 Turn Bay Length (ft)50 225 300 7575 Base Capacity (vph)5012995557301313947577086331326 Starvation Cap Reductn000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.200.230.070.250.270.010.020.440.05 Intersection Summary ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 183 of 198 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2B Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Movement EBLEBTEBRWBUWBLWBTWBR NBLNBTNBR SBLSBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)9058725133670341100122520 Future Volume (veh/h)9058725133670341100122520 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000 00000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.001.001.00 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln18701885187018561885187018701870187018701870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h10065228 37744379110132800 Peak Hour Factor 0.900.900.90 0.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %212 31222222 Cap, veh/h 275154766 363158470121701095210 Arrive On Green 0.440.440.44 0.440.440.440.070.000.070.170.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 5023499150 7543582158513280158517810 Grp Volume(v), veh/h100334346 37744379110132800 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln50217911858 7541791158513280158517810 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.0 7.37.3 2.08.3 10.0 0.40.00.47.70.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.3 7.37.3 9.38.3 10.0 0.40.00.47.70.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.08 1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h275792822 363158470121701095210 V/C Ratio(X)0.360.420.42 0.100.470.540.050.000.120.540.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h40412551302 5582511111154505006480 HCM Platoon Ratio1.001.001.00 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.001.001.00 1.001.001.001.000.001.001.000.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.710.910.9 14.111.211.725.0 0.0 25.017.7 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.80.40.3 0.10.20.70.10.00.50.90.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.02.22.3 0.32.52.80.10.00.23.00.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 18.511.311.3 14.211.412.325.1 0.0 25.518.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS BBB BBBC CB Approach Vol, veh/h 780 1160 24 352 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.2 11.8 25.3 17.4 Approach LOS B B C B Timer - Assigned Phs 234 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 31.215.9 9.9 31.2 25.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.06.06.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s40.014.018.0 40.0 38.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s20.3 9.72.4 12.0 3.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.90.30.0 7.0 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 12.9 HCM 6th LOS B Notes User approved ignoring U-Turning movement. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 184 of 198 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2B Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Movement SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)65 Future Volume (veh/h)65 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 Work Zone On Approach Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h72 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %2 Cap, veh/h 551 Arrive On Green 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h72 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h551 V/C Ratio(X)0.13 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h1055 HCM Platoon Ratio1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 12.8 LnGrp LOS B Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Timer - Assigned Phs ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 185 of 198 HCM 6th TWSC Kellogg Tract Development TIA 17: Edgefield Road & Site Access #1 2030 P2B Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh3 Movement WBLWBRNBTNBRSBLSBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 93109922114136835 Future Vol, veh/h93109922114136835 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000 Sign ControlStopStopFreeFreeFreeFree RT Channelized-None-None-None Storage Length075-250250- Veh in Median Storage, #2-0--0 Grade, %0-0--0 Peak Hour Factor909090 90 9090 Heavy Vehicles, %222222 Mvmt Flow 1031211024127151928 Major/MinorMinor1Major1Major2 Conflicting Flow All17905120011510 Stage 1 1024----- Stage 2 766----- Critical Hdwy 6.846.94--4.14- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84----- Follow-up Hdwy3.523.32--2.22- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver~ 72507--603- Stage 1 307----- Stage 2 419----- Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver~ 54507--603- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver214----- Stage 1 307----- Stage 2 314----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v24.60 1.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTNBRWBLn1WBLn2SBLSBT Capacity (veh/h)--214507603- HCM Lane V/C Ratio --0.4830.2390.251- HCM Control Delay (s/veh)--36.614.313- HCM Lane LOS --EBB- HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)--2.40.91- Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 186 of 198 HCM 6th TWSC Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2030 P2B Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 193.1 Movement EBLEBTEBRWBUWBLWBTWBRNBLNBTNBRSBLSBTSBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9058725133670341100122520 65 Future Vol, veh/h9058725133670341100122520 65 Conflicting Peds, #/hr0000000000000 Sign Control FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeStopStopStopStopStopStop RT Channelized--None---None--None--None Storage Length50---225-----75-- Veh in Median Storage, #-0---0--0--0- Grade, %-0---0--0--0- Peak Hour Factor909090 90 9090909090909090 90 Heavy Vehicles, %2122312222222 Mvmt Flow 10065228137744379110132800 72 Major/MinorMajor1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All112300680680001314206534015361890562 Stage 1 -------866866-10101010- Stage 2 -------4481199-526880- Critical Hdwy 4.14--6.444.16--7.546.546.947.546.546.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1-------6.545.54-6.545.54- Critical Hdwy Stg 2-------6.545.54-6.545.54- Follow-up Hdwy2.22--2.522.23--3.524.023.323.524.023.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver618--532902--116 54656~ 7969470 Stage 1 -------314369-~ 257316- Stage 2 -------560257-503363- Platoon blocked, %---- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver618--883883--83 43656~ 6655470 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver-------8343-~ 6655- Stage 1 -------263309-~ 215302- Stage 2 -------454246-413304- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v1.5 0.3 30.8 $ 1264.3 HCM LOS D F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h)83656618--883--66470 HCM Lane V/C Ratio0.1340.020.162--0.043--4.2420.154 HCM Control Delay (s/veh)5510.611.9--9.3--$ 1586.814 HCM Lane LOS FBB--A--FB HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)0.40.10.6--0.1--30.20.5 Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 187 of 198 Attachments kimley-horn.com 115 Fairchild St, Suite 250, Charleston, SC 29492 843 737 6390 Phase 3 ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 188 of 198 Queues Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2032 P3 Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Lane Group EBLEBTWBLWBTWBR NBTNBR SBLSBT Lane Group Flow (vph)49707137542691746412106 v/c Ratio 0.260.550.060.590.360.070.160.700.16 Control Delay (s/veh)19.817.215.817.7 3.9 30.7 1.1 20.4 6.3 Queue Delay 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 Total Delay (s/veh)19.817.215.817.7 3.9 30.7 1.1 20.4 6.3 Queue Length 50th (ft)131073116060978 Queue Length 95th (ft)43186162014426022138 Internal Link Dist (ft)24061516 368 420 Turn Bay Length (ft)50 225 300 7575 Base Capacity (vph)3422318377232011226816478571280 Starvation Cap Reductn000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.140.310.030.330.240.020.070.480.08 Intersection Summary ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 189 of 198 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2032 P3 Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Movement EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBR NBLNBTNBR SBLSBTSBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)4463341267924215041371095 Future Volume (veh/h)4463341267924215041371095 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln187018851870187018851870187018701870187018701870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h49703413754269170464120106 Peak Hour Factor 0.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %212212222222 Cap, veh/h 22913027278127756523301306560684 Arrive On Green 0.360.360.360.360.360.360.080.000.080.240.000.43 Sat Flow, veh/h 55136522174135821585128801585178101585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h4934536213754269170464120106 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln5511791188174117911585128801585178101585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.58.78.70.89.77.50.70.01.6 10.9 0.02.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 8.78.79.59.77.50.70.01.6 10.9 0.02.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.011.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h229638671278127756523301306560684 V/C Ratio(X)0.210.540.540.050.590.480.070.000.350.630.000.15 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h344101110624322022895536050391301286 HCM Platoon Ratio1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.001.001.001.001.001.001.000.001.001.000.001.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.714.514.518.314.914.124.2 0.0 24.615.1 0.09.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.50.70.70.10.40.60.10.01.61.00.00.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.52.93.10.13.22.20.20.00.64.10.00.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 21.115.215.218.415.314.824.3 0.0 26.216.1 0.09.9 LnGrp LOS CBBBBBC CB A Approach Vol, veh/h 756 1036 63 518 Approach Delay, s/veh 15.6 15.2 25.7 14.9 Approach LOS B B C B Timer - Assigned Phs 234 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.219.810.7 26.2 30.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.06.06.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s32.022.018.0 32.0 46.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s16.212.9 3.6 11.7 4.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.01.00.1 5.8 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 15.5 HCM 6th LOS B ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 190 of 198 Queues Kellogg Tract Development TIA 17: Edgefield Road & Site Access #1 2032 P3 Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Lane Group WBLWBR NBTNBR SBLSBT Lane Group Flow (vph)12820377998130858 v/c Ratio 0.400.450.560.140.300.42 Control Delay (s/veh)26.0 7.8 15.9 3.96.86.7 Queue Delay 0.00.00.00.00.00.0 Total Delay (s/veh)26.0 7.8 15.9 3.96.86.7 Queue Length 50th (ft)36010401563 Queue Length 95th (ft)95491812539115 Internal Link Dist (ft)1039 561 1493 Turn Bay Length (ft)75 250250 Base Capacity (vph)761796264612085363353 Starvation Cap Reductn000000 Spillback Cap Reductn000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.170.260.290.080.240.26 Intersection Summary ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 191 of 198 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Kellogg Tract Development TIA 17: Edgefield Road & Site Access #1 2032 P3 Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Movement WBLWBR NBTNBR SBLSBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)11518370188117772 Future Volume (veh/h)11518370188117772 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.001.00 1.001.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.001.001.001.001.001.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln187018701870187018701870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h12820377998130858 Peak Hour Factor 0.900.900.900.900.900.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222 Cap, veh/h 32128512465564142008 Arrive On Green 0.180.180.350.350.090.56 Sat Flow, veh/h 178115853647158517813647 Grp Volume(v), veh/h12820377998130858 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln178115851777158517811777 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.05.78.62.01.96.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.05.78.62.01.96.5 Prop In Lane 1.001.00 1.001.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h32128512465564142008 V/C Ratio(X)0.400.710.630.180.310.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h832741294413136764228 HCM Platoon Ratio1.001.001.001.001.001.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.001.001.001.001.001.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.018.112.710.6 8.45.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.83.30.50.10.40.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.00.00.00.00.00.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.22.12.70.60.51.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 17.821.413.210.7 8.86.0 LnGrp LOS BCBBAA Approach Vol, veh/h331 877 988 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.0 12.9 6.4 Approach LOS C B A Timer - Assigned Phs 12 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s10.122.5 32.6 14.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.06.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s11.039.0 56.0 22.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s3.910.6 8.5 7.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.25.9 6.8 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 11.1 HCM 6th LOS B ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 192 of 198 HCM 6th TWSC Kellogg Tract Development TIA 17: Edgefield Road & Site Access #1 2032 P3 Build AM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.5 Movement WBLWBRNBTNBRSBLSBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 11518370188117772 Future Vol, veh/h11518370188117772 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000 Sign ControlStopStopFreeFreeFreeFree RT Channelized-None-None-None Storage Length075-150150- Veh in Median Storage, #2-0--0 Grade, %0-0--0 Peak Hour Factor909090 90 9090 Heavy Vehicles, %222222 Mvmt Flow 12820377998130858 Major/MinorMinor1Major1Major2 Conflicting Flow All1468390008770 Stage 1 779----- Stage 2 689----- Critical Hdwy 6.846.94--4.14- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84----- Follow-up Hdwy3.523.32--2.22- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver~ 118609--766- Stage 1 413----- Stage 2 460----- Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver~ 98609--766- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver282----- Stage 1 413----- Stage 2 382----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v19.20 1.4 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTNBRWBLn1WBLn2SBLSBT Capacity (veh/h)--282609766- HCM Lane V/C Ratio --0.4530.3340.17- HCM Control Delay (s/veh)--27.913.810.7- HCM Lane LOS --DBB- HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)--2.21.50.6- Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 193 of 198 Queues Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2032 P3 Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Lane Group EBLEBTWBLWBTWBR NBTNBR SBLSBT Lane Group Flow (vph)12370938776483121433190 v/c Ratio 0.520.470.140.510.510.050.050.670.16 Control Delay (s/veh)21.712.112.212.7 3.4 28.5 0.3 23.5 3.6 Queue Delay 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 Total Delay (s/veh)21.712.112.212.7 3.4 28.5 0.3 23.5 3.6 Queue Length 50th (ft)2058566030690 Queue Length 95th (ft)871482716645210#20722 Internal Link Dist (ft)24061516 368 420 Turn Bay Length (ft)50 225 300 7575 Base Capacity (vph)4532882505289913757256826041274 Starvation Cap Reductn000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.270.250.080.270.350.020.020.550.07 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 194 of 198 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Kellogg Tract Development TIA 3: Ridgefield Drive/Site Access #2 & Belvedere Clearwater Road 2032 P3 Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Movement EBLEBTEBRWBLWBTWBR NBLNBTNBR SBLSBTSBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)111612263469843511013298081 Future Volume (veh/h)111612263469843511013298081 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln187018851870185618851870187018701870187018701870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h123680293877648312014331090 Peak Hour Factor 0.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.900.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %212312222222 Cap, veh/h 254169572368173576818701025240544 Arrive On Green 0.480.480.480.480.480.480.060.000.060.190.000.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 441350014973435821585130701585178101585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h1233483613877648312014331090 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln4411791185873417911585130701585178101585 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.7 8.68.72.49.9 15.7 0.60.00.6 11.3 0.02.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 27.6 8.68.7 11.1 9.9 15.7 0.60.00.6 11.3 0.02.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.081.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h254867900368173576818701025240544 V/C Ratio(X)0.480.400.400.100.450.630.060.000.140.630.000.17 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h29410301069434206091144204105400866 HCM Platoon Ratio1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.001.001.001.001.001.001.000.001.001.000.001.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.911.511.515.011.813.330.7 0.0 30.721.9 0.0 15.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.40.30.30.10.21.00.10.00.62.30.00.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.72.82.90.43.24.70.20.00.24.80.01.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 22.311.811.815.112.014.330.9 0.0 31.324.1 0.0 16.1 LnGrp LOS CBBBBBC CC B Approach Vol, veh/h 832 1297 26 421 Approach Delay, s/veh 13.3 13.0 31.1 22.4 Approach LOS B B C C Timer - Assigned Phs 234 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 39.719.410.5 39.7 29.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.06.06.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s40.014.018.0 40.0 38.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s29.613.3 2.6 17.7 4.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.00.10.0 7.4 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 14.8 HCM 6th LOS B ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 195 of 198 Queues Kellogg Tract Development TIA 17: Edgefield Road & Site Access #1 2032 P3 Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Lane Group WBLWBR NBTNBR SBLSBT Lane Group Flow (vph)1161701068154228964 v/c Ratio 0.430.440.710.200.600.41 Control Delay (s/veh)34.1 9.6 19.0 3.2 14.8 5.9 Queue Delay 0.00.00.00.00.00.0 Total Delay (s/veh)34.1 9.6 19.0 3.2 14.8 5.9 Queue Length 50th (ft)42017102976 Queue Length 95th (ft)1085329832102133 Internal Link Dist (ft)1039 561 1493 Turn Bay Length (ft)75 250250 Base Capacity (vph)497566220910464983118 Starvation Cap Reductn000000 Spillback Cap Reductn000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.230.300.480.150.460.31 Intersection Summary ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 196 of 198 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Kellogg Tract Development TIA 17: Edgefield Road & Site Access #1 2032 P3 Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Movement WBLWBR NBTNBR SBLSBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h)104153961139205868 Future Volume (veh/h)104153961139205868 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.001.00 1.001.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.001.001.001.001.001.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln187018701870187018701870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h1161701068154228964 Peak Hour Factor 0.900.900.900.900.900.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222 Cap, veh/h 26323415316833952274 Arrive On Green 0.150.150.430.430.100.64 Sat Flow, veh/h 178115853647158517813647 Grp Volume(v), veh/h1161701068154228964 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln178115851777158517811777 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.45.8 13.8 3.53.67.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.45.8 13.8 3.53.67.6 Prop In Lane 1.001.00 1.001.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h26323415316833952274 V/C Ratio(X)0.440.730.700.230.580.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h568505251711226543775 HCM Platoon Ratio1.001.001.001.001.001.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.001.001.001.001.001.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.923.013.110.110.2 5.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.24.20.60.21.30.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.00.00.00.00.00.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.42.34.41.01.01.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 23.127.213.710.311.5 5.2 LnGrp LOS CCBBBA Approach Vol, veh/h2861222 1192 Approach Delay, s/veh 25.6 13.2 6.4 Approach LOS C B A Timer - Assigned Phs 12 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s11.830.3 42.1 14.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.06.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s14.040.0 60.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s5.615.8 9.6 7.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.48.5 8.0 0.7 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay, s/veh 11.5 HCM 6th LOS B ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 197 of 198 HCM 6th TWSC Kellogg Tract Development TIA 17: Edgefield Road & Site Access #1 2032 P3 Build PM Peak Kimley-Horn Synchro 12 Report Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.4 Movement WBLWBRNBTNBRSBLSBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 104153961139205868 Future Vol, veh/h104153961139205868 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000 Sign ControlStopStopFreeFreeFreeFree RT Channelized-None-None-None Storage Length075-150150- Veh in Median Storage, #2-0--0 Grade, %0-0--0 Peak Hour Factor909090 90 9090 Heavy Vehicles, %222222 Mvmt Flow 1161701068154228964 Major/MinorMinor1Major1Major2 Conflicting Flow All20065340012220 Stage 1 1068----- Stage 2 938----- Critical Hdwy 6.846.94--4.14- Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84----- Follow-up Hdwy3.523.32--2.22- Pot Cap-1 Maneuver~ 52491--566- Stage 1 291----- Stage 2 341----- Platoon blocked, %--- Mov Cap-1 Maneuver~ 31491--566- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver159----- Stage 1 291----- Stage 2 204----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v38.703 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBTNBRWBLn1WBLn2SBLSBT Capacity (veh/h)--159491566- HCM Lane V/C Ratio --0.7270.3460.402- HCM Control Delay (s/veh)--71.916.215.6- HCM Lane LOS --FCC- HCM 95th %tile Q (veh)--4.41.51.9- Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon ATTACHMENT #9 - P&D STAFF REPORT Page 198 of 198 ORDINANCE 2025-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA IMPOSING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF ZONING COMPLIANCE, BUILDING PERMITS, DESIGN REVIEW APPROVALS, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVALS, SUBDIVISION APPROVALS, OR OTHER SIMILAR LAND USE OR CONSTRUCTION APPROVALS FOR ANY MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS . NOW THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of North Augusta (the “City Council”), the governing body of the City of North Augusta, South Carolina (the “City”), as follows: Section 1 Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact in connection with the enactment of this ordinance (this “Ordinance”): (a) The City Council is empowered pursuant to Section 5-7-30 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina 1976, as amended, to enact such regulations as are necessary for the security, general welfare, and convenience, of the City or for preserving health, peace, order, and good government within the City. The City Council is additionally empowered pursuant to Title 6, Chapter 29, Article 5 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina 1976, as amended (the “Act”), to enact regulations regarding land use within the City. (b) Pursuant to the Act, the City Council has enacted The North Augusta Development Code (the “Development Code”) which regulates development and land use within the City. The Development Code permits the use of property for Multi-Family Developments (as defined herein) in certain areas of the City. (c) The Development Code allows Multi-Family Developments as a “conditional use” in all commercial and mixed-use districts of the City which include, the Office Commercial, Neighborhood Commercial, General Commercial, Thoroughfare Commercial, Corridor Preservation, Downtown Mixed Use 1, and Downtown Mixed Use 2 areas of the City as well as the Mixed Residential (R-5) zoning district and the areas of some planned unit developments within the City. As a result, Multi-Family Developments are permitted in the vast majority of the area within the corporate limits of the City. (d) The City has experienced significant growth with a population increase of approximately 36% since 2000. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the City grew by approximately 13% from 2010 to 2020 and has grown by an additional 4% from 2020 to 2022, the most recent year for which population estimates are available. Rapid population growth has the potential to place undue strain on the City’s infrastructure, including water, sewer, and roads, and the City’s ability to continue providing high-quality municipal services such as police and fire protection. (e) The City currently has 36 residential projects in the design or development phase. These projects total 8714 new dwelling units of which 33%, or 2,883, are proposed to be multi- family. ATTACHMENT #10 - Amendment Page 1 of 4 (f) Due to the density of Multi-Family Developments have the potential to overburden the infrastructure and public services in specific areas of the City at a higher pace and to a greater degree than other types of residential development. The high percentage of the City in which Multi-Family Developments are a permitted use and the particular risks posed by Multi-Family Developments inhibits the City’s ability to engage in long-term planning to ensure that it is able to adequately provide infrastructure and public services to support development of this type. Moreover, second-order effects of rapid growth in isolated areas of the City may not be considered and mitigated under current requirements for traffic impact analyses and other development review procedures. (g) The overburdening of the City’s infrastructure and public services, including the City’s road system, has the potential to negatively impact the public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its citizens. The City Council has determined that these conditions present substantial risks to the public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its citizens. (h) In order to ensure that the regulations concerning Multi-Family Developments including the zoning districts under the Development Code where Multi-Family Developments are a permitted use or conditional use, are sufficient to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its citizens, the City Council has determined that it is necessary to review the applicable terms of the Development Code and consider amendments, new regulations, or rezoning to achieve these purposes. To give the City Council, the City of North Augusta Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”), and the City’s staff adequate time to conduct such a review and consider appropriate amendments, new regulations, or rezoning, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate to implement a temporary moratorium on approvals for Multi-Family Developments, as set forth in greater detail in Section 2 of this Ordinance. Section 2 Moratorium on Multi-Family Developments By and through the enactment of this Ordinance, the City Council hereby imposes a moratorium on the issuance of certificates of compliance, building permits, design review approvals, site development plan approvals, or other similar land use or construction approvals under the Development Code or other City ordinances until August 7, 2027. The City Council hereby declares that this Ordinance, and the moratorium imposed hereby, shall be subject to the “pending ordinance doctrine,” which shall be effective upon the first reading hereof and the publication of a notice of public hearing in connection herewith. Section 3 Exemptions: (a) Existing/ongoing planned developments (PDs), this exemption applies even though such planned developments or sites may not yet be fully built out. (b) Properties with approved development or site plans, even if development has not started. (c) City Council may approve additional planned developments during the moratorium which will be exempt. ATTACHMENT #10 - Amendment Page 2 of 4 Section 4 Recommendations Multi-Family Developments Development Regulations. During the pendency of the moratorium enacted hereby, City staff and the Planning Commission shall study the extent to which Multi-Family Developments are permitted within the various areas and neighborhoods of the City; the long-term effect on the City’s neighborhoods, citizens, and businesses of the proliferation of Multi-Family Developments within the City; appropriate amendments to the Development Code as may be necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its citizens; and whether it may be necessary to enact new regulations for Multi-Family Developments that may be essential to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the City and its citizens. Section 5 Severability. If any one or more of the provisions of this Ordinance should be contrary to law, then such provision shall be deemed severable from the remaining provisions and shall in no way affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance. Section 6 Repealer. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to affect any suit or proceeding pending in any court, or any rights acquired or liability incurred, or any cause of action acquired or existing, under any act or ordinance hereby repealed; nor shall any just or legal right or remedy of any character be lost, impaired or affected by this Ordinance, except as expressly set forth herein and as may be permitted under South Carolina law. Section 7 Inconsistency. All ordinances, resolutions or parts of any ordinances or resolutions inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict or inconsistency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of North Augusta, South Carolina, in meeting duly assembled and by the authority thereof that: I. City Council hereby imposes a moratorium on the issuance of certificates of compliance, building permits, design review approvals, site development plan approvals, or other similar land use or construction approvals under the Development Code or other City ordinances for Multi-Family Developments until August 7, 2027. However, Council reserves the right to reduce or extend such moratorium by a proper action of Council. II. City Council finds that the following are exempt from this moratorium: a) Existing/ongoing planned developments (PDs) and properties with vested rights. Planned developments already approved by Council are exempted from the effects of this moratorium, as Council carefully considered the uses and structures permitted ATTACHMENT #10 - Amendment Page 3 of 4 within these PDs, and hereby finds them compatible with desirable current and future growth. This exemption applies, even though such PDS may not yet be fully built out. b) Properties may have acquired vested rights under applicable laws. Accordingly, properties and/or property owners legally protected with such vested rights shall also be exempt from the effects of this moratorium to the extent they are lawfully protected by such vested rights. III. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed. IV. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption on second and final reading. DONE, RATIFIED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, ON THIS _________ DAY OF MARCH, 2025. First Reading: ________________ Second Reading: ______________ ________________________ Briton S. Williams, Mayor Attest: ________________________ Jamie Paul, City Clerk ATTACHMENT #10 - Amendment Page 4 of 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-02 ACCEPTING A DEED OF DEDICATION FOR THE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER, ALONG WITH A MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE AND CASH DEPOSIT, FOR PARKER’S KITCHEN WHEREAS, Drayton Parker Companies, LLC constructed a Parker’s Kitchen convenience store with gasoline sales at 5747 Jefferson Davis Highway according to the requirements of the North Augusta Development Code and the City, and including utility lines and associated easements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to §5.6.5 of the North Augusta Development Code, the Director of Planning and Development and the City Engineer approved the minor site plan for Parker’s Kitchen on July 3, 2023; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City that, upon completion of the improvements associated with an approved minor site plan, the City will, following inspection by the City's Engineering Department, accept a deed of dedication for the streets, utilities, etc. for the purpose of ownership and maintenance when said deed is accompanied by a maintenance guarantee; and WHEREAS, a maintenance guarantee and cash deposit accompany the deed, the City Engineer has made final inspection of the subject improvements, and these improvements meet City standards. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of North Augusta, South Carolina, in meeting duly assembled and by the authority thereof, do hereby accept a deed of dedication for: A non-exclusive easement in perpetuity for the use, repair, and maintenance of underground sewer lines on and under that property designated and described as “New 20’ Sanitary Sewer Easement” on that certain “Easement Plat for Dedication of Sanitary Sewer Easement to the City of North Augusta” prepared for the City of North Augusta, South Carolina by EMC Engineering Services, LLC, dated March 13, 2024 and recorded in the Aiken County RMC Office in Plat Book 64, Page 935 (hereinafter “Dedication Plat”); subject to the encroachment of Grantor’s grease trap into said New 20’ Sanitary Sewer Easement. TOGETHER WITH fee simple title to all sanitary sewer lines and apparatus located in, upon and under said New 20’ Sanitary Sewer Easement. AND TOGETHER WITH fee simple title to all water lines and apparatus constructed by Grantor in, upon and under that certain 40’ Access Easement, which easement is shown on said Dedication Plat. ATTACHMENT #11 Page 1 of 17 This being the same property conveyed to the Grantor by deed of Riverside Partners, LP dated May 19, 2023, recorded in the Aiken County RMC Office in Record Book 5091 at page 516-520. Tax Parcel Number 013-18-05-001 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a Maintenance Guarantee and Cash Deposit in the amount of $10,500.00 are hereby accepted. DONE, RATIFIED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, ON THIS ______ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025. Briton S. Williams, Mayor ATTEST: Jamie Paul, City Clerk ATTACHMENT #11 Page 2 of 17 AT T A C H M E N T #1 1 Pa g e 3 of 17 AT T A C H M E N T #1 1 Pa g e 4 of 17 AT T A C H M E N T #1 1 Pa g e 5 of 17 AT T A C H M E N T #1 1 Pa g e 6 of 17 AT T A C H M E N T #1 1 Pa g e 7 of 17 SIGNED, SEALED and DELIVERED IN THE PRESENCE OF 1st Witness 2nd Witness The City of North Augusta, South Carolina By:_________________________________________ Name: James S. Clifford As its: City Administrator [Seal] STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF AIKEN ) I, ,a Notary Public for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that on behalf of The City of North Augusta, South Carolina, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official seal this the day of ,2025. [Notarial Seal] Notary Public My commission expires: _______ ATTACHMENT #11 Page 8 of 17 AT T A C H M E N T #1 1 Pa g e 9 of 17 AT T A C H M E N T #1 1 Pa g e 10 of 17 AT T A C H M E N T #1 1 Pa g e 11 of 17 AT T A C H M E N T #1 1 Pa g e 12 of 17 AT T A C H M E N T #1 1 Pa g e 13 of 17 AT T A C H M E N T #1 1 Pa g e 14 of 17 AT T A C H M E N T #1 1 Pa g e 15 of 17 1/24/25, 10:11 AM ROD Documents https://www.aikencountysc.gov/View/?qID=1704361 1/2 ATTACHMENT #11 Page 16 of 17 1/24/25, 10:11 AM ROD Documents https://www.aikencountysc.gov/View/?qID=1704361 2/2 ATTACHMENT #11 Page 17 of 17 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-03 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA TO ENTER INTO PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACTS WITH MULTIPLE FIRMS TO PERFORM DESIGN SERVICES FOR VARIOUS STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WHEREAS, the City of North Augusta desires to retain the services of multiple engineering firm to provide on-call services related to the design of storm drainage improvement projects; and, WHEREAS, on December 2, 2024, a “Request for Qualifications for Engineering Services for Various Storm Drainage Improvement Projects” was advertised on the City of North Augusta’s Bids and Requests for Proposals website; and, WHEREAS, 9 firms submitted Statements of Qualifications, which were reviewed by a committee consisting of Director of Engineering & Public Works, Thomas Zeaser; Engineer II, Brian Maleck; Superintendent of Stormwater Management, Michaela Canady; and Director of Planning, Tommy Paradise; and WHEREAS, based upon the ranking of the firms, it has been determined that the following 3 firms should be engaged by contract for the purposes of performing such services: Benesch; Cranston; and Thomas & Hutton NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of North Augusta, South Carolina, in meeting duly assembled and by the authority thereof, that the City is authorized to enter into professional engineering services contracts with the above listed firms for the provision of storm drainage engineering services. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator is authorized to execute such documents as necessary to enter into said contracts. DONE, RATIFIED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, ON THIS ____ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025. Briton S. Williams, Mayor ATTEST: Jamie Paul, City Clerk ATTACHMENT #12 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT #12 - ENGINEERING INFORMATION Page 1 of 2 ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SELECTION COMMITTEE RANKING January 27, 2025 Reviewer A Reviewer B Reviewer C Reviewer D Benesch 2 1 2 4 31 2 Bowman 7 8 8 7 10 8 Chao & Associates 9 9 9 9 4 9 Cranston 1 4 1 1 33 1 EMC Engineering 8 7 3 6 16 7 Kimley-Horn 3 5 6 3 23 4 Johnson Lashcober and Associates 6 3 7 2 22 5 Michael Baker 4 6 5 8 17 6 Thomas & Hutton 5 2 4 5 24 3 Individual RankingsCompany Name Total Points Ranking AT T A C H M E N T #1 2 - EN G I N E E R I N G IN F O R M A T I O N Pa g e 2 of 2 CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT AND AMENDMENT OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE BALLPARK VILLAGE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND CONFIRMING THE COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS THEREIN FOR THE 2024-2025 ASSESSMENT YEAR ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA FEBRUARY 3, 2025 ATTACHMENT #13 Page 1 of 4 RESOLUTION 2025-04 APPROVING THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT AND AMENDMENT OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE BALLPARK VILLAGE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND CONFIRMING THE COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS THEREIN FOR THE 2024-2025 ASSESSMENT YEAR The City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of North Augusta, South Carolina (the “City”), hereby finds and determines: WHEREAS, The Ballpark Village Municipal Improvement District (the “Improvement District”), located in the City of North Augusta was created by the City Council pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act, Title 5, Chapter 37, Code of Laws of South Carolina 1976, as amended (the “Act”), through an ordinance enacted on February 6, 2017, wherein the Improvement District was created and special assessments (the “Assessment” or “Assessments”) were authorized to be imposed and collected (the “Assessment Ordinance”); and WHEREAS, certain capitalized terms undefined herein have such meanings as set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Assessment, Appendix A of the Assessment Roll (the “Rate and Method”), which was approved by the Assessment Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Assessments have been imposed on the Assessed Property within the Improvement District pursuant to the Act and the Assessment Ordinance. The Assessment, including the Annual Parcel Assessment, the Annual Parcel Credit and the Annual Payment for each Parcel, is recorded on the Assessment Roll, attached hereto as Appendix B-1 and Appendix B-2 of the Annual Assessment Report and Amendment of the Assessment Roll for 2024-2025 Assessment Year (the “Annual Assessment Report”) attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is being updated in accordance with the Rate and Method, as detailed below, through City Council’s approval of the Annual Assessment Report; and WHEREAS, pursuant to a Resolution of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the North Augusta Public Facilities Corporation (the “Corporation”) adopted by the Board on February 20 2017, the Corporation issued its $69,450,000 Installment Purchase Revenue Bonds, Taxable Series 2017B, dated May 16, 2017 (the “Series 2017B Bonds”), in order to obtain a portion of the funds necessary to defray the cost of the Public Improvements. Simultaneously with the issuance of the Series 2017B Bonds, the City issued its $43,412,000 Tax Increment Revenue Obligation, Series 2017A to the Corporation (the “2017 TIF Obligation”). By Ordinance enacted on February 6, 2017, the City Council approved the issuance of the Series 2017B Bonds and the 2017 TIF Obligation. Debt service requirements of the Series 2017B Bond will be paid from Available Sources (as that term is defined in the Official Statement dated May 2, 2017 (the “Official Statement”) relating to the Series 2017 Bonds), which include TIF Revenues (as defined in the Official Statement) and Assessments. Payments to the Corporation by the City pursuant to the 2017 TIF Obligation shall constitute a dollar for dollar credit against the City’s obligation to make Base Payments (as defined in the Official Statement); and WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the collection of the Assessments, the City shall update Appendix B-1 and B-2 of the Assessment Roll each Assessment Year to reflect (i) the current Parcels in the Improvement District, (ii) the Assessment for each Parcel, including any adjustments to the Assessment as provided for in Section C of the Rate and Method; (iii) the Annual Assessment; (iv) the Annual Parcel Assessment for each Parcel, (v) the Annual Payment to be collected from each ATTACHMENT #13 Page 2 of 4 2 Parcel for the current Assessment Year, (vi) prepayments of the Assessment as provided for in the Annual Assessment Report, and (vii) termination of the Assessment as provided for in the Annual Assessment Report; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received the Annual Assessment Report, prepared by MuniCap, Inc., the Administrator of the Improvement District, in accordance with the Rate and Method. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council for the City of North Augusta, in meeting duly assembled and by the authority thereof that: I. The Annual Assessment Report is hereby approved. II. The Rate and Method provides for the annual collection of the Annual Payment. As shown by the Annual Assessment Report, the sum of the Annual Payment for all Parcels in the Improvement District for the 2024-2025 Assessment Year is $736,522.70 The billing of the Assessments to be collected from each Parcel as indicated in the Annual Assessment Report for the 2024-2025 Assessment Year is hereby confirmed. III. This resolution shall become effective as of the date hereof. DONE, RATIFIED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, ON THIS 3rd DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025. CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA Briton S. Williams, Mayor ATTEST: Jamie Paul, City Clerk ATTACHMENT #13 Page 3 of 4 STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF AIKEN I, the undersigned, Clerk to City Council of the City of North Augusta, South Carolina (“City Council”), DO HEREBY CERTIFY: That the foregoing constitutes a true, correct and verbatim copy of a resolution (the “Resolution”) adopted by the City Council of the City (the “City Council”), on February 3, 2025. At such meeting, a quorum of the City Council was present and remained present throughout the meeting. Notice was previously given pursuant to and in conformity with Chapter 4, Title 30 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina 1976, as amended (the Freedom of Information Act). At least 24 hours prior to the commencement of such meeting, the agenda for such meeting, showing the time and place of the meeting and including as an item the consideration of the Resolution, was posted in the administrative offices of the City, posted on the City’s public website, and provided to news media and other persons requesting such notification. The original of the Resolution is duly entered in the permanent records of the City, in my custody as Clerk. The Resolution is now of full force and effect, and has not been modified, amended or repealed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my Hand and the Seal of the City, this 3rd day of February 2025. Jamie Paul, City Clerk City of North Augusta, South Carolina ATTACHMENT #13 Page 4 of 4 BALLPARK VILLAGE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT AND AMENDMENT OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR 2024-2025 ASSESSMENT YEAR Prepared By: MUNICAP, INC. January 3, 2025 ATTACHMENT #13 - MID ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Page 1 of 11 1 Ballpark Village Municipal Improvement District City of North Augusta, South Carolina Annual Assessment Report and Amendment of the Assessment Roll for 2024-2025 Assessment Year INTRODUCTION The Ballpark Village Municipal Improvement District (the “Improvement District”), located in the City of North Augusta, South Carolina (the “City”), was created by Ordinance No. 2016-23 (the “Improvement District Ordinance”) enacted by the City Council of the City of North Augusta (the “City Council”) on February 6, 2017. The Improvement District Ordinance also authorized the imposition of the Assessment(s) on the Assessed Property within the Improvement District and approved an Assessment Roll listing the parcels in the Improvement District and the amount of the Assessment imposed upon each such parcel. As more fully explained in the Report on the Reasonable Basis of the Special Assessment, approved by the Improvement District Ordinance, the Assessments were set to equal estimated tax increment finance revenues from the parcels of real property within the Improvement District. To defray the costs of public improvements to be provided for the Improvement District, the North Augusta Public Facilities Corporation (the “Corporation”) issued its $69,450,000 installment purchase revenue bonds on May 16, 2017 (the “Series 2017B Bonds”), pursuant to a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted on February 20, 2017. Simultaneously with the issuance of the Series 2017B Bonds, the City issued its $43,412,000 tax increment financing obligation to the Corporation (the “2017 TIF Obligation”). The 2017 TIF Obligation constitutes a Borrowing as that term is defined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Assessment, Appendix A of the Assessment Roll (the “Rate and Method”). By Ordinance enacted on February 6, 2017, the City Council approved the issuance of the Series 2017B Bonds and the 2017 TIF Obligation and authorized the City to enter into the various documents and instruments necessary to effectuate the issuance by the Corporation of the Series 2017B Bonds and by the City of the 2017 TIF Obligation. The City previously established a tax increment finance district (the “TIF District”) in accordance with Title 31, Chapter 6 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina 1976, as amended, which is also known as the Tax Increment Financing Law. The TIF District encompasses approximately 457 acres, including the Improvement District. Pursuant to the Tax Increment Financing Law, the private projects in the Improvement District and other private projects within the TIF District are expected to produce annual tax increment financing district revenues (“TIF Revenues”) for the City that will secure the 2017 TIF Obligation. In consideration for the Corporation issuing the Series 2017B Bonds and entering into the documents related thereto, the City issued the 2017 TIF Obligation to the Corporation, and the Corporation in turn assigned all right, title and interest in the 2017 TIF Obligation to the trustee for the Series 2017B Bonds, which assignment caused the 2017 TIF Obligation to become part of the security for the Series 2017B Bonds. In accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the documents relating to the Series 2017B Bonds, each payment by the City of TIF Revenues pursuant to the 2017 TIF Obligation shall constitute dollar for dollar credit against the City’s obligation to make payments under the documents relating the Series 2017B Bonds. The Assessments shall be billed on an annual basis in accordance with the Rate and Method. Pursuant to the Rate and Method, the Assessments on each Parcel within the Improvement District ATTACHMENT #13 - MID ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Page 2 of 11 2 are due and payable each year as the Annual Parcel Assessment. The sum of the Annual Parcel Assessment for all Parcels equals the Annual Assessment. The Annual Assessment for each year is shown in the updated Appendix B-2 of the Assessment Roll, attached to this report. Pursuant to the Rate and Method, the portion of the Annual Parcel Assessment to be billed and collected shall be calculated in each Assessment Year. In general, as further described below, in each Assessment Year the Annual Parcel Credit shall be subtracted from the Annual Parcel Assessment for each Parcel; the resulting amount shall equal the Annual Payment, which is to be billed and collected from the Assessed Property in the Improvement District. The Annual Parcel Assessment, the Annual Parcel Credit and the Annual Payment for each Parcel are shown in the updated Appendix B-1 of the Assessment Roll, attached to this report. In order to facilitate the collection of the Assessment, the City shall update Appendix B-1 and B-2 of the Assessment Roll each Assessment Year to reflect (i) the current Parcels in the Improvement District, (ii) the Assessment for each Parcel, including any adjustments to the Assessment as provided for in Section C; (iii) the Annual Assessment; (iv) the Annual Parcel Assessment for each Parcel, (v) the Annual Payment to be collected from each Parcel for the current Assessment Year, (vi) prepayments of the Assessment as provided for herein, and (vii) termination of the Assessment as provided for herein. This report has been prepared to meet these requirements for the 2024–2025 Assessment Year. Through its approval of this report, City Council is confirming the Annual Payment and the updated Assessment Roll. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are defined in the Rate and Method. I - CURRENT PARCELS IN THE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Based on information known to the City, no additional Parcels were created in calendar year 2023. The updated Appendix B-1, attached to this report, lists the Parcels in the Improvement District for which the Annual Payment for the 2024-2025 Assessment Year may be billed. The City is also unaware of any real property parcels created from subdivisions in calendar year 2024. To the extent that any Parcels were created in 2024, such Parcels will be added to the Assessment Roll for the 2025-2026 Assessment Year. II - ASSESSMENT ON EACH PARCEL The Assessment for each Parcel is shown on Appendix B-1, attached to this report. The Assessment on each Parcel shown on Appendix B-1 has been updated in accordance with the Rate and Method. In particular, the Assessment on each Parcel is reduced by the amount of the Annual Parcel Assessment for the Parcel for the prior Assessment Year. All Annual Payments from prior years have been collected. III - ANNUAL ASSESSMENT The Annual Assessment for each Assessment Year is shown on Appendix B-2, attached to this report. As indicated above, the Annual Assessment is the sum of the Annual Parcel Assessment for all Parcels in the Improvement District. For the 2024-2025 Assessment Year, the Annual Assessment equals $1,686,753.35, as shown on Appendix B-2. ATTACHMENT #13 - MID ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Page 3 of 11 3 IV - ANNUAL PARCEL ASSESSMENT FOR EACH PARCEL The Annual Parcel Assessment for each Parcel for the 2024-2025 Assessment Year is shown on Appendix B-1, attached to this report. The Annual Parcel Assessment for the Parcels for 2024- 2025 Assessment Year, which are shown on Appendix B-1, are generally consistent with the amounts specified in the original Assessment Roll, with updates for prior allocations of the Assessments resulting from prior subdivisions of the Parcels. V - ANNUAL PAYMENT The Annual Payment for each Parcel for the 2024-2025 Assessment Year is shown on Appendix B-1, attached to this report. The Annual Payment is defined in the Rate and Method as follows: “The Annual Payment means for each Parcel, the portion of the Annual Parcel Assessment to be collected each Assessment Year calculated as provided for in Section D.” As specified in Section D of the Rate and Method, the Annual Payment is calculated as follows: “First Step: The Administrator shall calculate the Annual Revenue Requirement. If the Annual Revenue Requirement is less than the Annual Assessment, the Annual Parcel Assessment on every Parcel shall be decreased on a pro-rated basis such that the Annual Assessment equals the Annual Revenue Requirement. Second Step: The Administrator shall calculate the Tax Revenues for each Parcel in the Improvement District. If the sum of the Tax Revenues for all Parcels is greater than or equal to the Annual Assessment, then the Annual Payment for all Parcels shall equal zero ($0.00). Third step: If the sum of the Tax Revenues for all Parcels is less than the Annual Assessment, then the Annual Payment for each Parcel shall equal Parcel’s Annual Parcel Assessment less the Parcel’s Annual Parcel Credit.” The remainder of this Section V describes the calculation of the Annual Payment pursuant to steps described above. First Step As indicated above, the first step in the calculation of the Annual Payment is to compare the Annual Revenue Requirement to the Annual Assessment. The Annual Assessment equals $1,686,753.35. The Annual Revenue Requirement is defined in the Rate and Method as follows: “The Annual Revenue Requirement means for any Assessment Year, the sum of the following: (1) Debt Service Expenses and (2) Administrative Expenses; less the sum of Other Available Funds and Other Ballpark Village Revenues.” Table A below provides a calculation of the Annual Revenue Requirement for the 2024– 2025 Assessment Year. Each of these numbers is explained in the following sections. ATTACHMENT #13 - MID ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Page 4 of 11 4 Table A Annual Revenue Requirement 2024-2025 Debt Service Expenses Series 2017 TIF Obligation Interest payment on April 15, 2025 $1,025,202.50 Interest payment on October 15, 2025 $1,025,202.50 Principal payment on October 15, 2025 $505,000.00 Subtotal Debt Service Expenses $2,555,405.00 Administrative Expenses $50,000.00 Subtotal expenses $2,605,405.00 Other Available Funds $0.00 Other Ballpark Village Revenues $0.00 Subtotal of available funds $0.00 Annual Revenue Requirement $2,605,405.00 Debt Service Expenses Debt service includes the semi-annual interest payments due on the 2017 TIF Obligation on April 15, 2025 and on October 15, 2025. The interest payment on the 2017 TIF Obligation due on April 15, 2025 is $1,025,202.50 and the interest payment on the 2017 TIF Obligation due on October 15, 2025 is $1,025.202.50. There is a principal payment in the amount of $505,000.00 due for the 2017 Obligation on October 15, 2025. As a result, total debt service on the 2017 TIF Obligation is $2,555,405.00. Administrative Expenses Administrative Expenses is defined in the Rate and Method as follows: “Administrative Expenses means the actual or budgeted costs, as applicable, directly related to the administration of the Improvement District, which may include but are not limited to the following: the costs of computing the Annual Payments; the costs of collecting the Annual Payments (whether by the City or otherwise); the costs of the Administrator in the discharge of their duties; the costs of the City of complying with arbitrage rebate requirements; the costs of the City of complying with securities disclosure requirements; and any other costs of the City in any way related to the administration and operation of the Improvement District, including, without limitation, the costs of legal counsel and other consultants and advisors, and costs related to commencing foreclosure and pursuing collection of delinquent Annual Payments, including contingencies and reserves for Administrative Expense as deemed appropriate by the City Council.” Estimated Administrative Expenses include payments to the trustee of the Series 2017B Bonds, payments to the administrator of the Improvement District, legal fees for the Improvement ATTACHMENT #13 - MID ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Page 5 of 11 5 District and miscellaneous expenses for the administration of the Improvement District, including but not limited to expenses related to the collection of the Annual Payment and other expenses of the City. The annual charges of the trustee are estimated to be $5,000.00. The estimated annual total of the Administrative Expenses from the administrator of the Improvement District and from attorneys which assist the City with the Improvement District is $40,000.00. Miscellaneous Administrative Expenses are estimated to be $5,000.00. Accordingly, total Administrative Expenses for the 2024-2025 Assessment Year are estimated to be $50,000.00. Other Available Funds Other Available Funds is defined in the Rate and Method as follows: “Other Available Funds means capitalized interest, interest earnings on any trust account in connection with the Borrowings and any other funds deposited to a trust account in connection with the Borrowings that are available to meet the Annual Revenue Requirement in any given Assessment Year.” The City has indicated that as of January 3, 2025, there are no other funds available to meet the Annual Revenue Requirement and therefore Other Available Funds equals zero ($0.00). Other Ballpark Village Revenues Other Ballpark Village Revenues is defined in the Rate and Method as follows: “Other Ballpark Village Revenues means legally available funds determined on an annual basis potentially beginning in the 6th Assessment Year that result from parcels of real property or activity within the Improvement District and are designated as “Other Ballpark Village Revenues” by City Council, in its sole discretion, by resolution to meet the Annual Revenue Requirement in any given Assessment Year.” The City has indicated that as of January 3, 2025, City Council has not designated any funds as Other Ballpark Village Revenues for the 2024-2025 Assessment Year and therefore Other Ballpark Village Revenues equals zero ($0.00). As shown in Table B above, the Annual Revenue Requirement equals $2,605,405. This amount is greater than the Annual Assessment of $1,686,753.35. As such, the potential resulting action of the first step (to reduce the Annual Parcel Assessment on a pro rata basis, as explained above) is not implemented. Second Step As indicated above, the second step in the calculation of the Annual Payment is to compare the sum of the Tax Revenues for all Parcels to the Annual Assessment. The Annual Assessment equals $1,686,753.35. Tax Revenues is defined in the Rate and Method as follows: “Tax Revenues means for each Parcel the actual or estimated annual real property tax revenues expected to be collected for the specific Assessment Year and available to be applied to the repayment of the Borrowings, ATTACHMENT #13 - MID ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Page 6 of 11 6 pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and as described in the Development Agreement. The calculation of the Tax Revenues for each Parcel will exclude (1) any deductions for the base assessed value of the tax increment finance district or the base assessed value of the Parcel or the Parcel’s parent parcel at the creation of the tax increment finance district and (2) other tax revenues that are not available for the Redevelopment Plan.” The calculation of the Tax Revenues for each parcel is shown in Appendix C, attached to this report. As further explained on Appendix C, the calculation of the Tax Revenues utilizes the following information:  The assessed value of the Parcels as provided by the Aiken County Tax Assessor  A total millage rate of $0.2794 per $1 of assessed value. As shown in Appendix C, the sum of the Tax Revenues for all Parcels equals $1,504,644.71, which is less than the Annual Assessment of $1,686,753.35. As such, the potential result of the second step (that the Annual Payment for all Parcels equals zero) is not implemented. Third Step Following the determination made above for the second step, the third step in the calculation of the Annual Payment is required. The third step is to subtract the Annual Parcel Credit from the Annual Parcel Assessment for each Parcel. The Annual Parcel Credit is defined in the Rate and Method as follows: “Annual Parcel Credit means for each Parcel in each Assessment Year the Parcel’s Tax Revenues; provided, however, that the Annual Parcel Credit for a Parcel in any Assessment Year shall not exceed the Parcel’s Annual Parcel Assessment.” Appendix C provides the Annual Parcel Credit for each Parcel, as well as a calculation of the Annual Payment for the 2024–2025 Assessment Year for each Parcel. As shown on Appendix C, the Annual Parcel Credit equals the Annual Parcel Assessment for six Parcels (the Parcels identified by Aiken County as 007-14-19-001, 007-17-02-003, 007-18-05-004, 007-18-05-006, 007-18-05-007 and 007-18-05-008) (and excluding all Parcels for which the Annual Parcel Assessment equals zero), which results in an Annual Payment of zero ($0.00) for these six Parcels. As shown on Appendix C, the sum of the Annual Payment for all Parcels in the Improvement District equals $736,522.70, which is distributed amongst thirteen Parcels. The Annual Payment to be billed and collected from the thirteen Parcels of Assessed Property in the Improvement District (as described above and shown on Appendix C), shall be billed on the City’s annual real property tax bill and collected by the City as the property owner makes payment of the entire amount due (inclusive of the Annual Payment), as indicated on the real property tax bill. VI - PREPAYMENTS OF THE ASSESSMENT As of the date of this report, there has been no prepayment of the Assessment. VII - TERMINATION OF THE ASSESSMENT The Rate and Method specifies the following regarding the termination of the Assessment. ATTACHMENT #13 - MID ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Page 7 of 11 7 “Except for any delinquent Annual Payments and related penalties and interest, the Assessment on each Parcel may not be collected for a term exceeding the earlier of (a) the final maturity of the Borrowings and (b) the date on which such Assessment is prepaid in full as provided for herein.” The final maturity of the 2017 TIF Obligation is October 15, 2046. As indicated above, there have been no prepayments of the Assessment. As such, there has been no termination of the Assessment on any Parcel. CONCLUSION Appendix B-1, Appendix B-2 and Appendix C are shown on the following pages. There is no Appendix A. ATTACHMENT #13 - MID ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Page 8 of 11 2024-2025 Assessment Year Annual Annual Parcel Parcel Annual Parcel Tract Assessment1 Assessment Credit Payment 007-17-02-001 ROW $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-18-05-003 A $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-18-05-002 A1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-18-05-004 A2 $433,311.58$18,599.56 ($18,599.56)$0.00 007-18-05-005 Out of A1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-18-05-006 Out of A1 $672,415.58$28,862.92 ($28,862.92)$0.00 007-18-05-007 Out of A1 $110,122.65$4,726.93 ($4,726.93)$0.00 007-18-05-008 Out of A1 $2,349,283.24$100,841.16 ($100,841.16)$0.00 007-14-19-001 B $1,432,859.51$61,504.38 ($61,504.38)$0.00 007-18-05-009 Out of B $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-14-19-003 B1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-14-19-002 B2 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-14-19-005 C $3,295,419.43$141,453.32 ($11,568.82)$129,884.50 007-14-19-004 C1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-14-19-007 D $1,999,454.79$72,244.87 ($8,003.16)$64,241.71 007-14-19-006 D1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-13-42-002 E $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-13-42-001 E1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-17-02-005 Out of F $9,170,300.83$393,628.04 ($325,377.14)$68,250.89 007-18-07-001 Out of F $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-17-02-008 G $1,257,032.74$50,870.75 ($3,954.08)$46,916.67 007-18-06-001 G1 $19,116.69 $820.57 ($25.15)$795.42 007-17-02-006 Out of H $262,543.09$7,558.54 ($4,049.09)$3,509.46 007-17-02-009 Out of H $87,514.37$2,519.51 ($1,760.47)$759.04 007-17-02-010 Out of H $87,514.37$2,519.51 ($1,928.14)$591.38 007-17-02-011 Out of H $87,514.37$2,519.51 ($1,928.14)$591.38 007-17-02-012 Out of H $87,514.37$2,519.51 ($1,928.14)$591.38 007-17-02-013 Out of H $87,514.37$2,519.51 ($1,928.14)$591.38 007-17-02-004 I $700,114.91$20,156.11 ($1,662.67)$18,493.44 007-17-02-003 J $8,180,563.38$351,144.32 ($351,144.32)$0.00 007-13-42-003 K $9,825,322.36$421,744.33 ($20,438.24)$401,306.08 007-13-42-004 K1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-18-05-001 L $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-17-02-007 L1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-17-01-001 Riverfront strip $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land owned by SC DOT $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $40,145,432.63 $1,686,753.35 ($950,230.65)$736,522.73 Ballpark Village Municipal Improvement District City of North Augusta, South Carolina Appendix B-1 ASSESSMENT PER PARCEL ATTACHMENT #13 - MID ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Page 9 of 11 Ballpark Village Municipal Improvement District City of North Augusta, South Carolina Appendix B-2 ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS Annual Assessment 2024-2025 $1,686,753.35 2025-2026 $1,686,753.35 2026-2027 $1,939,766.35 2027-2028 $1,939,766.35 2028-2029 $1,939,766.35 2029-2030 $1,939,766.35 2030-2031 $1,939,766.35 2031-2032 $2,230,731.31 2032-2033 $2,230,731.31 2033-2034 $2,230,731.31 2034-2035 $1,171,030.08 2035-2036 $1,171,030.08 2036-2037 $1,346,684.59 2037-2038 $1,346,684.59 2038-2039 $1,346,684.59 2039-2040 $1,346,684.59 2040-2041 $1,346,684.59 2041-2042 $1,548,687.28 2042-2043 $1,548,687.28 2043-2044 $1,548,687.28 2044-2045 $1,548,687.28 2045-2046 $1,548,687.28 2046-2047 $1,780,990.37 2047-2048 $1,780,990.37 Total $40,145,432.63 Assessment Year ATTACHMENT #13 - MID ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Page 10 of 11 Appendix C to Annual Assessment Report for the 2023-2024 Assessment Year Ballpark Village Municipal Improvement District City of North Augusta, South Carolina CALCULATION OF TAX REVENUES AND ANNUAL PAYMENT Annual Parcel AppraisedIncremental Annual Annual Parcel Tract Assessment Value1 Assessed Value2 Millage3 Tax Revenues Parcel Credit Payment 007-17-02-001 ROW $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-18-05-003 A $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-18-05-002 A1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-18-05-004 A2 $18,599.56$1,659,500.00$99,570.00$0.2794$27,823.84 $18,599.56 $0.00 007-18-05-005 Out of A1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-18-05-006 Out of A1$28,862.92$2,233,820.00$134,030.00$0.2794$37,453.34 $28,862.92 $0.00 007-18-05-007 Out of A1 $4,726.93$823,310.00$49,400.00$0.2794$13,804.34 $4,726.93 $0.00 007-18-05-008 Out of A1$100,841.16$8,327,370.00$499,640.00$0.2794$139,619.40 $100,841.16 $0.00 007-14-19-001 B $61,504.38$8,963,510.00$537,810.00$0.2794$150,285.63 $61,504.38 $0.00 007-18-05-009 Out of B $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-14-19-003 B1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-14-19-002 B2 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-14-19-005 C $141,453.32$690,000.00$41,400.00$0.2794$11,568.82 $11,568.82$129,884.50 007-14-19-004 C1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-14-19-007 D $72,244.87$477,250.00$28,640.00$0.2794$8,003.16 $8,003.16 $64,241.71 007-14-19-006 D1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-13-42-002 E $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-13-42-001 E1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-17-02-005 Out of F$393,628.04$19,406,560.00$1,164,390.00$0.2794$325,377.14 $325,377.14 $68,250.90 007-18-07-001 Out of F $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-17-02-008 G $50,870.75$235,750.00$14,150.00$0.2794$3,954.08 $3,954.08 $46,916.67 007-18-06-001 G1 $820.57 $1,500.00 $90.00$0.2794 $25.15 $25.15 $795.42 007-17-02-006 Out of H $7,558.54$241,500.00$14,490.00$0.2794$4,049.09 $4,049.09 $3,509.45 007-17-02-009 Out of H $2,519.51$105,000.00$6,300.00$0.2794$1,760.47 $1,760.47 $759.04 007-17-02-010 Out of H $2,519.51$115,000.00$6,900.00$0.2794$1,928.14 $1,928.14 $591.37 007-17-02-011 Out of H $2,519.51$115,000.00$6,900.00$0.2794$1,928.14 $1,928.14 $591.37 007-17-02-012 Out of H $2,519.51$115,000.00$6,900.00$0.2794$1,928.14 $1,928.14 $591.37 007-17-02-013 Out of H $2,519.51$115,000.00$6,900.00$0.2794$1,928.14 $1,928.14 $591.37 007-17-02-004 I $20,156.11 $99,190.00$5,950.00$0.2794$1,662.67 $1,662.67 $18,493.44 007-17-02-003 J $351,144.32$44,798,250.00$2,687,900.00$0.2794$751,106.78 $351,144.32 $0.00 007-13-42-003 K $421,744.33$1,219,000.00$73,140.00$0.2794$20,438.24 $20,438.24$401,306.09 007-13-42-004 K1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-18-05-001 L $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-17-02-007 L1 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 007-17-01-001Riverfront strip $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land owned by SC DOT $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.2794 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $1,686,753.35 $89,741,510.00 $5,384,500.00 $1,504,644.71 $950,230.65 $736,522.70 1 As indicated on an Aiken County website on January 2, 2025 (excluding City owned parcels which are shown here to have an appraised value of zero). 2 Reflects the assessed value of the parcel as indicated on an Aiken County website on January 2, 2025 (excluding City owned parcels which are shown here to have an assessed value of zero); in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Assessment, the parcel's assessed value will equal the parcel's incremental assessed value. 3 Provided by the City of North Augusta and reflective of the 2024 tax year millage for Aiken County, Aiken County School District and the City of North Augusta. ATTACHMENT #13 - MID ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Page 11 of 11 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-05 AUTHORIZING EXTENSIONS OF AWARDED ALLOCATION OF THE ACCOMMODATIONS TAX ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE DISBURSEMENT OF REVENUES FROM THE ACCOMMODATIONS TAX YEAR 2022-2023 WHEREAS, the City of North Augusta receives state accommodations tax funding from the state of South Carolina; and WHEREAS, the City receives more than fifty thousand dollars in state accommodations taxes and pursuant to Section 6-4-25 Code of Laws of South Carolina, formed a local advisory committee consisting of seven members via Resolution 2019-32 and updated via Resolution 2020- 45; and WHEREAS, Section 6-4-10(4) provides, in part, that the funds received by a municipality collecting more than fifty thousand dollars from the state accommodations tax must allocate the remaining balance, after statutory directed allocations to the General Fund and advertising and promotion funds, to the special fund to use for tourism related expenditures; and WHEREAS, City Council adopted Resolution 2023-48, which authorized funding be allocated as recommended by the local accommodations tax advisory committee and that the funding source be the Accommodations Tax Fund for tax year 2022-2023; and WHEREAS, the local accommodations tax advisory committee met and reviewed the extension letters and voted to recommend the funding allocations be extended through the tax year 2023-2024 attached hereto, marked as Exhibit A for Council’s consideration; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council for the City of North Augusta, in meeting duly assembled and by the authority thereof that funding allocation be extended as recommended by the local accommodations tax advisory committee and that the funding source be the Accommodations Tax Fund for tax year 2022-2023. DONE, RATIFIED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, ON THIS ______ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025. Briton S. Williams, Mayor ATTEST: Jamie Paul, City Clerk ATTACHMENT #14 Page 1 of 2 Reimburse by 12/31/24 Organization Account 2024 Request 2024 Budget FY24 Reimb 1 Aiken County - Langley Pond Regatta 4325 1,147.00$ 1,147.00$ Processed 2 Living History Park - Advertising-Promotion 4325 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ Requested Extension 3 North Augusta Forward - Downtown 4325 20,000.00$ 10,000.00$ Requested Extension 4 North Augusta Forward - Friends of the Greeneway 4325 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ Requested Extension 5 Parks & Recreation - Jack-O-Lantern Jubilee 4325 35,000.00$ 35,000.00$ Processed 6 Parks & Recreation - Peach Jam Hospitality 4325 18,250.00$ 18,250.00$ Processed 7 Tourism - Riverfront Board Room 4325 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ Requested Extension 8 Parks & Recreation - Activities Center Gym Floors Refinishing 4325 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$ Requested Extension 9 Tourism - Sharon Jones Amphitheater Concert Series 4325 25,000.00$ 12,206.24$ Processed TOTAL 177,397.00$ 154,603.24$ -$ 154,603.24$ (66,603.24)$ Processed as of 12/31/24 Total Amount of Extension to be spent by 12-31-2025 -$ 88,000.00$ To be Extended to payout in FY2025 To be paid out by December 31, 2024 $ 66,603.24 Funds spent by 12-31-24 FY 2022-23 A-Tax Awarded Grant List EXHIBIT A AT T A C H M E N T #1 4 Pa g e 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-06 RELATING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT; AUTHORIZING A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA PARKS, RECREATION & TOURISM DEPARTMENT FOR FEDERAL FUNDING ASSISTANCE TO SUPPORT A PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER THE RECREATION TRAILS PROGRAM (RTP) UNDER THE APPROVAL OF THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA) WHEREAS, under the provisions of RTP, federal funding assistance is requested to aid in financing the cost of the North Augusta Greeneway Palmetto Parkway Trailhead Project; and WHEREAS, Parks & Recreation believes that this project meets the stated criteria for grant funding under the terms established by the State of South Carolina Parks, Recreation & Tourism Department (SCPRT), and any funding received from SCPRT will be used for the implementation of the referenced project; and WHEREAS, the City of North Augusta acknowledges that SCPRT grants, if approved, will be paid on a reimbursement basis, meaning that the City may request payment only after eligible and allowable costs have already been paid and remitted to vendors; and WHEREAS, the City owns the site and intends to develop or improve a portion of the property for recreational purposes; and WHEREAS, any funds received from the SCPRT will be used for the sole purpose stated in the City's grant applications to SCPRT; and WHEREAS, the City acknowledges that RTP grants are federal funds and, as such, the City must comply with all applicable federal laws; and WHEREAS, this Resolution becomes a part of a formal application to SCPRT. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, THE MAYOR CONCURRING, THAT: The Director of Parks & Recreation or his designee, is hereby authorized to submit applications for and on behalf of the City of North Augusta, in such counterparts as are necessary, to the State of South Carolina Parks, Recreation & Tourism Department, for financial assistance in the amount set forth in the "Grant Request" column below: Proposed Projects SCPRT Program Category Grant Request Match Total North Augusta Greeneway Palmetto Park Trailhead RTP $100,000 $25,000 $125,000 ATTACHMENT #15 Page 1 of 2 The $100,000 of SCPRT grants requires an 80/20 match. The funding source for the $25,000 City of North Augusta match will be the Capital Projects Fund. DONE, RATIFIED AND ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH AUGUSTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, ON THIS ______ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025. Briton S. Williams, Mayor ATTEST: Jamie Paul, City Clerk ATTACHMENT #15 Page 2 of 2 City of North Augusta Hurricane Helene Recovery Update 3 February 2025 ATTACHMENT #16 Page 1 of 7 Plan for City Roads North of I-20 •City crews will complete 2nd pass North of I-20 by Friday •Contractors will remove the 4 stumps ATTACHMENT #16 Page 2 of 7 City Road Status •Savannah Barony –2nd pass complete, 6 stumps to be removed by contractors •City heavy equipment crew working in the vicinity of Hammond Hills Pool ATTACHMENT #16 Page 3 of 7 City Road Status •River North –2nd pass complete, 1 stump to be removed by contractors •City book truck crew working in the vicinity of North Augusta Middle School / Crestland neighborhood ATTACHMENT #16 Page 4 of 7 City Road Status •Boom truck will move to City streets in and around Belvedere as next priority ATTACHMENT #16 Page 5 of 7 ATTACHMENT #16 Page 6 of 7 Questions? ATTACHMENT #16 Page 7 of 7